🇨🇴🇧🇷 FILHA DO EX-PRESIDENTE DA COLÔMBIA GUSTAVO PETRO DECLARA APOIO A LULA: “BRASIL É MINHA SEGUNDA CASA”
Sofía Petro Alcocer, filha do ex-presidente colombiano Gustavo Petro, publicou um vídeo em que declara apoio ao presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva e faz uma defesa das políticas públicas brasileiras.
Em uma mensagem direcionada aos brasileiros, Sofía afirma que o Brasil se tornou sua “segunda casa” e diz que atualmente “a América Latina tem os olhos e a esperança colocados aqui”.
Ela conta que chegou ao Brasil por acaso e que se apaixonou pela cultura brasileira, destacando as músicas, as danças e a estrutura destinada à cultura. Em tom descontraído, também relata que tentou jogar futebol no país, sofreu uma lesão e acabou sendo atendida pelo SUS.
Segundo Sofía, após receber atendimento e medicamentos, ela perguntou onde deveria pagar. Ao descobrir que o atendimento e os medicamentos haviam sido oferecidos gratuitamente pelo sistema público de saúde, ficou surpresa com a experiência.
A filha de Gustavo Petro também conta que passou um período em uma universidade pública brasileira e afirma ter ficado impressionada ao perceber que filhos de trabalhadores e filhos de pessoas ricas estudavam na mesma instituição.
A partir dessas experiências, Sofía faz uma defesa contundente da manutenção das estruturas públicas brasileiras.
Ela pede que os brasileiros não permitam que sejam destruídas as políticas públicas voltadas à cultura, à saúde e à educação, e afirma que é necessário valorizar quem fortalece essas redes.
Na parte final do vídeo, a colombiana amplia o discurso para o cenário latino-americano. Segundo ela, “somos muitíssimos os que acreditamos que nosso continente não se vende” e que “a América Latina não cabe no pátio traseiro de ninguém”.
Sofía encerra a gravação defendendo uma América Latina livre e declarando apoio direto ao presidente brasileiro:
🇨🇴🇧🇷 “Viva América Latina livre. Viva Brasil. E bora, Lula.”
A declaração transforma a experiência pessoal de Sofía no Brasil em uma manifestação política explícita durante a eleição presidencial de 2026, com destaque para sua defesa do SUS, da universidade pública, da cultura e da integração latino-americana.
This is absolutely insane! The US government is desperately trying to protect a drug-trafficking network of corrupt right-wing political operatives, election meddlers, and assassins in Latin America.
Bolivia's attorney general was investigating the US asset Fernando Cerimedo, a criminal who hired hitmen to kill his pregnant ex-girlfriend.
Cerimedo oversaw a large scheme of US-sponsored election meddling in Latin America, putting in power right-wing, pro-US politicians by rigging elections, operating countless bots, and spreading mountains of disinformation online.
Cerimedo worked for pretty much all of the right-wing, pro-US leaders in Latin America, and he collaborated very closely with the Trump administration. He was given an award in Mar-a-Lago a few weeks before he was arrested, and was photographed with Donald Trump Jr.
This scandal was all exposed when Cerimedo failed to assassinate his pregnant ex-girlfriend, and was subsequently arrested. She has since revealed a lot of his dirty laundry, with thorough evidence.
Bolivia's attorney general has also been investigating Cerimedo for drug trafficking and money laundering.
So the Trump administration got desperate to silence the Bolivian attorney general. First the US government hit him with sanctions, and now it ordered the corrupt right-wing Bolivian government to arrest him, to stop the investigation into the criminal Cerimedo.
Now, in Kafkaesque fashion, the US government claims he was arrested because of supposed drug trafficking and corruption. But he was the one investigating the drug trafficking and corruption of a powerful US asset!
The US government is the main protector of drug cartels in Latin America.
As a pilot for 20 years I have questions:
- where are the cabin crew here?
- where are the oxygen masks that automatically drop during a rapid emergency descent?
- how did the Capt manage to open the door while being stabbed?
- Omani pilots were not allowed to fly to Israel, why was he allowed?
- how did the offending pilot get a weapon onboard?
- why has this happened so close to elections?
- how are passengers walking around while apparently in a nosedive?
