The “men are visual creatures” argument accidentally makes the case against male leadership.
If seeing a woman in leggings is enough to overpower your judgment, apparently your behavior can be controlled by the nearest female body.
That is not leadership.
Even the Bible places responsibility for lust on the person doing the lusting. Jesus does not say, “If your eye causes you to sin, tell her to put on a longer skirt.”
He tells you to deal with your eye.
Christian men cannot claim women need male leadership while simultaneously teaching that male self-control depends on women managing the environment for them.
At that point, who is actually managing whom?
Whenever we tell y’all that loyalty is a choice, yunna go talk say men are polygamous in nature. Yunna don see woman wey dey polygamous in nature, una dey follow crash out😂🤣See as main boyfriend dey beg side niggah the way house wives dey beg side-chicks😂
@JMayfield81984@nobodylikesteph Oh and you don't think it goes the same for women. You think everyone wants an overused, general meatsicle that everyone has tried lmao
@maxnonso So she must adjust herself so men can like her. So her body is just for men is what you're saying. A person can't be confident again in this social space. No go sleep