@StillSalty624 I don't personally see anything scandalous in those tweets. He is just talking about possible outcomes with a dogecoin fork not advocating for any in particular.
That being said, I still value your take on things!
@inevitable360@CoinMarketCap@IOHK_Charles@Cardano There is probably a hysteresis function where it needs to be above for X amount of time so it doesn't jump back and forth when they are so close in marketcap.
@JustinScerini It's been quite a journey to witness so I can't imagine being in your position... So relieved and thankful to see how well everything turned out!
@michael3420269 @mishaboar@elonmusk@Twitter I have seen lots of talk about ordinals/DRC-20 but have not seen any "product" of the spam transactions so I am of the mind that it could be literally anyone doing this.
@StillSalty624@mishaboar @michael3420269 Very true, lol. If we starting seeing many consecutive full blocks then all bets are off. Scaling the fee will prioritize "real" transactions though.
@mishaboar @michael3420269 Looking at https://t.co/pApcrl5psr, we aren't usually seeing anything close to a full 1MB block, only 1 block spikes of 500kB-ish so I think the #Dogecoin blockchain is handling the spam load quite well actually!
@mishaboar @michael3420269 Theoretically, if all transactions were the minimum size then a block can handle ~4484 transactions. That translates to 6,456,960 transactions a day. A sustained mempool of >4500 transactions should gum up the works but only for people paying the minimum transaction fee.
@mishaboar@Ledger This is an incredible misstep by a company so adored by the community! Giving hackers an easy vector to gain access to someone's wallet (think LastPass...) is a huge no-no. Seed phrases should not be backed up digitally EVER. Thank you for pointing this is it to the community!