Imagine a "Passion Translation Bible Study" (sadly, these do exist) on Galatians 6:6
Person #1 has the 2013 version of which says:
"And those who are taught the Word will receive an impartation from their teacher; a transference of anointing takes place between them."
They share that God is giving them a "revelation" about the importance of going to conferences to receive an "impartation of anointing" from major Charismatic teachers.
But Person #2 chimes in with the 2017 version:
"And those who are taught the Word must share all good things with their teacher; a sharing of wealth takes place between them."
They share that God is giving them the "revelation" that they need to double their "seed" to their favorite televangelist because they desire a "sharing of wealth."
Finally, Person #3 chimes in with the 2020 version:
"And those who are taught the Word must share all good things with their teacher."
They share about the importance of contributing to their local church in order to support the pastors.
Can you imagine the chaos?
All three of these "translations" were done by the same man who claims to have been translating "directly from Greek" all three times.
What happened here?
The original edition represents what Brian wanted to insert into God's word. (transference of "anointing")
But the pushback was too much.
So what happened next time?
Brian picked another doctrine to insert, but this time it was prosperity. ("sharing of wealth")
But the pushback was too much.
So finally he picked a translation not too different from other versions.
The revisions don't reveal Brian's humility and desire to honor God's word.
The revisions reveal that Brian will insert as much of his own personal beliefs as he can until the moment he gets caught.
Then he'll change whatever he needs to change to keep the fraud going.
@YouVersion you should move a little quicker.
It's only getting worse.
What do you call it when doctors and nurses violate the law when they deliberately kill people?
First Ontario: MAiD providers broke the law hundreds of times. Now a B.C. government report - pried loose by FOI - shows the same pattern.
@CACatholicNews published the full report. It found 2,807 "errors" across more than half of all 2024 MAiD cases, including 353 that raised "compliance concerns" with "legal requirements" - quietly resolved by "educating" the practitioners.
Here's why that matters. MAiD is not a standalone legal act. It's an exemption carved out of the Criminal Code's homicide offence, and it only holds when strict eligibility criteria are met. When they aren't, the exemption vanishes and you're left with a culpable homicide:
- If the provider knew the person didn't qualify and proceeded anyway - that's murder: intentional causing of death without lawful justification.
- If they were reckless or willfully blind about eligibility, or grossly careless in the assessment - that's manslaughter or criminal negligence causing death.
Yet the response to hundreds of legal-compliance failures was "education" - not one referral to police. The colleges say it's not their job. The ministry won't answer. Even Parliament's own committee concedes everyone "treats enforcement as someone else's responsibility."
Read the article and the report yourself, and see what has become of our supposed medical profession. Link in comment.
Name a developed country that put the well-being of its citizens ahead of the profits of Big Pharma during Covid?
Sweden, perhaps? Okay, one.
The remaining 40 developed countries all fed their citizens into the maw of the Pharma profit-making machine.
Meanwhile, Big Pharma left Third World countries alone because they don't have any money.
That's the whole pandemic right there — the ruling class launched a biological war against the middle and lower classes in the developed world because that's where the money is.
Absolutely vile and disgusting.
This is what the FDA relied upon to license the Hep B vaccine before unleashing this product for injection into newborn babies in America—and then administering it again, and a third time, before six months of age.
The saga of Luke 4:15 in the Passion "Translation" is one of the wildest things you will ever hear.
It is the best representation of just how fraudulent and deceptive TPT is.
There has to be accountability for this.
The world needs to see behind the curtain.
In the U.S. right now, "healthcare," particularly preventive healthcare, is extraction. The goal of the system is to force you into the iatrogenic sales funnel so that you become dependent on hospitals, pills, and injections for life.
@uTobian Und dieses System der Gewalt, Unterdrückung & Schadstoffverabreichung unter dem Decknamen Gesundheitsversorgung & -vorsorge ist in allen westlichen Ländern mit den Krankenkassenkapitalen auf Beitragsbasis fest etabliert & bei den Bevölkerungen als Alibi der Tyrannei akzeptiert.
