Labor’s digital minister Andrew Charlton sold his ‘consultancy’ business to Accenture in 2020 for 35 million, almost all of the price was for ‘goodwill’. He then worked for Accenture for a year before becoming the Labor MP for the then safe seat of Parramatta. Accenture get so many massive taxpayer funded contracts, like almost 100 million they got for the disastrous BOM website. That didn’t slow down further Govt contracts for Accenture. Now Qantas sack 850 workers and sling Accenture a vast sum to handle the jobs from India. We are so let down by our leaders.
Chris Bowen is lying to the world, and committing fraud against the Australian people.
This graph is from the Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment, and Water's own March 2026 Quarterly Update, I took this screenshot myself.
Look at the top graph, it shows cumulative change in Co2 emissions broken down by sector. Most of the sectors are clustered around the '0%' mark... some above, some below, the average of them all would be close to ZERO change in 21 years.
But there's one outlier... ONE line that dive down from the 0% (equal to 2005 levels) and down past a 50% reduction... PAST a 100% reduction (which is mathematical nonsense but I'll explain in a moment) past a TWO HUNDRED PERCENT REDUCTION, and has hovered between 150 and 200% reduction for the last few years.
If you look at the key, that dotted green line is a thing called 'LULUCF'. What's that?
"Land use, land use change, forestry"
In practical terms ALL of the supposed '25% reduction compared to 2005 levels' that Australia has achieved has come from changes in land use and forestry in this country.
What does that mean in real terms?
1. it means our economy is NOT 'decarbonising' at all, the wider project is a complete fail despite all the money spent, making Bowen and co a bunch of liars.
2. All the jobs we've lost, the manufacturing and heavy industry, the offshoring of real productive capacity... all of the independence and sovereignty we've given up in the name of reducing Co2 emissions... has at BEST brought the INCREASE to a standstill... not reduced the Co2 emissions of Australia's economy.
3. it means that productive land is being 'locked up', land that was cleared and producing food and fibre is being left fallow or being planted with things that have no value to us EXCEPT that they take Co2 out of the atmosphere and the government is willing to pay you to do that.
I will note specifically that the biggest 'loser' besides land use, is electricity generation which is claimed to be 26.6% lower Co2 emissions today than it was in 2005 which sound impressive until you realise that means there's 73.4% still to go and we've already spent insane BILLIONS just getting to where we are, and the bit we've already done? That's the 'cheap' bit... from here each bit of 'progress' gets more expensive.
If you just look at the lovely green bar graph as it drops away you'd think WOW we're going great! if you just believed the nonsense 25% claims then you'd be conned into thinking that Australia is kicking goals.
The truth is we're just locking up productive land, calling it a 'carbon sink' and cooking the paperwork to make ourselves look good.
Australia is a fraud on the world stage, Bowen is a liar, emissions reductions are a failure, and it's time to admit the emperor has no clothes.
Project 800ppm all the way!
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN....
A MAGNETIC MECHANICAL PERPETUAL MOTION GENERATOR...
Short of a little bit of grease in the bearing blocks and about a 100 years before the magnets start to lose their magnetism, you're good to hook it up to a load.
At the end it really RIPS ‼️
Let the shill blocking begin ‼️
@tahiniok Personally I have evolved out of it, but it requires taking action. So I did what I could with the aim to settle mind and emotion and that worked. Then up pops a new projected scenario but I'm no longer so emotionally engaged. Detachment and action is the way.
TURBO CANCER: When the Covid mRNA vaccines were first being forced on everyone in 2020, I asked a long-term friend of mine (who was then Chief Scientist for Australia) to ask Pfizer, whether they had done any safety controls, to show that vaccine mRNA (or DNA) was not being integrated dangerously into human chromosomes?
Many gene-therapy trials were terminated, because such unwanted integration caused cancer in the patients. I worked in that field for several years, and tried to find a safer way of doing it with no success.
So my friend (the Chief Scientist) wrote to Pfizer and asked whether their mRNA/DNA could be going dangerously into human chromosomes? The Pfizer scientist replied "no, that can't possibly happen, don't you know anything from textbooks?" and that was that.
Now 6 years later, we have "turbo" cancer in many people, in addition to heart failure from the Pfizer vaccines. Another friend just died of a fast-growing cancer last week. Here it is, some of the Pfizer mRNA or DNA did indeed integrate into human chromosomes. They would find more, if they chose to look.
Doctors of death. Politicians of death. Those vaccines had very little efficacy, and many life-threatening side effects. Yet they FORCED them on people worldwide.
Here they said "two shots to freedom".
What we saw in 2020 and 2021 was "medical fascism". I did not trust doctors before than, and trust doctors even less now (with some exceptions).