@lymanstoneky That chart is also interesting in that it runs counter to the myth of extreme Quebecois fecundity / “revenge of the cradle” / Catholic Church driving high birth rates persisting into the 1950s.
@Smirkley One interpretation here is that white Canadians are more likely to move to places where their share is higher when they become parents, but Asian immigrants particularly are tied tightly to large metros. Do you know what fertility looks like by race within each metro?
@gaulicsmith Women with 3+ kids in western countries are disproportionately religious, marry early, put a lot of value on marriage and community as such, and report their career or consumption as less important to them.
@epkaufm Australia and UK had conservative governments presiding over Gen Z’s formative years politically — and those years saw affordability deteriorate a lot. So thermostatic response to failure?
Theory works for Canada, not sure about Europe. US doesn’t fit I admit
@xwanyex There should be an equilibrium where WFH is on offer for less pay so business still gets the value and employees get the option. I don’t understand why this doesn’t exist.
@cremieuxrecueil Is there data on the converse? Which professions are likely to generate upward vs. Downwardly mobile kids? My prior is teachers kids do better
@danielfoch This is definitely possible. Canadas population growth, the distribution of that growth, and real economic growth will be the driver that matters. People say immigration will always mean more people, but politically that’s changing and globally peak births was back in 2016.
@gaulicsmith There is a number that would move the needle, but the action isn’t getting the childless to one, it’s getting those with two to three or four.