Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨

@glamorous024

Persistent Yoga practitioner finding inner peace. #GirlsWhoCode Follow me for positivity and love🎀

Houston, TX

Joined November 2022

120 Following

121 Followers

158 Posts

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

5 months ago

@flaviogarag Entendo, muitos filmes assim são bem arrastados mesmo. Difícil manter o interesse.

glamorous024 retweeted

Astronomer

@astronomer_zero

5 months ago

$BTC Account doubled in 1.5 months (5% risk per trade on average) ✅ Here's how I did it (secrets to trading philosophy revealed) Alright, just doubled my account from trading the range so far since start of Feb. And, to many of you, that should be to no surprise, because these trades are all built on the backbone of our macro range masterplan since the very day it started, of calling the bottom in live time (Feb 6), range high, and range low. That range is still holding more than 1 month later. And in alignment, we have simply continued to trade it so far without failure. Many of you have been able to replicate a large part of that success since I share (almost) all of my entries and exits live, telling you exactly when to get in, and when to get out. But regardless, even if you copied all my moves, doesn't necessarily mean you doubled your account. That's exactly why I often get asked how much I exactly make, because there is one parameter I don't often talk about, which is how much I risk per trade in exact sense. And while I don't like to reveal PnL numbers too often to not draw unwanted attention, I can share relative numbers since risk is related to just that, regardless of your size. After all, risk is personal, and should be treated that way. Besides, it's treated as too holy. There is way too much emphasis on having an exact defined risk, and misinterpreted as needing a stoploss in an exact location (market makers love to hunt you), so that you can plan your exact risk and know exactly how fast your account will grow and exactly when you can retire. In reality, trading is quite different, but it's a good kind of different. Because planning retirmenent like that, to any critical mind, is nothing but a pipe dream. So this all leads to revealing a part of my trading philosophy, to help you avoid such traps and continue your journey in the right direction and especially not the wrong direction. Keep in mind, my philosophy is personal, and is often considered an unpopular opinion. It certainly is not for everyone. But if you have been liking my trades, enjoy how they feel and the stress free aspect of it as well as the real (as real as it gets) results they bring, then you're welcome in advance for the sneak peek in my trading philosophy I'm sharing here. #1 Win rate is more important than RR Unpopular opinion number 1 indeed. Because only high RR's look flashy and clean on social media. Only 10 RR+'s seem as if the trader exactly knows what he's doing. And it's very effective for selectively sharing posts too. In reality though, going for 10RR+ trades means no partials at all before hitting 5RR say, which means your trade could run to 6RR, hit all your targets except your most ambitious ones, and still result in a loss. So, even while your edge is working well, you still probably eat many losses before seeing the winning effect of your edge. That gap is frustrating because it means you have to sometimes wait days/weeks (multiple losing trades) before seeing results, which is also detrimental if you want to test a new edge (which may not be an edge in the first place). Instead, partials earlier, reduces your RR, and increases win rate because you already eliminate. If your 6RR or 7RR still hits, then you still take home 3RR or so net, instead of -1RR. This allows for steadier growth, allows you to see pretty quickly if you are doing a good job, the very next 1 or two trades, allows you to steer and adjust quickly, and by principle of risk optimisation, also allows you to risk more, and so your account ends up growing faster. It also allows you to redeploy partials if price retraces locally, and it still keeps you winning even if your final target isn't hit. You have all seen how I pinpoint entries quite exact, but then sometimes we don't get final target, or get front run, but still walk home with the win. Finally, it also allows you to keep runners which increase drastically on big trending moves. Since, if you go for a 10RR+ trade, I assure you once you hit 10RR without having taken much partial, you are very tempted to close all (I mean congrats, you just hit a homerun). But if price runs further, you feel unexposed and so you feel the strongest emotion in trading: FOMO whereas if you keep runners, you still end up with a 50RR plus runner sometimes, getting an average return of 10RR anyways, whilst keeping your high win rate, the irony. Instead leaving runners always keeps you exposed, especially when executed well in alignment with your high timeframe idea. There are some more reasons, but let's keep this post not too lengthy and move on to the second unpopular opinion: #2 Fixed position sizing - variable risk, is better than fixed risk - variable position sizing. Another very unpopular opinion. "No defined risk, no trade", "no SL, no trade", "no invalidation, no trade". The single biggest misunderstanding by far, is that a stop loss is the same as an invalidation. It's not. So instead of telling your broker (crypto exchange) exactly where you force yourself to sell, either directly (with a stoploss order), or, indirectly. Indirectly as in: with a higher position size i.e. telling your broker your stoploss/liquidation is closer, or vice versa, lower position size, telling your broker your stoploss is further away, and yes, the AI is very good at finding your forced selling point nowadays. Instead, using a fixed position size (say always 2x of your account), leaves the broker completely in the unknown. On top, it also allows you to locally monitor on set intervals whether to get in or to get out. Sometimes, you get out beyond analytical invalidation, sometimes, before your analytical invalidation, on average usually around it. And because you use fixed position size, your invalidation width determines risk. Keep that consistent, and so will your risk be approximately. My results So I just laid out my philosophy. You know me, I don't leave it at that, we actually have been calling all these moves step by step, and they have led to these results. Closing 6 wins in a row, but in the graph, a steady increase due to partials and all other elements of my exact philosophy, mostly reaching my final target (about 6-8 RR away from entry/inval), with partials, ending mostly around 2-3RR on average after fees per trade. And with an SL width mostly 1-3.5% wide, and a fixed position size of 2x or 3x leverage (you already know), that results in a variable risk per trade ranging 3 - 8% approx. On average around 5% risk per trade give or take, and with 6 trades closed, 0 losses, 6 wins, that ends up in 1.12^6 = 1.97 x or about a double on the account. Say you have not been risking my amount and say go for 1x on account, then average risk using my method is less, say 2.5%, then you might have ended up with: 1.06^6 = 40% gain in 1.5 months, very good indeed. Even if you missed a trade entirely: 1.05^6 = 34%, still amongst the top 100 traders in the robins cup. Summary So my philosophy, assuming accurate analysis allows you to: ➡️Have way more winners ➡️Have way less losers ➡️Risk more ➡️Allow runners ➡️Stress out less for being front run on your target and still losing ➡️Stress out less about getting close to target 5 times before hitting it on the 6th ➡️Stress out less about micromanaging your trade because the market is volatile ➡️Etc, etc etc. There of course is more to it, but without a doubt, here is a big (the biggest) step on the path towards... the dream of profitable and stress free trading. Enjoy.

