GIWA Alpha Hunter

Exploring projects, narratives and opportunities on GIWA.

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA가 본격적으로 움직이기 시작하고 있습니다.

메인넷 활동이 하나둘 나타나고 있고, 실제 자금이 온체인으로 이동하기 시작했습니다. 테스트넷에서 수개월 동안 준비해온 빌더들도 이제 다음 단계를 준비하고 있습니다.

아직 인프라는 초기 단계이고 매끄럽지 않은 부분도 있지만, 오히려 그래서 앞으로 며칠이 더 흥미로운 시점입니다.

GIWA의 진짜 시험은 지금부터입니다.

실제로 어떤 앱들이 출시되는지,
유동성이 어디에 자리 잡는지,
어떤 인프라가 표준으로 자리 잡는지,
그리고 Upbit이 KBW를 전후해 무엇을 공개하는지 지켜볼 필요가 있습니다.
9월 30일~10월 1일 GIWA 부스와 10월 1일 GASOK Showcase까지 예정된 만큼, 이번 주가 GIWA 생태계의 윤곽이 본격적으로 드러나는 시점이 될 수도 있습니다.

계속 지켜보겠습니다.

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #16 — @CallPutApp 📈
Traditional options markets are constrained by brokerage accounts, market hours, and fragmented access. CallPut brings calls and puts into a non-custodial onchain interface designed to operate around the clock.

Its stock and ETF products are synthetic options. They reference market prices but do not represent shares, broker-listed options, tokenized stocks, dividends, voting rights, or ownership of the underlying company.
What is already live or announced?

• CallPut lists synthetic options referencing QQQ, SPY, EWY, TSLA, NVDA, GOOG, AAPL, PLTR, and SPCX, alongside BTC and ETH.
• Its official website describes 24/7 wallet-based trading without account registration or custody by the platform.
• Buyers pay an option premium that defines their maximum loss upfront, avoiding the forced-liquidation structure associated with leveraged perpetual futures.
• Expiring positions use a 30-minute TWAP of the referenced underlying to determine settlement.
• CallPut announced its selection for Phase 3 of GIWA’s GASOK accelerator.

Why does this matter specifically for GIWA?
GIWA is an EVM-compatible Ethereum Layer 2 built on the OP Stack, with one-second blocks and a stated goal of connecting Upbit’s users, data, and liquidity with Web3.

CallPut could introduce a derivatives layer extending beyond crypto-native assets. EWY exposure is particularly relevant to Korean users because the ETF tracks South Korean equities, although a synthetic CallPut position provides no ownership rights in EWY or its constituent companies.

GASOK selection verifies CallPut’s participation in GIWA’s builder program. It does not by itself establish that the production exchange or its liquidity has migrated to GIWA.

Public analytics currently attribute CallPut’s measurable protocol activity to Base. During this review, I could not verify an official CallPut contract address or working trading transaction on GIWA Sepolia.

Before using a future GIWA deployment, verify:
• The network and contract addresses published by @CallPutApp
• The reference-price source, settlement TWAP, expiry, premium, spread, and fees
• Available liquidity and the rules applied when underlying markets are closed
• Whether the position is settled on GIWA rather than merely promoted through GASOK
No CallPut-specific Sepolia transaction can therefore be recommended yet.

A practical preparation step is to add GIWA Sepolia using chain ID 91342, claim test ETH through the official GIWA or Nodit faucet, and monitor CallPut’s official channels for a verified deployment address.
Markets may close.

Onchain options are testing whether exposure has to close with them.
#GIWA @CallPutApp #CallPut

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA가 본격적으로 움직이기 시작하고 있습니다.

메인넷 활동이 하나둘 나타나고 있고, 실제 자금이 온체인으로 이동하기 시작했습니다. 테스트넷에서 수개월 동안 준비해온 빌더들도 이제 다음 단계를 준비하고 있습니다.

아직 인프라는 초기 단계이고 매끄럽지 않은 부분도 있지만, 오히려 그래서 앞으로 며칠이 더 흥미로운 시점입니다.

GIWA의 진짜 시험은 지금부터입니다.

