CEO of Racism™

Uhm acshually the heckin wholesome muzzies have a Human Right™ to your tax dollars, it's called basic friggin decency and empathy. You should try some, chud!

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@TheLaurenChen In a libertarian framework, said neighborhood would physically remove those drug addicts most likely. But the government can't allow such heckin discrimination now can it? "Most libertarians" are center-left midwits who think libertarianism is when no rulz and infinite migrants

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@JundSirilak @LibertyNetus It is well established locally that gang members have certain tattoos which normal people would not have, the police has a catalogue of each and they always check. While imprisonment is not ideal, removal of such individual from society is not unthinkable in principle.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@MatthewtrueI @rierikawaii Most questions are clear cut in the framework of "ancapistan". The philosophical debates are about what we do in the contemporary statist world. The state claiming monopoly on violence and refusing to use it can be a form of aggression too. Say, if the state dgaf about murderers.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@burnthalies @YeeticusFlex @fxxkpaleos Yes there is if the aquisition of said property comes with a covenant. An apartment complex association can reserve the right to evict a resident and liquidate their flat if they blast niggarap 24/7 and throw feces out the window.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@MatthewtrueI @rierikawaii And there is nothing contradictory of someone who was, is and will always be incapable of reason not being covered by NAP. This doesn't imply that it's okay to kill them or anything like that.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@MatthewtrueI @rierikawaii You are free to be a cunt or degenerate but it doesn't mean that society is obligated to tolerate you and can't expel you. And NAP requires to have the potential of being a rational actor.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@AustrPamplets >I take 50$ from your wallet
> I gift you a cake in return

Not theft?

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@PeterSweden7 Too little, too late.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@burnthalies @YeeticusFlex @fxxkpaleos Yes you fucking can if the covenant that you signed says so. Big god damn sigh.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@MatthewtrueI @rierikawaii Just because something doesn't violate the NAP doesn't make it moral. NAP doesn't extend to animals yet libertarianism doesn't allow animal torture.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@ramikurimo Kokoomus on selkärangaton ja periaatteeton pseudo-oikeistolainen puolue. Eivät he sano mitään mikä saattaisi herättää polemiikkia.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@Milo_H4 Libertarianism is when no consoquences for criminals ahh argument

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@NeedsMoreInput @CptAncapistan I'm paying for my car insurance, dentist, and retirement savings just fine. Tho the local government insists taking a portion of my humble salary for their heckin better retirement program.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@NeedsMoreInput @CptAncapistan Yes because the government is stealing my money instead of me paying for those services directly

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@NeoliberalAkiho It's an ethical argument. If something is theft, then maybe governments should have a moral duty to at least minimize it. Instead, we're often seeing the reverse.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@NeedsMoreInput @CptAncapistan And? Doesn't make taxation not theft from an ethical pov

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@NeedsMoreInput @CptAncapistan Libertarians are not constitutionalists.

[CEO of Racism™ @gladiatio]

@Cuddly49905741 @CptAncapistan >*moves"
>acshually youre a heckin citizen of muttmerica so you VILL pay taxes to us no matter where you are