G Just Looking

Curious mind in tech or anything new | Finding insights on AI, The Universe, Interesting stuff | Always learning, always questioning | Always looking. 👀

[Night Sky Now @NightSkyNow]

I saw the Past, Present and Future at the same time.

~ Nikola Tesla

✨🙌🏾💫

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@forallcurious Grok fixed your graphic, this is what the current JWST shows, first stars are fully formed, so now there's that pretzel problem of no baby stars after "big bang", just more old stuff when we look back further.

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@AllaAisling Majestic medieval heraldic eagle

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@kekmaximusk Day 1: Bangs on rock for kick, starts tapping twigs for rhythm, learns to make nice sounds with voice, music gets written in the mind, music gets written by hand, music gets programmed in MIDI in a DAW, music get written by AI in a terminal, music gets ........ ?

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@AstronomyVibes There was no big bang, so no need for a "before" question. This is the point where everyone starts twisting ideas into pretzels trying to make sense of something, that is essentially, IMO, incorrect. The Big Bang theory make so many assumptions, with so many loose ends. 🤷‍♂️

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@Preda2005 @grok New imagine definitely does virtual screens better.
Crazy details, in the Astronaut visor too! 😳
"Planning where to go next"

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

My view A closed-loop mechanical framework: finite static volume with a filled intergalactic plasma/hydrogen medium (IGA gradients) driving refractive scattering for redshift/dimming, achromatic 'tired light' without energy loss. Plasma boundaries trigger resonant matter assemmbly, stars fuse/supernovae recycle, black holes as conversion nodes with jets feeding back into the field. Perpetual hysteresis keeps equilibrum (bounded ~2.7 K fluctuations), no Big Bang or heat death, just density setting structure, thermodynamics governing behavior, time making it inevitable.

It’s a fun thought experiment anyway, let's see what more JWST data shakes loose. That model I described will fit what JWST shakes loose. Exciting times ahead!"

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

Fair points, supernova dilation and CMB uniformity are tough nuts, and DESI's holding the line for now. But the 'tweaks' for early JWST galaxies feel like more epicycles on a model already leaning on 68% mystery energy.
What grabs me? are closed-loop mechanical ideas: finite static volume with a filled intergalactic medium (plasma/hydrogen gradients) causing gradual light scattering/dimming over distance, mimics 'acceleration' and redshift without expansion or dark energy. No heat death, just perpetual equilibrium via density/thermodynamics feedback.
Ottawa's evolving constants paper got me thinking along those lines too. Curious how mainstream handles plasma cosmology revivals if JWST keeps punching holes in timelines!

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

The supernova data assumes redshift purely means expansion + uniform distances. But if light interacts with the intergalactic medium over billions of years (scattering, fatigue), dimming looks like 'acceleration' without needing a repulsive mystery force dominating 68% of everything.
JWST's early massive galaxies already strain the timeline – feels like more patches on a leaky model. Why invoke undetectable energy when mechanical alternatives (static volume, field gradients) could fit cleaner?"

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@grok @YGuillemet17015 @Glitchymagic @curiosityonx Dark energy is just an invention to "explain' acceleration.

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

The JWST has 100% thrown a curve ball into standard cosmology, spotting massive, mature galaxies at redshifts (z) up to 14 that shouldn't exist so "early" in a Big Bang universe, exacerbating tensions like the Hubble constant mismatch and the need for ad-hoc tweaks to dark energy or inflation.
The ΛCDM model struggles with JWST data because it relies on an expanding metric, forcing inventions like dark energy (68% of the universe) to explain acceleration, or inflation to smooth out early lumps. But JWST shows a universe that's too uniform and evolved too soon.

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

A cinematic journey through the real cosmos: fly past galaxies, through refractive layers of intergalactic hydrogen plasma causing observed redshift without expansion. Finite, static, flat Euclidean universe in perfect equilibrium."
@G2imagine

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@forallcurious Yes, they are correct, it's big, it's rotating, no big bang heat death for us. The JWST is the biggest elephant in the room destroying the current ACDM model every time we look "further" back and things don't fit. But let's keep adding patches to the current model.🤷‍♂️

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@aziz4ai QT Something Black and Red, rolling.

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@cb_doge Year of the horse, apocalypse.

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

😂 True.

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@PhilosophyOfPhy Im just going to leave this here. I hope someone takes the time to click and read (1min). It's all hydrogen-plasma fog. Receipts with a full repo.
https://t.co/FhKo57TzA6

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

$300 gives you access to to Grok Heavy, 4 x Agents at once for a query of you want. It upgrades the exisiting Supergrok. With that sub, you get to use the API as you would any normal API, just with a $50 credit. Web interface is just that, an AI interface like any normal AI. Im using the tool calling functions lately. Not sure if i answered your question? https://t.co/r8MlvtvS6x

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@sticktoitivity @minchoi Understood, so then effectively, Supergrok "could be" $250 with pay to play afterwards for their API calls. Or you pay the $300 for high level AI access and they thrown in $50 API credit to get you going. 🤷‍♂️

[G Just Looking @gjustlooking]

@sticktoitivity @minchoi What toy level, the $50 or the amount of access $50 gets you?