실제로 어떤 앱들이 출시되는지,
유동성이 어디에 자리 잡는지,
어떤 인프라가 표준으로 자리 잡는지,
그리고 Upbit이 KBW를 전후해 무엇을 공개하는지 지켜볼 필요가 있습니다.
9월 30일~10월 1일 GIWA 부스와 10월 1일 GASOK Showcase까지 예정된 만큼, 이번 주가 GIWA 생태계의 윤곽이 본격적으로 드러나는 시점이 될 수도 있습니다.

계속 지켜보겠습니다.

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #15 — @gosodax 🌐

A new chain can have fast blocks and useful applications, yet still struggle if its liquidity remains isolated.

SODAX is building cross-network execution infrastructure for that problem. Applications integrate its SDK or APIs so users can swap, lend, borrow, move assets, or enter yield products without every application maintaining separate liquidity on every network.

Its execution model is intent-based.

The user specifies the outcome they want rather than constructing each bridge and swap step. SODAX coordinates the request, independent solvers fill it using available liquidity, and the system reports a completed or failed terminal state instead of presenting a silent partial fill.

What is live or publicly announced?

• The SODAX website reports 11,990 trading routes across 21 networks.
• It lists 76 crypto assets, 13 stablecoins, and 21 real-world assets.
• Its documentation covers cross-network swaps, lending, borrowing, asset transfers, and leveraged-yield vaults.
• Eight audit reports are published across multiple supported contract environments.
• The stated base transaction fee is 0.1%.
Why does this matter specifically for GIWA?
GIWA is an OP Stack-based, EVM-compatible Layer 2 with one-second blocks. However, execution speed inside GIWA does not solve the initial problem of bringing assets and liquidity from other networks.
SODAX has publicly positioned its infrastructure for builders emerging from GIWA’s GASOK program. Its most concrete GIWA ecosystem integration is CheomaYield, announced on September 10.
Through the SODAX SDK, Cheoma accepts stablecoins originating from more than 20 networks and settles them into its Sonic pre-deposit vault. SODAX identifies Cheoma as its first GIWA ecosystem partner and says the teams plan to extend the cross-network deposit model onto GIWA when the required mainnet infrastructure is ready.

That boundary is important: the existing Cheoma flow settles on Sonic, not GIWA mainnet.

Before using a SODAX-powered product, verify:

• The source network, destination network, asset, quoted output, and total fees
• Which solver and contracts execute and settle the intent
• Whether the specific GIWA route is live, tested, and visible through the relevant explorers

No clearly documented public SODAX swap interface completing a user transaction directly on GIWA Sepolia was confirmed during this review.

A practical action today is to study SODAX’s first-swap documentation and request a quote, which requires neither funds nor a signature. Do not submit execution until the displayed route and destination chain match the intended transaction.

GIWA can make blocks move quickly.

SODAX is working on the harder question: how capital reaches those blocks without becoming trapped between networks.
#GIWA @gosodax #SODAX

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #14— @quadrixfinance 🧭

On-chain finance can make transactions visible. It does not automatically make an investment strategy understandable, enforceable, or easy to exit.

Quadrix is building an on-chain asset-management platform around self-custodied vaults. Its public description says institutional strategies are delivered through smart contracts, with fees and withdrawals enforced by the code holding the assets when Quadrix-built contracts are used.

That distinction matters. Users should be able to verify not only where capital sits, but also which rules control deposits, fees, valuation, and withdrawals.

What is publicly visible?

• Quadrix presents QX20 as an active strategy and displays a net asset value of 1.2464.
• Its website identifies GIWA Sepolia as a supported environment.
• The platform states that all of its GIWA Sepolia contracts are source-code verified.
• Quadrix separates its own vault contracts from strategies operated through partner infrastructure, where the applicable documentation may differ.
Why does this matter specifically for GIWA?
GIWA is an EVM-compatible Ethereum Layer 2 built with the OP Stack. Its one-second blocks can support faster portfolio interactions and more responsive reporting than slower settlement environments.
More importantly, GIWA aims to connect Upbit’s users, data, and liquidity with Web3. Asset-management vaults could provide those users with a structured alternative to manually moving funds among individual DeFi protocols.

