@musicandroots I agree beautiful but I don't see it as sad. Especially this second enunciation, to me it feels like a reminiscence before the final explosion
@AlexeyZiskin@Nick_Arteaga1@musicandroots I am not arguing he was not great... I question that he can enter a contest with musicians who can be heard live, or have modern recordings. Listening to these (rolls?) is more of a musical archaeology exercise to me... I always wonder if the playing speed is right etc
@AlexeyZiskin@Nick_Arteaga1@musicandroots but guys, hear me out. 1) Kissin should be on these lists. Or, maybe we should do living ones only. 2) we just cannot consider Rachmaninoff. IMO we know about his playing barely more than, say, Clara Schumann.
@KasperKepp ... you are bound to observe a relative increase of the number of female cases in the older population.
In the 'perfectly controlled cohort' we are comparing 2 groups of different ages when both our outcome (AD) and confounder (gender bias) are age-related
@KasperKepp Agreed, in fact the so-called gender bias in AD is *itself* age-related, ie - minimal or absent before 70s, max in 80s, is taken into account.
So comparing an older cohort (ie vaccine ineligible) to a younger one (vaccine eligible) ...
@cremieuxrecueil@StuartJRitchie ... So if you compare an older cohort (ie vaccine ineligible) to a younger one (vaccine eligible) you are bound to observe a relative increase of the number of female cases in the older population. Does this method take that aspect into account? 2/2
@cremieuxrecueil@StuartJRitchie One thing that is unclear to me is whether the fact that the gender bias in AD is *itself* age-related, ie - minimal or absent before 70s, max in 80s, is taken into account. 1/2
@mcstarr1 It is a frustrating and sometimes odd process, but it is possible to find an email. First step: does your institution have an automatic archiving policy? If so, after how long?