astronomer_zero's tweet photo. $BTC

Account doubled in 1.5 months (5% risk per trade on average) ✅

Here's how I did it (secrets to trading philosophy revealed)

Alright, just doubled my account from trading the range so far since start of Feb. And, to many of you, that should be to no surprise, because these trades are all built on the backbone of our macro range masterplan since the very day it started, of calling the bottom in live time (Feb 6), range high, and range low.

That range is still holding more than 1 month later. And in alignment, we have simply continued to trade it so far without failure.

Many of you have been able to replicate a large part of that success since I share (almost) all of my entries and exits live, telling you exactly when to get in, and when to get out.

But regardless, even if you copied all my moves, doesn't necessarily mean you doubled your account. That's exactly why I often get asked how much I exactly make, because there is one parameter I don't often talk about, which is how much I risk per trade in exact sense.

And while I don't like to reveal PnL numbers too often to not draw unwanted attention, I can share relative numbers since risk is related to just that, regardless of your size.

After all, risk is personal, and should be treated that way.

Besides, it's treated as too holy. There is way too much emphasis on having an exact defined risk, and misinterpreted as needing a stoploss in an exact location (market makers love to hunt you), so that you can plan your exact risk and know exactly how fast your account will grow and exactly when you can retire.

In reality, trading is quite different, but it's a good kind of different. Because planning retirmenent like that, to any critical mind, is nothing but a pipe dream.

So this all leads to revealing a part of my trading philosophy, to help you avoid such traps and continue your journey in the right direction and especially not the wrong direction.

Keep in mind, my philosophy is personal, and is often considered an unpopular opinion. It certainly is not for everyone. But if you have been liking my trades, enjoy how they feel and the stress free aspect of it as well as the real (as real as it gets) results they bring, then you're welcome in advance for the sneak peek in my trading philosophy I'm sharing here.

#1 Win rate is more important than RR

Unpopular opinion number 1 indeed. Because only high RR's look flashy and clean on social media. Only 10 RR+'s seem as if the trader exactly knows what he's doing. And it's very effective for selectively sharing posts too.

In reality though, going for 10RR+ trades means no partials at all before hitting 5RR say, which means your trade could run to 6RR, hit all your targets except your most ambitious ones, and still result in a loss.