Self-custody changes the trust model, but it does not eliminate risk. A vault can still depend on strategy execution, external protocols, administrators, price inputs, and accurate net-asset-value calculations.

Before using a Quadrix vault, verify:

• The contract address and source code on the GIWA Sepolia explorer
• Which assets and protocols the strategy can access
• How NAV, performance, fees, withdrawal timing, and emergency controls are calculated or enforced

As of September 14, Quadrix’s public website provides the core product positioning and reports verified GIWA Sepolia contracts. However, publicly indexed material does not provide enough detail to independently reproduce the QX20 portfolio, its valuation methodology, historical performance, or full risk controls.

No official GASOK participation announcement was located during verification.

A practical Sepolia action is to open Quadrix through its official domain, connect a dedicated test wallet, confirm that the selected network is GIWA Sepolia, and copy every displayed contract address into the official explorer. Check source-code verification and recent activity before signing any transaction.
An asset manager asks for trust.
An on-chain asset manager should give users the tools to verify where that trust begins and ends.

#GIWA @quadrixfinance #Quadrix

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #13 — @CheomaYield_xyz 🏠

A stablecoin sitting idle preserves its denomination, but it does not automatically generate productive value.

CheomaYield is building a fixed-APY stablecoin protocol around that problem. Its documentation describes tokenized vaults backed primarily by GCC sovereign and corporate sukuk, supplemented by a smaller market-neutral event-contract strategy.

The name comes from “cheoma,” the eaves of a traditional Korean house: a shelter for capital under the roof of GIWA.

What is already live?

• The Cheoma app provides a GIWA Sepolia interface for wallets, vaults, referrals, points, and a testnet leaderboard.
• Users can claim 10,000 mock USDC once every 24 hours and use it to test the vault flow.
• Referral codes are minted as transferable ERC-721 NFTs on GIWA Sepolia.
• Separate promotional pre-deposit vaults are listed on Base, BOT Chain, Sonic, and Robinhood Chain.
CheomaYield also integrated the SODAX SDK. SODAX announced on September 10 that deposits can be routed from more than 20 networks into Cheoma’s Sonic pre-deposit vault without requiring a separate manual bridge.
Why does this matter specifically for GIWA?
GIWA is an EVM-compatible OP Stack Layer 2 with one-second blocks. A native yield layer could give stablecoins a use beyond transfers and DEX liquidity while producing recurring transactions for deposits, withdrawals, receipts, and referrals.

The Korean framing also fits GIWA’s identity. Cheoma connects the traditional hanok concept with an on-chain financial product, while its longer-term positioning anticipates won-denominated stablecoin products.

That KRW product remains a stated direction rather than a verified live vault.

Cheoma’s documents say its full mainnet product targets approximately 13% APR. The much higher rates displayed for current pre-deposit vaults are described as promotional, time-limited, and restricted by relatively small caps; they should not be confused with the sustainable-rate target.

Before depositing, verify:

• The network, deposit asset, lock period, cap, and receipt-token transfer rules
• The exact vault contract against the relevant block explorer
• The current fee, withdrawal, referral, and yield-payment terms

One practical GIWA Sepolia action is available now: connect a test wallet, switch to GIWA Sepolia, claim mock USDC from Cheoma’s faucet, test a vault deposit, and inspect the transaction in the official explorer. A small amount of test ETH is required for gas.

A roof does more than cover a house.

If Cheoma works as designed, it could give GIWA’s stablecoin capital somewhere productive to live.
#GIWA @CheomaYield_xyz #CheomaYield

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #12 — @Arco_Fi 🏛️

Moving financial products on-chain requires more than token issuance. Capital must be organized, ownership recorded, and transactions routed through a structure users can understand and verify.

ARCO describes its purpose in those terms: structuring funds, registering ownership, and routing crypto-native capital into tokenized financial products.

That positions ARCO around the infrastructure connecting capital with tokenized products rather than around a single asset or trading venue.

Why could this matter for GIWA?

