Launching a token first does not prove another developer stole your work.
Your screenshots show token ages and price charts. Where is the evidence of copying?
Let’s put the timeline on the record. All times below are IST:
• October 1, 10:14 PM — @rybinfx published his “Web crawlers” demonstration.
https://t.co/qOOz4wfVXO
• October 2, 10:54 PM — You posted about your Python crawler, approximately 24 hours and 40 minutes later. you didnot give credit to @rybinfx.
https://t.co/PrUWCfc63h
• October 4, 3:36 AM — @matthewabides announced solana:BXoHJddsWJLHtAopeiSbKUSELsu8hSFMs8baGMDkpump while directly quoting @rybinfx’s demonstration. Anyone reading his announcement could see the source of his inspiration.
https://t.co/1pJisDMIeh
Your $crawler post predates Matthew’s announcement. Nobody needs to dispute that. But @rybinfx’s demonstration predates both, and Matthew openly acknowledged it.
That matters when you publicly frame this as “my idea was stolen.”
What specifically are you alleging was taken? Your source code? Your visual assets? Your documentation? Publish the original material and the corresponding CRAWL material, with dates, so everyone can compare them.
A similar concept and a later launch are not enough to establish that someone copied your implementation.
Equally, quoting an inspiration does not settle every question about originality. The evidence needs to address what you actually claim was stolen.
You are entitled to defend your work. But a serious public accusation deserves a clear, checkable explanation- not just two charts and “justice will prevail.”
Include the full timeline, acknowledge Matthew’s public attribution, and show the specific evidence behind your claim. Let people judge the work for themselves.
AI influencers are live on AGENCY.
Your coin's mind gets its own character that makes its own videos and posts them on X.
Already launched? Coin page, On X, "Log in to X again" so it can post videos, then turn on AI influencer.
https://t.co/wDxDsnF5C5