8/ The honest math
Order from Amazon a dozen+ times a year? Shipping savings alone cover the membership.
Everything above — photos, games, reading, delivery apps — is pure upside almost nobody redeems. 💰
EXCLUSIVE:
The 2025 data for euthanasia numbers are through the roof…… What’s worse is we can now prove that doctors in Ontario. Toronto specifically are putting MAID victims lungs in a “EX-VIVO” machine for 24 hours after they poison someone to death.
We now have confirmation, they’re doing this because the MAID murder drugs, cause your lungs to fill with fluid and you drown to death.
The source on this is not only a doctor. It is the Doctor who testified in the Senate about this, and proved it through the largest postmortem autopsy report.
We have so much more on this. And I will release it on the world‘s largest podcast this week. The death cult won’t be able to stop this. The proof is undeniable, and we have a Canadian autopsy to prove it with a MAID drug kit, and the dosage CAMAP recommended listed as the drugs given.
It’s going to make my Dr. Jordan Peterson @jordanbpeterson interview that broke the internet look like a blip.
They’ve been lying to you and now we have proof.
Tamara Lich’s sentence ends in January 2027, but the Crown is forcing the entire case back to the Court of Appeal — still demanding 7 years in prison for Lich and 8 years for Chris Barber.
The Justice Centre has funded lawyers to defend Mr. Barber since 2022.
Ontario taxpayers have already spent roughly $15 million on this prolonged prosecution.
This is what political lawfare looks like.
Brian has previously said that a man named Gerald Derstine prpohesied that "the angel of passion was with our ministry."
But in the clip above he says, "The Lord spoke to me and said that angel is with your ministry."
In the second clip he says, "The Lord told me...through an encounter...there's an angel that goes with you...and He gave me the name of the angel. The name of the angel was passion and fire."
How many contradictory versions of this story do we need to hear before we can sensibly conclude that there has been deception?
German MEP Christine Anderson argues that Western governments have completely betrayed their own citizens, using manufactured crises—from the "Covid scam" to the "climate change hoax"—to impose control under the guise of public interest.
If airplanes had the same safety record as vaccines, no one would fly.
If cars had the same safety record as vaccines, no one would drive.
However because vaccines are inflicted on infants who cannot speak, authorities do nothing and celebrate the harms.
Absolutely diabolical.
The most metabolically ill country on Earth has a control group living right inside it, and the results are deeply inconvenient.
The Amish eat butter, lard, eggs, meat, and raw milk straight from their own cows, by the bucket. They cook in animal fat. They eat the saturated fat the rest of us were told to fear for fifty years. Their obesity rate sits around 4%. The country around them is closing on 40%, four in ten adults. Ten times lower, on the diet that was supposed to be killing them.
They are not dropping from heart attacks at the rate the theory demands either. Their overall cancer rates run lower than the surrounding American population, despite skipping most of the screening that is meant to be saving everyone else.
Now, honesty, because it matters. The Amish are not low-carb. There are pies and bread and plenty of sugar on an Amish table. This is no clean carnivore case, and I will not pretend it is.
What it is, is a controlled experiment sitting in plain sight across Pennsylvania and Ohio. Same country. Same supermarkets down the road. The Amish simply opt out of two things: the ultra-processed food and the sitting still. Their men walk upward of 18,000 steps a day. They eat food their grandmothers would recognise, and they move like their lives depend on it, because for most of history they did.
The animal fat was never what made America sick. The seed oil, the sugar, the packet, and the sofa did that, and the Amish skipped all four. They ran the experiment by accident, by living in the same country as everyone else and politely declining to join in.
Most Canadians are focused on Bill C-34. Before that it was Bill C-22. Before that it was Bill C-9.
And that is exactly the problem.
Professor of Law at Queen's University @PardyBruce just explained why fighting each bill one by one will never fix Canada. The bills are not the problem. They are the distraction. The real problem is the system that keeps producing them — a governing structure that allows elected politicians to hand unlimited power to unelected bureaucrats who answer to no one and serve indefinitely.
Until Canadians understand that, nothing changes.
