Reza Rahimi

Network & Telecommunication specialist

[کاوه لاجوردی @1058_1111]

فقدانِ عقلانیت و کارآمدی در تبلیغاتِ حکومتیِ ج.ا. حیرت‌آور است. در کنارِ تسنیم و فارس و مهر، نمی‌شد به چیزی کمابیش مستقل راه بدهند؟ و چقدر باعثِ شرمساری باید باشد که صداوسیما—که مختارنامه می‌ساخت وقتی رقیب در کارِ تونلِ زمان بود—قافیه را این‌قدر به‌شدت باخته.

اخلا�� به کنار.

[کاوه لاجوردی @1058_1111]

قریب به نیم‌قرن بعد از انقلابِ ۵۷، ما باید عاقل‌تر باشیم از آن نسل. نه؟

متأسفانه ساختارِ جهان طوری است که بدتر از هر وضعیتی وضعیتی هست. عمل مطابقِ این پندار که "اینها بروند؛ هـر کـس بیاید بهتر است" خطرناک و نابخردانه است.

کارنامه‌ی افراد را ببینیم—تجربه و زندگی و مرام‌شان را.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The Left's Permanent Alliance With Tyranny

The Western Left is trapped in a pattern that no failure ever corrects.
It is not ignorance. It is not naivety. It is a habit of mind – a reflex so ingrained it now operates without thought. Wherever power sets itself against the West, the Left leans toward it. Wherever a regime defines itself in opposition to America, Britain, or Israel, the Left suspends its moral faculties and rebrands that abdication "principle".

Venezuela is only the latest proof. The collapse of Nicolás Maduro's regime should have been uncontroversial. A bankrupt state. A stolen election. A population driven into exile by hunger, fear, and repression. A dictatorship propped up by force and foreign patrons. Yet the British Left responded not with relief, but with rage – not at the tyrant, but at the country that removed him. The moment the United States acted, the verdict was fixed. Whatever followed was irrelevant.

This is not a lapse. It is a pattern. For half a century, the British Left has attached itself to strongmen and movements whose only consistent trait is hostility to the West. Castro, Mao, Chavez, Saddam, Hamas, Iran – the names change, the instinct does not. Each was excused, romanticised, or rebranded as "resistance" while their victims were written off as collateral or lies.

The logic is brutally simple. The Left no longer judges regimes by how they treat their people. It judges them by whom they oppose. If a government crushes dissent, rigs elections, jails opponents, or starves its population, that is unfortunate but negotiable. If it also defines itself against America, that brutality becomes contextual, even admirable. Tyranny is forgiven so long as it points in the right direction.

That is why Jeremy Corbyn can call on Britain to "stand with Venezuela" while Venezuelans flee by the million. Why Diane Abbott can thunder about international law when Washington acts, yet fall silent when regimes gun down protesters. Why Ken Livingstone could fawn over Hugo Chávez even as Venezuela slid toward ruin. The people on the receiving end never matter. The alignment does.

This is why the Left's supposed anti-imperialism is a sham. American power is condemned as predatory, but Chinese expansion is waved through as development. Washington's influence is treated as neocolonialism, while Beijing's ports, mines, and debt traps are ignored. Xi Jinping builds a global empire and escapes scrutiny because his project weakens the West. That alone is enough.

Donald Trump's role in Venezuela only sharpens the reflex. Because Donald Trump acted, the act itself must be illegitimate. Trump is incidental. Had another American president done the same thing, the language would soften. When Trump does it, legality is rediscovered, sovereignty invoked, and dictators recast as victims. The rule is absolute: America must always be wrong.

This is not moral seriousness. It is inversion. Good and evil are not weighed; they are assigned. Freedom movements backed by the West are dismissed as puppets. Authoritarian regimes opposed to the West are treated as misunderstood. The Left does not fail to see oppression. It sees it and looks away, because acknowledging it would disrupt the story it tells itself about history, power, and blame.

The tragedy is not that the Left keeps backing lost causes. It is that it keeps backing the wrong side of human suffering. Again and again, it chooses ideology over people, posture over truth, and grievance over liberty. Venezuela strips away the last excuse. What remains is a political culture that would rather see a country burn than concede that the West might sometimes be right – and it will not stop.

"That is why Jeremy Corbyn can call on Britain to "stand with Venezuela" while Venezuelans flee by the million."

[کاوه لاجوردی @1058_1111]

خیلی از ما از حقوقی استفاده کرده‌ایم که شهروندانی به شکلی تبعیض‌آمیز از آن محروم‌اند—به واسطه‌ی دین‌ از تحصیل محروم نشده‌ایم، برای خروج از کشور از همسر اجازه نگرفته‌ایم، جنسیت‌مان مانعِ انتشارِ آوازمان نشده. به‌نظرم اینها مجازند با اینکه کثیری از شهروندان به‌ناحق از آن محروم‌اند.

[Alice Smith @TheAliceSmith]

You have a right to free speech, I have a right not to listen.

