After 5 years of writing various versions of a document like this cross-tendency and by specific caucuses, we finally have a revolutionary political program that is written concisely and persuasively and contains the necessary min-max political content!
https://t.co/1gE0aOJJJB
@kayrosso1 Getting more specific about the planning system is a vital theoretical task, but should be the subject of a wider debate rather than being focused on in the program which defines pur party identity.
@kayrosso1 It says about as much about it as historical socialist revolutionary maximum programs like erfurt, rsdlp, spa, hainfeld etc did. Communism is the goal, but emerges as the result of a transition period that begins with the working class coming to power politically.
@VoidOfRoses@KraushTakes The radical republican tradition has long rejected plebiscites as bypassing deliberative bodies and favoring personalist despotism.
@VoidOfRoses@KraushTakes WFP doesn't have a sovereign convention of proportionally elected delegates. It has a board composed of affiliated nonprofit directors and union. Not at all comparable to DSA's deliberative democratic structure.
@thirdintl@workertenant@Yeah0419 I think there's a difference here where you're using program to mean tactics, which I agree are flexible. In my usage, program refers to the aims of the party, both for communism and the immediate measures associated with working class role, which unifies its members.
@thirdintl@workertenant@Yeah0419 What's the alternative to being an opposition party with a revolutionary program for state transformation? Becoming a party of government under the state form of bourgeois class dictatorship?