• Tokenized financial products need transparent ownership records and controlled capital flows.
• GIWA’s EVM compatibility could allow Ethereum-based fund contracts and development tools to be adapted for its ecosystem.
• Its one-second block time could support responsive subscription, transfer, and redemption interfaces if ARCO deploys there.
• GIWA’s connection with Upbit could make clear product structure especially important for Korean users moving from centralized platforms toward self-custody.
GIWA is an OP Stack-based Ethereum Layer 2. Its official documentation highlights one-second blocks, EVM compatibility, Korean-language developer resources, and a goal of connecting more users, data, and liquidity to Web3.
Those mechanics provide a plausible technical environment for tokenized finance, but a project-specific deployment must still be verified separately.
As of September 13, ARCO’s official website is accessible and its official X profile identifies the project’s intended function. Publicly accessible materials do not yet provide detailed documentation covering fund formation, eligible assets, custody, valuation, redemption, fees, jurisdictions, audits, or investor eligibility.

I also could not verify an ARCO contract address or a working ARCO transaction flow on GIWA Sepolia, nor official confirmation of ARCO’s participation in GASOK.

Before treating ARCO as live GIWA financial infrastructure, verify:

• Contract addresses published directly through ARCO’s official channels
• Matching source-code verification and transaction history on the GIWA Sepolia explorer
• Documentation defining ownership rights, asset custody, valuation, fees, and redemption
• Clear separation between testnet demonstrations and products involving real capital

There is therefore no verified ARCO-specific Sepolia transaction to recommend today.

A practical preparation step is to connect an EVM wallet to GIWA Sepolia, obtain test ETH from the official Nodit faucet, and monitor @Arco_Fi for an announced deployment. Any published address should be matched against the official explorer before signing.

Tokenization can put ownership on-chain.
ARCO’s real test will be making the structure behind that ownership equally visible.
#GIWA @Arco_Fi #ARCO

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #12 — @Flutchdotfun 🚀

New chains need more than bridges and exchanges. They also need a reliable path for builders to create markets and bring new assets on-chain.

FlutchFun describes itself as launch infrastructure for the next generation of builders. Its public messaging positions the project around token creation and discovery rather than the launch of a separate Flutch token.

The project has also been actively discussing GIWA through its official X account and directing users to an early-access whitelist.

What has been publicly announced?

• FlutchFun reported that more than 500 early members had joined its whitelist.
• The project announced an integration with GMGN, intended to make FlutchFun-launched assets easier to discover and track.
• FlutchFun stated that 70% of fee rewards would be returned to token creators.
• Its official X profile identifies the product as launch infrastructure and says it is not launching its own token.
Why does this matter specifically for GIWA?
GIWA is an EVM-compatible Layer 2 built with the OP Stack. Its Sepolia testnet uses chain ID 91342 and ETH for gas, while the mainnet remains under development according to GIWA’s public node repository.
A functioning launch platform could help GIWA-native communities create assets without individually building token contracts, launch interfaces, and market-discovery infrastructure.

The creator-reward model could also give builders an ongoing economic link to the trading activity generated by their launches. The exact calculation method, eligible volume, payment asset, and withdrawal conditions have not yet been documented in publicly accessible technical materials.

Before using FlutchFun on GIWA, verify:

• The official GIWA contract addresses published by @Flutchdotfun
• Whether those contracts are source-code verified on the GIWA Sepolia explorer
• The token-launch and liquidity-creation mechanism
• How the stated 70% creator fee reward is calculated and distributed
• Whether GMGN displays the correct chain and contract for each launched asset

As of September 12, I could not verify a public FlutchFun contract or a functioning FlutchFun transaction flow on GIWA Sepolia. No FlutchFun-specific testnet action can therefore be recommended yet.

The practical preparation is straightforward: connect an EVM wallet to GIWA Sepolia using chain ID 91342, receive test ETH through the official Nodit faucet, and wait for FlutchFun to publish its verified deployment address before approving any contract.

A launchpad does not prove itself when a token is created.
It proves itself when creators, liquidity, and users can survive what happens next.
#GIWA @Flutchdotfun #FlutchFun

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

@Luceyeon @Baro_Quest Exactly. That’s why real-time conversations can be an early signal before on-chain activity starts to move.

