@TerriGreenUSA His original motion was ruled out of order in the morning session, but he waited until the afternoon session to challenge that ruling. That's why it was not allowed. Had he gone to a microphone during the third report instead of the fourth, I believe he could have appealed it.
@megbasham I guess you overlooked the judge's finding that the break-her-down email was "powerful evidence supporting her negligence claims" or that "Patterson’s approach to further communications with Roe may well have been misguided and inappropriate..."
@PiggTimothy@randyb397@briancgreensp@fellowshipswfl But wouldn't the Baptist distinctive of local autonomy mean that your church is empowered to disqualify him from ministry in your church regardless of what his local church had done or not done?
@Avee121 @nathan92974536 @Smallzz3214@RiegerReport Two ways: shifting consequences of irresponsibility to to the responsible, and encouraging future irresponsibility by rewarding it. Some have short term gains; everyone has long term losses.
@HugYourLove @Lefty4Life24 @benshapiro Like I said, you can be against PPP loans, but that really has nothing to do with student loan forgiveness. The problem is that you are upset about a program that did not hold people accountable while supporting a program specifically designed to not hold people accountable.
Things are coming together for our upcoming 2022 Florida Baptist Convention Pastors’ Conference @olivebaptist and I’m super-excited about it! Make plans to join us November 13-14 in Pensacola.
@ksugiuraajc They are calling them "primary" opponents, not "permanent" opponents. The three opponents are for the 4-year cycle, and I presume they will change in subsequent 4-year cycles.
@annamarieisms@ComeCorrect12 @DavidDzimianski Fair enough, I admit that I should have been more charitable in my initial reply, and I apologize for being snarky. Honestly, I think your analogy is valid; I just believe that it argues against abortion rather than for it.
@ComeCorrect12@annamarieisms @DavidDzimianski Removing life support is only ethical under very specific circumstances. Unless you are willing to apply those to the question of abortion, it is a comparison that is at best meaningless and at worst, manipulative.
@ComeCorrect12@annamarieisms @DavidDzimianski The proposed logic is that because pulling the plug is not murder, abortion is not murder. I simply pointed out that the premise is false, so the conclusion is unfounded.
@annamarieisms @DavidDzimianski Perhaps you should consider that asking questions doesn't always have to lead to someone *else* learning something. Maybe the answer could help *you* learn or appreciate a different point of view as well.
@annamarieisms @DavidDzimianski I never attacked you or even stated a position. I simply answered your question about whether taking someone off of life support would be considered murder. It clearly would be in certain situations, but not necessarily in all.
@annamarieisms @DavidDzimianski I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure if you just walked into a hospital and pulled the plug on someone, you would be charged with murder.
@bobbyrcates @bradjurkovich@BaptistNetwork@tomascol@VoddieBaucham @jynchavez No, but if you overhear someone talking about this video at a restaurant or somewhere, you should let his church staff know so that they can press charges.