@claudioTxRx@garufa_ok@lequipe Ayer la fifa posteó acá. Básicamente dijo que las simulaciones deben ser sancionadas, que ni el árbitro ni el VAR se equivocaron y que, cito, "se hizo justicia".
⚽️ 🗣️ FIFA Spokesperson:
“FIFA's interpretation of Mistaken Identity was consistently applied during the FIFA World Cup. There were two instances in which a player was mistakenly identified as having committed a yellow card offence and the VAR advised the referee to correct the factual error caused by the opponent's simulation.
“The simulation itself cannot be disputed and it should not result in a disciplinary sanction against an opponent that may then lead to further consequences, such as a sending off for a second yellow card or a match suspension for accumulated cautions.
“We do not consider this to have been a referee or VAR error and the decision restored justice. We note IFAB’s comments in its Circular, we have been in contact with them throughout and they confirmed that this interpretation is valid, that it was well received and that it will form part of the discussion on revisions to the VAR Protocol, as discussed at the last AGM.”
@maquinolandela2 "We do not consider this to have been a referee or VAR error and the decision restored justice." Comunicado oficial de FIFA que ratifica la decisión arbitral y va a incluir de ahora en más en el reglamento después de revisión final. Y si probás leer vos?
@FedeSchl@fabig08 Además sostiene: "We do not consider this to have been a referee or VAR error and the decision restored justice." 5 años estudiando periodismo para que los dome cualquier ñato en X.
@MrAsubio@TheIFAB "The simulation itself cannot be disputed and it should not result in a disciplinary sanction against an opponent" tu traducción está hecha como el ogt.
⚽️ 🗣️ FIFA Spokesperson:
“FIFA's interpretation of Mistaken Identity was consistently applied during the FIFA World Cup. There were two instances in which a player was mistakenly identified as having committed a yellow card offence and the VAR advised the referee to correct the factual error caused by the opponent's simulation.
“The simulation itself cannot be disputed and it should not result in a disciplinary sanction against an opponent that may then lead to further consequences, such as a sending off for a second yellow card or a match suspension for accumulated cautions.
“We do not consider this to have been a referee or VAR error and the decision restored justice. We note IFAB’s comments in its Circular, we have been in contact with them throughout and they confirmed that this interpretation is valid, that it was well received and that it will form part of the discussion on revisions to the VAR Protocol, as discussed at the last AGM.”
@aphez1997@DiarioOle Por eso, el VAR si podía revisar por la confusión de identidad (paredes no debía ser amoneatado) pero el VAR no podía en la misma instancia cambiar la decisión de falta, osea se retiraba la amarilla por simulación pero igual era tiro libre para Suiza aún sabiendo que fue simulado
@aphez1997@DiarioOle Fijate el primer párrafo, dice que la sanción no se puede revisar. Osea, debe quitar la amarilla pero la sanción sigue siendo tiro libre para Suiza a pesar de haber confirmado que simuló la falta. Es ridículo.
@esteban_a_secas Y va a seguir así hasta que nos demos cuenta que para bajar los precios hay que incentivar la generación de mayor y mejor oferta, en lugar de subsidiar la demanda con fines recaudatorios. No tengo pruebas pero estoy convencido que no pasa sólo con la luz.
@krissymx100@PedroMihovilce1 Dejala @PedroMihovilce1. Importan africanos para que corran atrás de una pelota como si fuera un coliseo moderno y llaman racista al que no hace lo mismo para limpiarse la moral después de haber parido la inquisición y el holocausto. No tienen plata para el psicólogo!
@InfoRealNoHumo@PatrickAbrazos@vrncfrjn Porque la congresista de 🇺🇸 que dijo que 🇦🇷 es un país racista es demócrata. Osea, zurda dentro de lo que podés considerar zurdaje norteamericano.