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #10 — @Baro_Quest 📡

A blockchain can measure transactions on-chain. Measuring what Korean users are actually discussing is a different problem.

BARO is building a crypto-intelligence dashboard focused on Korean Telegram communities. Its live product tracks project mindshare, trending messages, narratives, channel influence, and the gap between Korean and global attention.

As of September 11, BARO’s channel dashboard states that it monitors 160 Korean crypto channels representing approximately 1.7 million combined subscribers. It displays project mentions, message views, forwards, and an influence score for each tracked channel.

Why does this matter specifically for GIWA?

• GIWA projects need evidence of Korean user interest beyond wallet and transaction counts.
• Overseas teams entering the Upbit-centered ecosystem may struggle to identify the narratives and communities shaping Korea’s market.
• BARO can show whether attention is concentrated in Korea or remains stronger globally.
• Builders can compare community momentum before and after campaigns, product releases, or GASOK announcements.
BARO’s official X profile has publicly described its role as helping global teams identify relevant Korean KOLs, activate communities, and measure mindshare. It has also announced its participation in the Upbit GIWA GASOK accelerator.
The product is already accessible through baro quest.
Its intelligence dashboard includes seven-day project rankings, real-time trending messages, hot narratives, a Korean social-sentiment Fear & Greed index, and channel leaderboards. Its Kimchi Mindshare Gap compares Korean Telegram attention with global LunarCrush snapshots for supported projects.

BARO Quest provides a separate campaign layer for Web3 missions and rewards. The public campaign page currently reports 505 cumulative participants and three completed mission records, although no active quest was shown at the time of verification.

Before using BARO data, check:

• The measurement period attached to every ranking or percentage
• Whether the project and relevant Korean channels are included in BARO’s tracking set
• Whether a movement reflects broader discussion or a small number of highly forwarded messages

BARO does not currently present a verified user-facing smart-contract action on GIWA Sepolia. Its role is primarily intelligence and market activation, so there is no BARO-specific testnet transaction to recommend today.

A practical step is to open the BARO dashboard, record GIWA’s current Korean mindshare and related trending messages, and compare the result after the next major GIWA or GASOK announcement.

GIWA records what users do on-chain.
BARO is trying to explain what Korea is saying before those transactions happen.
#GIWA @Baro_Quest #BARO

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

@Baro_Quest @Ember_web3 Exactly. On-chain data shows what users did, but conversations can reveal what they may do next. That’s why tracking both matters.

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

@pabalx @Baro_Quest It will be posted soon. Cheering you on!

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #11 — @zeoul_dex 🔄

A DEX can become core infrastructure for a new chain—but only when its contracts, liquidity, and interface can be independently verified.

ZEOUL’s public identity is @zeoul_dex. As of September 12, however, I could not verify an accessible official website, technical documentation, published contract addresses, or a functioning interface through publicly indexed sources.

That limits what can responsibly be stated about the project today.

No confirmed information was found describing ZEOUL’s automated-market-maker design, liquidity model, fee structure, supported assets, security review, team, or deployment schedule.

Why is this verification important for GIWA?

• A native exchange would determine where newly issued GIWA assets first obtain liquidity.
• GIWA’s OP Stack architecture and stated one-second block time could support quick swaps, but performance claims require a working deployment.
• Upbit familiarity may attract Korean users who have limited experience with self-custody and decentralized exchanges.
• Incorrect contract addresses can expose those users to counterfeit tokens, malicious approvals, and unusable liquidity pools.
GIWA currently provides an official Sepolia explorer, faucet, bridge information, and developer documentation. These resources make it possible to validate a project once it publishes its deployment details.
Before treating ZEOUL as a live GIWA DEX, verify:
• A contract address announced directly by @zeoul_dex
• The same address and source-code verification on the GIWA Sepolia explorer
• Swap and liquidity-pool transactions recorded on-chain
• Clear documentation covering fees, slippage, token approvals, and liquidity withdrawal
• Confirmation of any claimed GASOK participation from ZEOUL or GIWA

There is no verified ZEOUL-specific Sepolia transaction to recommend at this time.