Watch the full conversation here 👇
Industry creates the regulatory agencies.
Industry decides who runs the regulatory agencies.
Industry writes the regulations.
Industry writes the studies that claim its product is safe.
For SCOTUS to then say, well, the EPA in 1993 didn't declare that RoundUp is a carcinogenic so therefore it must be safe, is PREPOSTEROUS.
When the dermatologist was just on Fox News debunking the idea that some chemicals in sunscreen aren't good for us, it sounded illogically dismissive of the studies and research.
I took a quick look.
I didn’t hear her disclose her paid relationships with big sunscreen makers. ☀️
This is part of a trend that I discovered decades ago. It permeates our news media landscape.
I learned that nearly every member of the national board of experts that lowered cholesterol guidelines and basically recommended that people should take more statins, worked for the statin makers.
I learned that many members of the board set up during Covid that restricted hydroxychloroquine... were paid by the companies that made other controversial treatments for Covid like remdesivir that were then prioritized over hydroxychloroquine.
It doesn’t stop there.
When the government and the cosmetics industry tried to falsely debunk the scientific studies linking antiperspirants and breast cancer, they referred me to the American Cancer Society for an interview. I learned that the expert at the American Cancer Society hadn’t even read the relevant studies, and yet was claiming the link was a myth. I asked and found out that the American Cancer Society takes money from the antiperspirant industry and other allegedly cancer, causing industries. However, they wouldn’t tell me how much.
When the nonprofit “every child by" was illogically denying the proven vaccine autism link, I dug in and found out the nonprofit was actually started by a vaccine maker in order to defend vaccine companies, and to controversialist those of us exposing the risks.
I was the first journalist to ask and report that the expert the government kept referring us to in order to debunk the vaccine autism link, Dr. Paul Offit, was not an independent expert at all, but was a vaccine inventor and vaccine industry insider… though that was never disclosed in the media at the time. He was always presented falsely as if he were an independent expert.
When I saw a lead dietary group giving questionable advice about nutrition, I learned that the group takes money from the sugar, cola, fast food, and preservative snack industry.
In short, whenever I’ve looked for a tie between experts defending a chemical or risk that could impact an industry's bottom line... I’ve always found one. Food for thought.
"Dr. Jody Levine has financial and professional relationships with several prominent consumer product companies that manufacture and market sunscreens.
Because sunscreen is legally regulated as an over-the-counter drug and is a core component of commercial skincare lines, her consulting roles inherently create potential conflicts of interest when she recommends sun protection or reviews skincare products in the media.
Her specific ties to major corporate sunscreen manufacturers include:
1. Johnson & Johnson / Kenvue
Dr. Levine has served on the Medical Advisory Board for Johnson & Johnson. Johnson & Johnson’s consumer health spin-off, Kenvue, owns Neutrogena and Aveeno, two of the largest and most widely distributed sunscreen brands in the United States. In her media and print features, she has regularly recommended product categories or specific options overlapping with these brands, such as recommending Neutrogena Sport Face in broad consumer media interviews.
2. Galderma (Cetaphil)
She has acted as a consultant and advisor for Cetaphil, a brand owned by Galderma. Cetaphil produces a substantial line of daily facial moisturizers with SPF, mineral sunscreens, and broad-spectrum sun protection lotions marketed heavily toward sensitive skin and pediatric care.
3. Beiersdorf (Eucerin)
Dr. Levine has maintained consulting arrangements with Eucerin, a brand under the Beiersdorf corporate umbrella. Eucerin manufactures a wide range of daily anti-aging lotions with SPF, sensitive skin sunscreens, and body sun protection products.
Impact on Media Appearances
When Dr. Levine appears on networks like Fox News or in print publications to deliver general public health messages—such as advising viewers to apply sunscreen 15 minutes before going outside or warning against the dangers of tanning beds—she is providing standard medical advice aligned with the American Academy of Dermatology. However, because she does not routinely issue on-screen financial disclosures listing her corporate partners during short news segments, viewers are generally unaware that she is paid by the parent companies of the very products sitting on drugstore shelves."