wrong word - use respond instead of attack.
Here was your earlier response using "respond" instead: "No, FDR did not wait for a congressional resolution before "attacking" Japan — because the United States did not attack Japan first.
What actually happened:
December 7, 1941: Japan launched a surprise attack on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii (plus other U.S. and Allied targets in the Pacific). This brought the U.S. into World War II.
December 8, 1941: President Franklin D. Roosevelt addressed a joint session of Congress, gave his famous "Day of Infamy" speech, and asked Congress for a declaration of war against Japan.
Congress quickly passed the declaration (Senate 82-0, House 388-1), and FDR signed it the same day. The U.S. was then formally at war with Japan.
FDR followed the constitutional process: he requested a declaration of war from Congress after Japan had already attacked the United States."
@LawTalkinDude@marklevinshow No, but you are 😅
@grok did FDR wait for congress resolution before attacking japan?
Pseudo-intellectual shithead lawyers are a dime a dozen, idiot.
@LawTalkinDude@marklevinshow Did FDR wait for congress before responding to the Japs for bombing Pearl Harbor?
Attacking Iran was defensive. That's reality, and no one cares what that you think otherwise but others in your bubble.
Marco Rubio just got HEATED after Democrat Rep. Sara Jacobs tried to bait him into answering a question about the 2020 election.
Rubio didn’t fall for it — instead he made Jacobs look foolish by reminding her of the actual role of the Secretary of State and the very committee she sits on.
JACOBS: “One last question for you. Mr. Secretary, who won the 2020 presidential election?”
RUBIO: “I’m not here to answer that. Talking about 2020...this is a foreign affairs committee!”
JACOBS: “Okay great. You can’t answer the question, even though we all know that President Biden won...”
RUBIO: “No! I don’t answer the question because as Secretary of State, I do not participate in domestic political issues.”
JACOBS: “This is not about Domestic political issues, this is about our democracy.”
RUBIO: “It most certainly is! You’re asking me to opine. Just like I don’t do campaign rallies, because as Secretary of State we’re not supposed to.”
“That’s been the long tradition of the department. And YOU should know that if you’ve been on this committee for any period of time.”
Marco Rubio just got HEATED after Democrat Rep. Sara Jacobs tried to bait him into answering a question about the 2020 election.
Rubio didn’t fall for it — instead he made Jacobs look foolish by reminding her of the actual role of the Secretary of State and the very committee she sits on.
JACOBS: “One last question for you. Mr. Secretary, who won the 2020 presidential election?”
RUBIO: “I’m not here to answer that. Talking about 2020...this is a foreign affairs committee!”
JACOBS: “Okay great. You can’t answer the question, even though we all know that President Biden won...”
RUBIO: “No! I don’t answer the question because as Secretary of State, I do not participate in domestic political issues.”
JACOBS: “This is not about Domestic political issues, this is about our democracy.”
RUBIO: “It most certainly is! You’re asking me to opine. Just like I don’t do campaign rallies, because as Secretary of State we’re not supposed to.”
“That’s been the long tradition of the department. And YOU should know that if you’ve been on this committee for any period of time.”
Listen as MPs shout over Nigel Farage in the house of commons today.
Jeering, snarling, even using my name as a taunt, because Nigel dared point out the clear two tier policing in the UK following the murder of Henry Nowak.
It's transparent to everyone.
Absolutely vile.
Ohio State Sen Nickie Antonio says Rep. Brandon Gill's question about immigration almost made her start crying.
Gill: Has Somali immigration been good for Ohio?
Antonio: I'm processing your question... I was almost brought to tears just now.
Lmao what?