What divestment misses is that staying engaged is likely more effective. BHP has had external pressure on coal emissions for years, but when major shareholders shared concerns it has started to act: https://t.co/MHKKskZm77 #techpolicy19w7
@SJT01577359 Or a negotiation tactic - this happened to Uber before, it improved its safety, then TfL reissues its license. Pretty clear culture clash between 'move fast and break things' silicon valley and conservative regulators (link to TPE23) #techpolicy19w7
@TechPolicyMPhil Australia's National Broadband Network is a cautionary tale - political interference from both sides of politics made it a much more expensive and lower performing network than originally promised #techpolicy19w6 https://t.co/ZRqKXd7mpT
Melbourne's Biomedical precinct brings together top universities, biotech firms, research institutes, and hospitals in the space of 2km. However, it took over a century and a lot of government infrastructure spend to make it happen: https://t.co/Z16jBsToYZ #techpolicy19w5
@ZachStiffler2 @SJT01577359 Exactly, Zach. The rise of big tech is raises many legitimate concerns, but breaking them up could be even worse #techpolicy19w4
@andrewbware @natashanyt I'd suggest it's hard for the US government to defend privacy when it hasn't taken on the mandate for data protection - most US privacy laws are state based, and Safe Harbour/US-EU Privacy Shield effectively delegates privacy standards to the EU #techpolicy19w4
@TLloydSmith This is a more compelling reason to regulate big tech than pure anti-trust (as they natural monopolies due to network effects). But breaking them up seems like the wrong remedy - instead regulate them through things like access rights and advertising restrictions #techpolicy19w4
@DanushiPeiris However, shift from heroin to ice made drugs a public safety *problem*, increasing the *political* appetite to intervene. Vic gov chose a health (root cause) rather than justice (symptoms) response - the right policy, but they won't get much credit (2/2) #techpolicy19w3
@DanushiPeiris Great example! It took many years of advocacy, mostly from GPs, to shift the drug *policy* discussion from criminal justice to health, but the *political* appetite wasn't there. (1/2) #techpolicy19w3
There are causal factors in both directions, but you need a balance of human capital, institutions and infrastructure for sustainable growth. Countries with high GDP and low SEDA have shaky foundations and usually relying on natural resources (think Qatar).
My very first project at BCG supported an attempt to analyse this tradeoff through a 'Sustainable Economic Development Assessment': https://t.co/Ma84KyNBtV #techpolicy19w2
Our week 2 blog on the tensions (real and imagined) between GDP growth, inequality and sustainability is now available for comment #techpolicy19w2 https://t.co/UXNdLKeJGg
@TLloydSmith@TechPolicyMPhil@Qantas@Boeing@Airbus@business Even Qantas would only benefit from this range innovation on a handful of (very lucrative) routes, but the spillovers in fuel efficiency and flight comfort in mid-range would be much bigger impacts that wouldn’t be as newsworthy.
The US is blacklisting Chinese AI firms used in Uighur suppression- is this a good way to shape the values behind AI, or will industry fragmentation make it harder to control in the future? #Techpol19 https://t.co/FMaJ31GBhm