The practical action is to prepare the official verification path: obtain test ETH only through GIWA’s official faucet, open the official Sepolia explorer, and wait for @zeoul_dex to publish a contract address. When one appears, compare the address character by character before connecting a wallet.

A project name and interface are not enough to establish a functioning exchange.
For ZEOUL, the next meaningful milestone is simple: publish the product, publish the contracts, and let GIWA Sepolia verify the activity.
Liquidity begins with capital.
Trust begins with an address anyone can check.
#GIWA @zeoul_dex #ZEOUL

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

Mapping GIWA beyond DeFi.

An ecosystem watchlist across 12 categories, from infrastructure and wallets to NFTs and community projects.

Evidence labels distinguish checked sources from items needing further verification. Not an official roster.

What’s missing?

#GIWA

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

@pabalx @GIWA_by_Upbit 아따마

[GIWA ECO @giwadoteco]

GIWA Ecosystem News (9/14)

- 1,111개 NFT 컬렉션 TILE(@TileOnGIWA)이 NFT 프로젝트를 취소한다고 알렸고, $TILE은 GIWA에서 진행한다고 덧붙였습니다

- GIWA 기반 프로그래머블 유동성 마켓 Ammora(@AmmoraHQ)가 테스트넷 지표로 대기자 등록 56,017건, SDK 다운로드 4,824건, 유동성 공급자 32,192명, 공급��� 테스트넷 ETH 105.95를 공개했습니다

- Web3 크리에이터 이코노미 플랫폼 CreatorX(@CXInc_SocialFi)가 YC S26 합류를 알렸고, 로빈후드 체인 위의 첫 Web3 틱톡으로 크리에이터 토큰 발행·거래를 지원한다고 설명했습니다

- 크립토 커뮤니티 리워드 플랫폼 HodlerStation(@hodlerstation)이 KBW 2026 플래너를 출시해 일정을 직접 구성하고 공유용 이미지로 저장할 수 있게 했습니다

- 암호화폐 결제 게이트웨이 XPAYR(@XPayrPay)는 AI 에이전트 간 API 결제에서 블록 확인 지연과 여러 가스 토큰 보유가 문제라며, 가스를 USDC로 정산하는 Circle의 L1 Arc 위에 구축한다고 밝혔습니다

- Pabal(@pabalx)이 참가자 10명을 추가로 ���집하며, 말 이름과 참가 이유를 댓글로 남기라고 안내했습니다

[Paguinfo @NewPaguinfo]

GIWA Gasok 페이지가 크게 바뀌었다

참고로 GIWA 는 Upbit 가 준비하고 있는 체인 @GIWA_by_Upbit
Gasok 은 GIWA 의 지원 프로그램 @Official_Upbit

신청은 APPLY NOW → Closed.
Phase 3 기간이 8–9월 2개월에서 8–11월 4개월로 늘었다.

일정도 갈라졌다.
KBW Showcase(10월, 트랙별 1팀·총 5팀) + Finalist Demoday TBA.

Phase 4 Growth는 2027년 1월~.
Package partners는 COMING SOON에서 QuickNode, CertiK, Nodit + MORE.
VC Judges만 아직 COMING SOON.

선정 팀 이름은 여전히 없다.

공식 X는 9/7 이후 새 글 없음, ��로워 ~9,588.

Grok Bot 이 알려준 내용인데,
여러모로 지연이 되는 모양

행보를 너무 조심하는 모양새라 그런지, 하이프도 잘 붙지 않는듯

뭐 아직 너무 오래 남아서, 결국 런칭까지 봐야 할듯

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

@NewPaguinfo @GIWA_by_Upbit @Official_Upbit 빨리 세상에서보자 ~

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #9 — @SuperWalk_ 👟

SuperWalk turns physical movement into a digital reward experience.

Its Basic Mode works as a reward-based pedometer without requiring an NFT. Pro Mode adds blockchain mechanics: users exercise with NFT shoes, earn rewards, improve equipment, and compete through leaderboards and crews.