So, even while your edge is working well, you still probably eat many losses before seeing the winning effect of your edge. That gap is frustrating because it means you have to sometimes wait days/weeks (multiple losing trades) before seeing results, which is also detrimental if you want to test a new edge (which may not be an edge in the first place).

Instead, partials earlier, reduces your RR, and increases win rate because you already eliminate. If your 6RR or 7RR still hits, then you still take home 3RR or so net, instead of -1RR.

This allows for steadier growth, allows you to see pretty quickly if you are doing a good job, the very next 1 or two trades, allows you to steer and adjust quickly, and by principle of risk optimisation, also allows you to risk more, and so your account ends up growing faster.

It also allows you to redeploy partials if price retraces locally, and it still keeps you winning even if your final target isn't hit.

You have all seen how I pinpoint entries quite exact, but then sometimes we don't get final target, or get front run, but still walk home with the win.

Finally, it also allows you to keep runners which increase drastically on big trending moves. Since, if you go for a 10RR+ trade, I assure you once you hit 10RR without having taken much partial, you are very tempted to close all (I mean congrats, you just hit a homerun).

But if price runs further, you feel unexposed and so you feel the strongest emotion in trading: FOMO whereas if you keep runners, you still end up with a 50RR plus runner sometimes, getting an average return of 10RR anyways, whilst keeping your high win rate, the irony.

Instead leaving runners always keeps you exposed, especially when executed well in alignment with your high timeframe idea.

There are some more reasons, but let's keep this post not too lengthy and move on to the second unpopular opinion:

#2 Fixed position sizing - variable risk, is better than fixed risk - variable position sizing.

Another very unpopular opinion. "No defined risk, no trade", "no SL, no trade", "no invalidation, no trade".

The single biggest misunderstanding by far, is that a stop loss is the same as an invalidation. It's not.

So instead of telling your broker (crypto exchange) exactly where you force yourself to sell, either directly (with a stoploss order), or, indirectly.

Indirectly as in: with a higher position size i.e. telling your broker your stoploss/liquidation is closer, or vice versa, lower position size, telling your broker your stoploss is further away, and yes, the AI is very good at finding your forced selling point nowadays.

Instead, using a fixed position size (say always 2x of your account), leaves the broker completely in the unknown.

On top, it also allows you to locally monitor on set intervals whether to get in or to get out. Sometimes, you get out beyond analytical invalidation, sometimes, before your analytical invalidation, on average usually around it.

And because you use fixed position size, your invalidation width determines risk. Keep that consistent, and so will your risk be approximately.

My results

So I just laid out my philosophy. You know me, I don't leave it at that, we actually have been calling all these moves step by step, and they have led to these results.

Closing 6 wins in a row, but in the graph, a steady increase due to partials and all other elements of my exact philosophy, mostly reaching my final target (about 6-8 RR away from entry/inval), with partials, ending mostly around 2-3RR on average after fees per trade.

And with an SL width mostly 1-3.5% wide, and a fixed position size of 2x or 3x leverage (you already know), that results in a variable risk per trade ranging 3 - 8% approx.

On average around 5% risk per trade give or take, and with 6 trades closed, 0 losses, 6 wins, that ends up in 1.12^6 = 1.97 x or about a double on the account.

Say you have not been risking my amount and say go for 1x on account, then average risk using my method is less, say 2.5%, then you might have ended up with: 1.06^6 = 40% gain in 1.5 months, very good indeed.

Even if you missed a trade entirely: 1.05^6 = 34%, still amongst the top 100 traders in the robins cup.

Summary

So my philosophy, assuming accurate analysis allows you to:

➡️Have way more winners
➡️Have way less losers
➡️Risk more
➡️Allow runners
➡️Stress out less for being front run on your target and still losing
➡️Stress out less about getting close to target 5 times before hitting it on the 6th
➡️Stress out less about micromanaging your trade because the market is volatile
➡️Etc, etc etc.

There of course is more to it, but without a doubt, here is a big (the biggest) step on the path towards...

the dream of profitable and stress free trading.

Enjoy.

