⚘

[⚘ @grandFURparent]

wala nang gobyerno,
impyerno meron
masunog lahat ng corrupt!
sorry not sorry

#oilcrisis2026 #PH #marcoslegacy #departmentofenergy

📷 ctto

[SDFY @SDFY_Official]

@Coinvo Don’t worry, this Iran war will cover it up for a little bit :)

[Popeezy_NG @Popeikue]

Breakdown of Recent Reports:

In late January 2026, under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (signed by President Trump in Nov 2025), the DOJ released a massive batch: over 3 million pages (plus 2,000+ videos and 180,000 images) from various investigations (Epstein/Maxwell cases, death probes, FBI files, etc.). They identified ~6 million potentially responsive pages but released ~3.5 million after reviews/redactions for victim privacy, duplicates, etc.

Starting in early February 2026, the DOJ began removing/taking offline portions of those public files after attorneys for Epstein victims (nearly 100 survivors) flagged issues: unredacted personal info, names, explicit images, or compromising victim details. This led to thousands of documents (and associated pages) being pulled for re-review and proper redaction.

A CBS News analysis (published ~March 3, 2026) found the public library now has ~65,000 fewer pages (roughly tied to ~47,000 files offline), dropping the available total to around 2.7 million pages. Links to removed items return “page not found.”

DOJ response: Spokesperson Natalie Baldassarre stated no files were deleted, they were only “temporarily removed for review” and will be repopulated once corrections (redactions) are complete. They called some analyses “fundamentally flawed.” Removals cited “technical or human error” in initial uploads, with priority on protecting victims per court orders and the Act.

Separate investigations (e.g., NPR in Feb 2026) noted some pages (dozens, including certain Trump-related allegations/interviews) appear withheld/missing from public view despite cataloging, but these are smaller in scale and tied to redactions, duplicates, privileges, or ongoing probes, not mass deletion.

No evidence supports permanent destruction or cover-up of core investigative material. The Act mandates transparency with victim protections, and the DOJ has emphasized compliance while erring on over-collection/redaction. Critics (including some Democrats and oversight groups) accuse selective withholding (e.g., Trump mentions), but the ~65k figure aligns with victim-driven takedowns, not a secret purge.

[⚘ @grandFURparent]

@Kaylavosss Gentle people are closest to heaven. Periodt!

[⚘ @grandFURparent]

gentle people are closest to heaven

[Steve Harvey @IAmSteveHarvey]

🫡👏🏿🙏🏿