You have no right to force me to listen, I have no right to prevent you from speaking.

This understanding applies to all true rights.

The only duty is non-interference.

[Rock Chartrand @RockChartrand]

Capitalism means private ownership, voluntary exchange, and the protection of property rights under objective law. It’s the only system where wealth is created through consent, not force.

Socialism means collective or state ownership of production, command economics, and redistribution by coercion. It doesn’t create wealth. it consumes it until nothing’s left or until it recognizes that only a bit of capitalism can bail them out.

Now apply that to the real world:

United States: a mixed economy — capitalist foundations corrupted by regulation, taxation, and entitlements. Still wealthy precisely because its capitalist elements outperform its socialist ones.

Venezuela: socialist — nationalized industries, fixed prices, money printing, property seizures. Once Latin America’s richest nation, now a humanitarian disaster.

North Korea: fully socialist — no private property, no markets, chronic famine, and slavery.

China: authoritarian collectivism — production exists only by Party permission; “private” enterprise survives at the state’s mercy.

Cuba: socialist for six decades — rationing, poverty, repression.

Somalia: not capitalist — it’s lawless anarchy. No property rights, no contract enforcement, no free market structure. Chaos isn’t capitalism.

Haiti: a kleptocratic welfare state — flooded with foreign aid, paralyzed by corruption and government control. Overregulated, not free.

Cambodia under Pol Pot: the purest form of socialism — private property abolished, currency outlawed, citizens forced onto collective farms. Two million died of starvation, disease, and executions in the name of “equality.”

Soviet Union, Mao’s China, Ethiopia under Mengistu: all socialist regimes, all produced mass famine.

No nation that protects property rights and voluntary exchange has ever suffered a famine. Every famine of the last century was born of central planning, state ownership, or forced collectivism.

Capitalism feeds. Socialism starves. Every time.

[Reza Rahimi @goodrezi]

بزرگ‌ترین دست‌آورد «جبهه‌ انقلاب» تو این مناظرات و انتخابات این بود که «زاکانی راست‌گو»، هم تا آخر موند و هم نذاشت پزشکیان رئیس‌جمهور بشه 😂

[hossein_jannati @hossein_jannati]

.
زشتید و از آیینه هراسان شده‌اید
از وحشتِ خویش، باز پنهان شده‌اید
ننگا به شما که ننگِ انسان شده‌اید
من کافرم اَر شما مسلمان شده‌اید!
.
#الهه_نیلوفر

[Pedram Soltani @PedramSoltani1]

آنها در بند هستند؛
چون حقیقت را آزاد کردند.

#الهه_نیلوفر

[بهنام صمدی @behnamsamadi_ir]

اون صنعت چرا هنوز سوده هست؟ پولاشو ازش بگیرید برای کسری بودجه لازم داریم

[بخی @rbakhtiarifard]

فونت جدید چطوره؟ 😎
از ۹۸ دارم روش کار می‌کنم
نمی‌خواید ریتوییت کنید انرژی بگیرم؟ 🥹

[کاوه لاجوردی @1058_1111]

از چیزهایی که باید یاد بگیریم (و به کودکان یاد بدهند) طرزِ برخورد با اوباشِ مجازی است که فحّاشی می‌کنند به شهروندِ عادی بابتِ چهره، جنسیت، سبکِ زندگی، مشیِ سیاسی.

به‌نظرم تردید نکنیم در بلاک‌کردن—حتی اگر ناشناس نباشند، ح��ی اگر ظنّ قوی نرود که حقوق می‌گیرند از ج.ا. یا از آلبانی.

[Mojtaba Rahimi @mojtaba1367575]

کاملا موافقم! چون دولت تشکیل دادن

[Mojtaba Rahimi @mojtaba1367575]

جدای از دعواهای بیهوده اینجا باید گفت هرکسی روند تاریخی مشروطه انگلیس را درک نکند، هیچ چیز از سیاست نمی‌داند. خصوصا اینکه میراث دار نخست وزیر نظام مشروطه هم باشد.

[Pedram Soltani @PedramSoltani1]

پرسشی از کاربران ارزشی و انقلابی:
اکنون که مسلم گشت که ۱۰۰ نماینده امتیاز ویژه #شاسی_بلند نصیبشان شده چه برخوردی باید با آنان بشود؟
آیا صیانت از «منافع ملی» را از جویندگان «منافع مالی» انتظار دارید؟

[Mahboubeh Davoudi @DavoodiMahbobe]

لینک ثبت‌نام:
https://t.co/DIuWhqt6Mx
هزینه: رایگان (به جهت ترویج علم اقتصاد در ایران)

[Pedram Soltani @PedramSoltani1]

پرسشی از کاربران ارزشی و انقلابی:
اکنون که لیست نمایندگان دریافت کننده خودرو شاسی بلند منتشر شده،
نظرتان درباره #مجلس_انقلابی چیست؟
درباره #وزیر_انقلابی چطور؟