@xdreage@theviclaw The problem is that no single workflow will match the requirements of any lawyer to the dot unless the workflow is made for them specifically.
@theviclaw The other space that has opened is the space is the space that we are working in. We create custom workflow for each law firm/corporate to automate their existing workflow and take care of the desired quality of the output. It works out much cheaper for them.
@MiniMaxAI ten NANONOBLE debits of Rs. 25,088.98 on card 9248, three after expiry. Your 15 Oct mail admits one. Nine unrefuted, no invoice sent. Escalated to the CEO and Nanonoble Board. Refund or HDFC chargeback and Singapore SCT. Hari G Ramasubramanian
@LycamobileUK five unauthorised recurring debits of GBP 189 on card 9248, June to Sept 2026. No account, no mandate, no notice. LBA served 13 Oct, no reply. Escalated to Group leadership today. Refund or Comms Ombudsman and ICO on 24 Oct. Hari G Ramasubramanian
@Cleartrip CAR Series M Part II 3(c): refund duty on the airline within 14 working days; 3(j) bars any charge for processing it. Rs. 430 back with the full Rs. 17,266, NEFT/UTR by 12:40 IST today, or this goes to the District Consumer Commission Chennai and AirSewa. Hari G Ramasubramanian
Ten months for a Rs. 17,266 refund on Cleartrip Trip ID 251204432538 (PNR V15ZNB). IndiGo says it paid Cleartrip; Cleartrip shows no credit. CAR Series M Part II 3(c): refund duty is the airline's, within 14 working days. @Cleartrip@IndiGo6E pay now.
@Cleartrip CAR Series M Part II 3(c): refund duty on the airline within 14 working days; 3(j) bars any charge for processing it. Rs. 430 back with the full Rs. 17,266, NEFT/UTR by 12:40 IST today, or this goes to the District Consumer Commission Chennai and
CAR Series M Part II 3(c): refund duty on the airline within 14 working days; 3(j) bars any charge for processing it. Rs. 430 back with the full Rs. 17,266, NEFT/UTR by 12:40 IST today, or this goes to the District Consumer Commission Chennai and AirSewa. Hari G Ramasubramanian
CAR Series M Part II 3(c): refund duty on the airline within 14 working days; 3(j) bars any charge for processing it. Rs. 430 back with the full Rs. 17,266, NEFT/UTR by 12:40 IST today, or this goes to the District Consumer Commission Chennai and AirSewa. Hari G
@Cleartrip CAR Series M Part II 3(c) makes the entire fare for a journey not flown refundable, and 3(j) bars any charge for processing it. That defeats the non-refundable label here. Rs. 430 back with the full Rs. 17,266, NEFT/UTR by 19 October. Hari G Ramasubramanian
@Cleartrip Noted, Mansi. I have replied to that email. The Rs. 430 deduction does not arise on an airline-side cancellation; the full Rs. 17,266 should reach card 9248, with a written position on the Rs. 10,000 CAR claims. Hari G Ramasubramanian
@LycamobileUK Please confirm that reference 1977243761 covers all five Lyca debits of Rs. 16,109.31 on card 9248, that the 10-working-day provisional credit under RBI/DPSS/2026-27/396 clause 6 applies, and that no interest or charges are levied. Cases 1973155341 and 1973173059 remain open.
Lyca Mobile UK holds Rs. 16,109.31 from five unauthorised recurring debits since June 2026, no pre-debit notice. Letter Before Action 13 Oct, deadlock letter 24 Oct, then Communications Ombudsman and ICO. HDFC cases 1973155341, 1973173059 open. @LycamobileUK refund.
@Cleartrip@Cleartrip noted, thank you. Monday 19 Oct, 11 am to 1 pm IST works for the call. Please confirm in writing the exact refund after any fee deduction and the reference number, to my card ending 9248. Airline cancelled the flight, so I expect the full Rs. 17,266.
@IndiGo6E Thank you. Case 42362554 was raised on 16 Oct with a 5 to 7 working day window, but the Rs. 17,266 refund itself has been outstanding since Dec 2025. Please credit the card ending 9248 and confirm by 19 Oct under CAR Series M Part II 3(c).
IndiGo cancelled my Cleartrip booking PNR V15ZNB (Rs. 17,266) ten months ago and refused DGCA CAR compensation of Rs. 10,000 in case 42362554. Promised replies not honoured. AirSewa, consumer forum and regulator routes are active. @IndiGo6E please close this.
@Cleartrip The flight was 05 Dec 2025, ten months ago, so PNR V15ZNB cannot still be active. Rs. 17,266 was due within 14 working days under DGCA CAR Series M Part II 3(c). Confirm on case 32879822 whether you need anything from me, and share a call slot, 11 am to 1 pm IST on a weekday.
Rs. 25,088.98 in ten unnotified recurring debits by Nanonoble Pte. Ltd. for https://t.co/LNbRixHxAB. HDFC dispute 1975109383 open, decision due 28 Oct. Trustpilot rates MiniMax 1.9/5. [email protected] has not replied. @MiniMax_AI refund or expect the chargeback to escalate.
@LycamobileUK One Β£12.50 top-up (a/c 07405 120309) in May -> you have debited my card ~Β£25/mo since June, Β£124 total. No e-mandate, no invoice, no consent. Letter before action sent 13/10. Cancel + refund in 14d or Ombudsman + chargeback.
Will SC apply same law to all over India encroachments? Is it applicable only to Brahmins? Brahmin lobby works for Shastra University to abuse law in SC and PMO. Really it is not encroachmen by 10 feet. It is theft go 100 acres. How CJI makes robber as honest for compromise. The criminal hunts bench for favourable verdict over 20 years. Manusmiriti is applied here to protect Brahmin instead of punishing him for theft and collecting rent for 30 years.
Any can occupy any vacant property in prime locality and create civil dispute and make compromise with some other land in rural locality.
Brahmanism control judiciary and loots public property with judicial support. #SC. #CJI
It is matter of Rs.1000 crore theft. Not encroachment. Is it way of dealing with honour?