At the END of the war in #SriLanka, these Tamil children and their families (totalling 500 Tamils) surrendered to the Lankan Army with 100s of witnesses and were never seen again. This was the largest post-war mass execution of children in modern history. https://t.co/v1jTUs85FU
Prabhakaran is the only leader at whom you can’t throw the usual tropes about living in luxury while sending other people’s children to die in war. He made the ultimate sacrifice for Tamil liberation and both his eldest children followed in his footsteps. Here’s an excerpt from “Total Destruction of the Tamil Tigers”:
“Earlier in the year KP talked to Charles Anthony, the leader's son, and said, 'I can plan your exit - very safely.'
A stubborn reply came back: 'We can fight. Just send us some more weapons.'
KP had hatched a plan involving a helicopter, flown by the usual suspects, Ukrainian mercenary pilots…KP, who had been Prabhakaran's equivalent of best man at his wedding, had tried on a number of previous occasions to persuade the LTTE leader to get his wife and the two younger children out of the Vanni. He had arranged educational places in a cast-iron alias in a safe western country. Prabhakaran had told KP he would be a hypocrite if he did not expect his own children to stay and join the movement. KP tried again in the final days of the siege, but he was told no.”
The struggles of being a Tamil farmer in a coastal village of Mullaitivu. Yet leftists would lecture him to seek class solidarity with the Sinhala settler-colonists whose sole purpose is to establish Sinhala dominance in the north with the patronage of the state.
Hasaka Ratnamalala is also connected to Gotabaya Rajapakse. He was sent as an intermediary to try and negotiate a cash deal with a Tamil victim of GoSL torture living in the USA.
While this loud-mouthed goon may be an easy target, it’s those better disguised and more eloquent traitors that we need to watch out for. What our youths need to realize is that not every Tamil who criticizes the government is on our side. In order to present an acceptable image, they will criticize both sides but work toward the same goal as the goon. They are a small group of well-connected professors, intellectuals, activists and novelists who are united by their common masochism to sabotage their own people.
They are abetted in this enterprise by international progressive forces who platformed them during the genocide and continue to do so now, since Sinhala nationalist propaganda is acceptable as long as it comes from the lips of Tamil traitors. These same hypocrites who opposed a ceasefire in Mullivaikkal, since they hated the LTTE more than they valued Tamil lives, are now calling for a ceasefire in Gaza.
But don’t be impressed by their credentials or shallow progressive rhetoric. Always dig deeper into their history and connections to know their true face.
You can’t reform a racist and genocidal system, I don’t understand what is so hard to understand despite being debunked several times on Reddit, Twitter and other social media platforms?
The proposals did not even meet a small percentage of the demands and aspirations of the Tamil people. They were not taken seriously by the government, and Neelan, who wanted to leave for South Africa, left us with a useless proposal before making his exit.
Why should the LTTE engage in with a government that was insincere from the beginning?
The LTTE was not opposed to a different method; it simply wanted the three fundamentals, mandated by the Tamil people, to be respected. These were Tamil nationhood, the Tamil homeland, and the right to self-determination, something your beloved Neelan did not uphold. The LTTE was not against a federal solution; secession, as they repeatedly stated, was only a last resort. Even at the peak of its power, the LTTE did not demand a separate state but rather a pluralistic region with autonomy.
The LTTE sought a stable and permanent ceasefire, but the Sri Lankan government was only interested in a temporary, non-binding cessation of hostilities. Chandrika Kumaratunga delayed the formation of monitoring committees chaired by international experts, further undermining trust in the process. Meanwhile, Sri Lanka was actively preparing for war—expanding its military, acquiring modern weaponry, and relocating troops toward the east of Palali.
Even during the peace talks, Sri Lanka bombed areas such as the Vanni, killing LTTE commanders like Lt. Amudan, and refused to hand over his remains to the ICRC. Letters written by Ratwatte and his associates during the talks reveal clear provocations and sarcasm, demonstrating that they were never negotiating in good faith. Chandrika not only leaked confidential correspondence between her and the LTTE to the public, but also involved third parties in the peace process without arranging direct meetings with the LTTE or obtaining its consent.
Tamil guerrillas faced heavy restrictions, particularly in the Eastern Province, where military authorities imposed rigid control over security and even executed unarmed cadres. Mr. Balapatabendi specifically asked Mr. Tamilselvan to document his concerns and suggestions regarding the East. Yet when Tamilselvan responded in writing, Balapatabendi accused the LTTE of making new demands and shifting its stance—an obvious attempt to manipulate the narrative.
The LTTE also requested to meet foreign representatives of the peace committees to provide a first-hand account of the situation on the ground, particularly regarding the Tamil armed struggle. These neutral observers had been invited by both parties, and proper protocol dictated that they meet the LTTE leadership before assuming their roles as chairpersons of the monitoring committees. While the Sri Lankan government initially agreed, it deliberately delayed the meeting, further exposing its lack of sincerity.
Even before the sea battle between the Tigers and the Sri Lankan navy, the military routinely bombed Tamil areas, causing civilian casualties. Chandrika refused to lift the embargo on over 100 essential items—including printing machines, bicycles, fertilizers, and shoe polish. If Chandrika could not even control her own military, she was in no position to bring a just solution to the Tamil people. Sri Lanka not only confiscated the weapons of Tamil guerrillas but also seized their boats, crippling their mobility and resources.