That combination gives SuperWalk something many Web3 applications struggle to obtain—an existing consumer activity loop built around an ordinary habit.

Why could this matter for GIWA?

• Fitness offers a consumer-facing use case beyond trading, lending, and speculation.
• GIWA’s stated one-second block time and low transaction fees could support frequent reward claims and item-related transactions.
• SuperWalk’s Korean operating base fits GIWA’s goal of taking locally developed Web3 services to a wider market.
• A simplified wallet and stablecoin payment environment could eventually reduce friction between exercise rewards, digital assets, and real-world benefits.
The SuperWalk documentation identifies WALK and GRND as its in-app tokens. It says they are used for functions including shoe repair, synthesis, leveling, building, and item purchases.
However, this distinction is important: SuperWalk’s public website and documentation confirm its existing Move-to-Earn service, but they do not currently document a live SuperWalk deployment on GIWA Sepolia.
Before treating SuperWalk as an active GIWA application, verify:

• Whether @SuperWalk_ announces GIWA as an officially supported network
• Whether GIWA Sepolia explorer records contain verified SuperWalk contracts
• Whether any migration, bridge, reward, NFT, or wallet-integration plan is published
• Whether participation in GIWA or GASOK is confirmed by either organization

There is therefore no verified SuperWalk-specific Sepolia transaction to recommend today.

The practical action is verification itself: monitor the official SuperWalk account and compare any announced contract address against the GIWA Sepolia explorer before connecting a wallet or approving a transaction.

GIWA describes itself as an OP Stack-based Layer 2 powered by Upbit, with a planned self-custody wallet and a stablecoin ecosystem using Korean-won and global stablecoins. Those components could be relevant to a Korean consumer application with recurring rewards—but an actual SuperWalk integration must still be demonstrated publicly.
SuperWalk already connects walking with Web3 rewards.

The question for GIWA is whether those footsteps will eventually land on its own blocks.
#GIWA @SuperWalk_ #SuperWalk

[GIWA Alpha Hunter @giwadotalpha]

GIWA Ecosystem Watch #9 — @Hanok_io 🏷️

GIWA can attract wallets with bridges, trading, and rewards. The harder question is whether each application can recognize what those wallets have already contributed.

HANOK is building a shared contribution layer for that problem.

The service converts supported wallet assets and activity into a Hanok Score. Instead of every GIWA application rebuilding its own user-ranking system, a DEX, lending market, launchpad, or campaign could read the same contribution signal and apply its own eligibility or benefit rules.

The user proves wallet ownership by signing a message. HANOK states that this signature does not grant permission to move assets.

Season 0 separates the score into two areas: activity on GIWA and external on-chain history. Its current framework examines GIWA capital and registered-contract activity alongside assets, NFTs, meme-token history, and DeFi activity across supported external chains.

Why does this matter for GIWA?

• New applications need a way to distinguish active ecosystem participants from newly created wallets.
• A shared score could support fee tiers, yield boosts, launch access, and targeted campaigns without forcing each application to build its own analytics stack.
• External history gives experienced users a starting signal before GIWA mainnet develops a long transaction history of its own.
• HANOK says GIWA activity is intended to carry more weight across future scoring seasons, creating a direct reason to remain active inside the ecosystem.
HANOK is available on GIWA Sepolia and has announced its selection for GASOK Phase 3. The current score framework counts native ETH and canonical USDC or USDT held on GIWA, while registered GIWA contract activity forms a separate component.
There is an important boundary.
The partner-facing Hanok Score API is currently published as a v0.2 draft, but its implementation is still pending. Upbit holdings and trading activity are also listed as planned rather than currently included.

Before relying on the score, check:

• Which assets, protocols, and contracts are included or excluded
• The policy version and calculation time attached to the score
• Whether an advertised benefit is actually active through an integrated GIWA application

One practical move today: visit hanok io, open My Score, connect a test wallet, and inspect which activities contribute points. Then compare the breakdown with the wallet’s actual GIWA Sepolia history.

A score matters only when applications agree to read it.

HANOK is trying to make contribution portable across GIWA.
#GIWA @Hanok_io #HANOK