@VRCPuck Ya, it's the same here. That's all common law practices.
And very little recourse if your innocent to law enforcement due to qualified immunity. It sucks, but its how it is for a lot of people.
@VRCPuck The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 and Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 show a real issue of extreme pornography, and the dangers that were had in the past.
I presume it's how they made their decision, although I do agree the new addition is extremely broad
@VRCPuck I understand the concern, but it covers images that explicitly show strangling or suffocating, not positions. Ordinary missionary/face sitting wouldn’t normally qualify, and participants can raise a defense (s.67B). The wording is vague, but case law should clarify it over time.
@MidinVal@ZekkVRC Sadly there really isn't another option. It really is vrchat does content labels and moderate the harassment, or ban generative ai and moderate that. There is no positive option, and them wanting one is the real issue here. They can't have their cake and eat it too
@MidinVal@ZekkVRC Exactly, with or without labels there will be harassment. So making the comment vrchat made has no sense to it. If they want a productive solution they just need to ban full AI generation. There is no reason to make these labels, just ban AI generation, not AI tools.
@ZekkVRC Sadly its on the assumption that people wouldnt harass. As much as the filter is useful, people will just use it to mass target others. I can only presume the mindset, even if i dont agree with it. I just find their defense fully inadequate/ingenious
@ZekkVRC I though this survey made no sense to do on google forms, an in-game survey would have been more authentic. If vrchat really wanted opinions on this, they should have asked for the negative/positive impacts AI generated content would have on their platform.
@ZekkVRC IMO It's easy to draw the line at generative work because it constitutes IP/Trademark theft. So not only can generative content be stolen, but it's existence in vrchat is opened to liability and legal problems. Vrchat wants a middle ground that simply can't exist for them
@Sergster1 AI use is AI use. The binary tag is to let users have the choice to support someone using AI vs someone not using it. What this should be trying to address is people using AI to Generate a world/texture/props.
But, I'm more confused on how all your textures have baked shadows.
@Najiko10 Both problems exist separately. But VRChat's inaction to both speak volumes. Both AI Mass Creation, and Avatar Ripping will be the downfall encouraging more and more theft, and more mass production, and more encryption breaking.
@Najiko10 VRChat isn't about mass producing creativity, but that is how AI is currently being used. In contests like spookality, it's about creativity. AI prevents people from learning, and it's becoming bad. It's to the point people are not knowing how to upload avatars anymore.
@Najiko10 VRchat needs better encryption, people need to not steal. AI can be used as a tool, I see it in real life for my job in network threat detection. The issue is the creative works lose value the more you generate.