It is naive to believe that Chandrika—who made racist remarks and waged a genocidal war—was ever going to bring justice to Tamils. Her election was never about achieving a just solution; it was about ending the war on the government’s terms. After six months of insincerity and deception by Chandrika and her government, the LTTE had every right to walk away from the peace talks.
The LTTE was not willing to participate while Tamils were being starved.
Chandrika also promised devolution and she actually won two elections but nothing happened. What’s your excuse for the current so-called Leftist president’s silence on federalism now that you don’t have the LTTE to blame? We aren’t opposing constitutional reform. We are simply realistic about the prospects for federalism while you keep falling for their lies.
It’s not just the elite or the fringe. The most hardcore Sinhalese nationalists from the soldiers to the settlers come from peasant background who are the majority. They aren’t interested in coexistence but dominance.
“The settlers are brought here by the state for a bigger purpose. Indeed, these settlers are ‘frontiersmen’ of the Sinhala-Buddhist nation in the northern part of Sri Lanka: the purpose of settling them in this particular place is to fill that land with loyal citizens of the Sinhala-Buddhist nation: ‘We have a long-term plan here…With the war finished, we have to make the Sinhala man the most present in all parts of the country’, confided a military official...A first wave of settlers, who came in the height of the war in the late 1980s, was trained as armed home guards to protect the frontier against the LTTE. A second wave of settlers, who came after the war ended in 2009, saw themselves as patriotic farmers in the service of expanding the Sinhalese settlement frontier further into the northern dry zone.” https://t.co/0m53jtUje1
Their Tamil liberal apologists like you, Rajani, Hoole and Neelan are far more dangerous than these illiterate peasants because you give them intellectual legitimacy on international stage. Federalism was always a ruse. Majority of Sinhalese in a national referendum won’t vote for it nor will their elite be willing to devolve that much power especially now in the absence of any Tamil bargaining power.
@GoSLBot_Hunter This just shows how out of touch the Tamil diaspora is with what’s actually happening in Sri Lanka. You probably can’t even visit because of your refugee visa, so your entire view is based on the filtered content social media keeps feeding you.
We can learn something from them. Our flaw is that we don’t hate our enemies enough despite suffering the worst genocide of the century. We should be every bit as “bad” as they say we are. Not being as hateful doesn’t make us better; it just means we don’t value our lives enough.
You're whitewashing occupation by calling it presence. Why is it only Tamil regions that have this massive military "presence" for such a long period of time?
@Blackscrums@GoSLBot_Hunter You are deflecting from the orignal topic by going on rant over military occupation.
The north is part of the Republic of Sri Lanka. There is no military ‘occupation’, there is military presence, and that military presence has since been reduced.
It is a widely known fact that Tamil diaspora money keeps many down trodden families back in the N/E afloat. In some cases diaspora help so much that it's sort of backfired because a subset of the Tamil population have become completely reliant on it.
@GoSLBot_Hunter The Economic Oppurturnies in the North are being provided by the Government at the expense of opportunities elsewhere.
You Velallar Tamil diaspora from
the West are ruining it by buying out all the Land, Business, and Polticians in the north so that your Caste holds Monopoly.
Bro's asking why Tamils didn't just let Sri Lanka kill them. These questions are always indicative of how salty the Sinhalese are of the Tamil diaspora.
So strategic/tactical voting is not a thing anymore? Voting patterns can be interpreted many ways, and given the historical context of what Tamils have endured on the island, it's more than reasonable to say that it's strategic voting to deal with the lesser evil.
@GoSLBot_Hunter Voting patterns mate, none of what you say matters when you have hard proof that people are voting for anti corruption, accountability and better economic development.
You can keep your speculation for yourself. The northern Tamils have spoken via their democratic vote
@GoSLBot_Hunter Tamils still want to live alongside everybody else. Tamil politics don’t echo for separatism because they knows it’s not something people want anymore.
People want economic development, accountability for war crimes and anti corruption.
You’ve been brainwashed to think otherwise.
It's not a small group, and it's not expats either. Look at May 18 commemorations across the N/E every year. Not one SL flag, but tons of red and yellow flags, what do you think those flags are representing?
@GoSLBot_Hunter I’m calling out your foolishness. A small group of expats dictating what Tamils in the country want.
Voting patterns are signs of changing needs and wants. Stop imposing your wet dreams on the 3.5 million Tamil population
It’s not the expats, you genius — it’s the Tamil people on the ground who have been vigorously advocating for external self-determination, which means independence.
Tamils are fighting for self-determination, and that includes external self-determination — meaning the right of a nation of people to secede.
Prabhakaran was not corrupt, which is why he is still revered to this day and was the leader of the Tamil people for three decades. He was called by the people their national leader, and to this day he is referred to as such. Prabhakaran even compromised on his people’s demand for a separate state and accepted regional autonomy and federalism at the peak of the LTTE’s power under the ISGA. This was vehemently rejected by the Sinhalese and the Sri Lankan government, because any form of power-sharing is unacceptable to the Sinhalese, who are determined to maintain a unitary state — the very issue that led to this whole ordeal in the first place.
Whether we choose to secede or to participate in a racist society and genocidal entity that killed 17% of our population is our decision — not that of some random Twitter user who is out of touch with Tamil politics and aspirations.