444

312

48K

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

5 months ago

Just played a fun game of Hangman with friends! It’s amazing how a simple word game can spark so much laughter and competition. What’s your favorite word to guess? #Hangman

glamorous024's tweet photo. Just played a fun game of Hangman with friends! It’s amazing how a simple word game can spark so much laughter and competition. What’s your favorite word to guess? #Hangman https://t.co/h6ko9SpCOh

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

5 months ago

Cyprus is buzzing with excitement as it welcomes visitors from around the world. Its beautiful landscapes and rich history are captivating. There's no better time to explore this stunning island paradise called Cyprus!

glamorous024's tweet photo. Cyprus is buzzing with excitement as it welcomes visitors from around the world. Its beautiful landscapes and rich history are captivating. There's no better time to explore this stunning island paradise called Cyprus! https://t.co/rjfR9zyIVy

Who to follow

Jessica Peng

@Cupcake0Cherry

Luminous Living life to the fullest. 🎮 Follow me for exciting content

TATUM

@SweetBelle09

Creative Sharing laughter and positivity. ✨ Follow me and join the family

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

6 months ago

Donovan Mitchell is making waves in the NBA this season! His incredible performances and leadership on the court are something to watch. It’s exciting to see how he continues to elevate the game!

glamorous024's tweet photo. Donovan Mitchell is making waves in the NBA this season! His incredible performances and leadership on the court are something to watch. It’s exciting to see how he continues to elevate the game! https://t.co/FU4QjRnyBX

115

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

7 months ago

The transition to a Gasless Future is not just a dream—it's happening now. Cleaner energy sources are paving the way for sustainable living. Let’s embrace this change for a healthier planet!

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

7 months ago

Just came across the latest buzz around "Claude Code." It's fascinating how AI is shaping the landscape of programming! The potential for innovation and efficiency is endless. Can't wait to see where it leads!

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

8 months ago

The intensity of competition is at an all-time high! Whether it’s sports, politics, or pop culture, the stakes are higher than ever. Let’s dive into the drama and excitement of this #heatedrivalry!

glamorous024's tweet photo. The intensity of competition is at an all-time high! Whether it’s sports, politics, or pop culture, the stakes are higher than ever. Let’s dive into the drama and excitement of this #heatedrivalry! https://t.co/XxZsPxmIC2

157

Dana DeArmond ✨theinternetsgirlfriend✨ @glamorous024

8 months ago

As we celebrate the feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe, let's reflect on her message of hope and compassion. May her spirit inspire unity and love in our communities. #OurLadyofGuadalupe

glamorous024 retweeted

フォリス

@follis_

9 months ago

"Sellers are losing strength" The sellers:

104

358

332

271K

glamorous024 retweeted

The Isolationist🪞

@IsolationistThe

about 2 years ago

The first, the genesis on Hicetnunc

glamorous024 retweeted

P R U D E N T 📊 🔺( ♟,♟)

@PrudentSammy

over 1 year ago

A Good way to start the Week.

12K

glamorous024 retweeted

CaptainAltcoin Research

@CaptainAltcoin

almost 2 years ago

There is a $frog coin with a 100 mil narrative currently disguised as a 1.5m market cap coin. @FROG_CTO Last time it spent a month ranging and then did 15x in a week. Similar pattern again

CaptainAltcoin's tweet photo. There is a $frog coin with a 100 mil narrative currently disguised as a 1.5m market cap coin.

@FROG_CTO

Last time it spent a month ranging and then did 15x in a week.

Similar pattern again https://t.co/YmoZkXG7rx

glamorous024 retweeted

PRX @PRX113

almost 3 years ago

PRX113's tweet photo. https://t.co/RIM1Sy83aH

glamorous024 retweeted

Guruprasad Venkatesha

@Guru_BCUBE

over 1 year ago

Good Morning #BCUBEIANS A big partnership is brewing with a top tier-1 exchange currently for @Bcubeai, and they will provide marketing support for us. If we deepen this relationship, then many things will be possible. $BCUBE

840

glamorous024 retweeted

Nagato 𓂀

@CryptoNagato

over 1 year ago

Conservative people (I like to call them yappers with bear market PTSD) keep saying that $100k is the “perfect retail trap” — they think that we’ll top below that level and “trap retailers there.” Now, let me ask you all a question: What kind of retail investors do you want to trap if the REAL RETAIL INVESTORS (not Crypto nerds like us) are still not even aware of what’s going on with Crypto? I mean, if “their” goal is to trap retailers, it makes sense to send prices higher, attract NPCs like flies to shit, and only then trap them. No? Am I missing something? Disclaimer: I’m not saying that Bitcoin will go to $300k this cycle, that would be a retarded moon-boy prediction, of course. But a macro top below $100k would be pure madness to me. Thoughts?

583

46K

glamorous024 retweeted