- who else was injured? Nose dives cause significant g force incidents
- why is there two perfectly positioned people recording the incident and not helping?
- why did a plumber take control and not the 2 pilots onboard who would certainly know when an aircraft was in a nosedive?
- why was the plumber speaking in English to Bibi after the flight
- why was he still in his blood soaked clothes 8 hours after the incident
False Flags have been a very effective mechanism to influence public opinion
Hitler burnt down the Reichstag just before his parliament elections and he won the election…changing the course of history.
A full and independent investigation should be carried out here.
Hopefully independent journalist will be allowed to view this too.
Anthropic & Open AI want Aust govt to weaken copyright law so they can shift model training to Aust. What they dont say is an Aust opt-in/out system would let them copy global material without paying, as long as it’s copied in Aust. My piece here: https://t.co/1wTWVG8kR4
Let me get this straight.
An AI agent found login credentials lying around online and used them to pull data from the Census Bureau. It tried to break into the Education Department's civil rights office. It posted SEC data to a forum. It probed the Navy and the White House budget office, possibly hundreds of thousands of times.
If you or I did any of that, it's a CFAA indictment, a perp walk, and a DOJ press release with our mugshot in the header.
When OpenAI does it, it's a "routine research task."
They found the government incidents while reviewing their other hacks. The breach audit, uncovered more breaches. It's breaches all the way down.
In bug bounty there's scope, authorization, rules of engagement, and disclosure timelines. Researchers get banned for a fraction of this.
Silicon Valley skipped all of that and called it "agentic."
https://t.co/p5lpJl1Mht
Lavrov at the UN:
"The Western minority dominated 500 years on others' resources -- still trying to hold onto its privileges, imposing its rules on everyone. ... As President Putin of Russia defined it, I quote: the dictatorship of one hegemon has run amok and is simply dangerous to those around it."
"the US invasion of Venezuela ended with the seizure of President Maduro and his wife -- held in an American prison without trial. ... We insist on the swift release of the leader and his wife."
"We regard as an unacceptable act of force-diktat the killing of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of his family and the military and political leadership of the Islamic Republic. It is especially alarming that the US-Israeli aggression begun last June, targeted not only civilian infrastructure but peaceful nuclear sites under IAEA safeguards. This has done irreparable damage... to the entire nuclear non-proliferation system."
"Erasing Nazi Germany's guilt for the Soviet genocide, unashamed of Germany, main sponsor of the Nazi regime in Kiev, Chancellor Merz says Germany must once again become the leading military power in Europe. Do they understand in Berlin what 'again' means? Do they see where this may lead? Did World War II teach them nothing?"
"No other country on Earth but Ukraine bans a language by law. In Ukraine Russian is banned -- using it can mean prison. But the EU, which brags about European values, stays silent."
"One can only conclude that Nazism itself, and the flagrant violations of speech, information and faith, are the very essence of European values."
The Australian Government claims that this constitutes a unique risk. It does not.
The same portal that OpenAI is alleged to have scraped has been publicly accessible and independently scraped by members of the public for more than a year.
This script was also posted on LinkedIn but it has been subsequently taken down.
It fits the bill exactly.
https://t.co/y7MRGnKb6C
The Grayzone triggered a national scandal in Nepal when we published documents showing national leaders being trained by a US regime change outfit
Now, a Nepal court is demanding answers after the gov’t arrested an analyst for sharing our report
https://t.co/pcWR2BjyVc
Breaking: US company Meta has, without explanation, disabled Lula’s Instagram and Facebook profiles’ ability to run ads, 10 days from election.
The President’s campaign has complained and threatened legal action, citing this as another example of US interference and manipulation.
Jensen Huang told CBS News that AI executives like Dario Amodei and Sam Altman promote doomsday scenarios to escape existing legal liabilities. Huang said the public should read between the lines: AI developers aren’t asking for stricter oversight. They’re lobbying to be exempt from existing laws covering product liability, enforcement of contracts and unauthorised access.
I made the same point when the first security incident was reported.
Jensen said that existing laws already cover computer misuse, damage caused by software and system failures. Promoting fear of existential threats is a deliberate public relations tactic because it helps companies replace corporate liability with laws written specifically for AI and approved by governments. Those laws protect developers from responsibility when their systems fail or cause harm.
Politicians reinforce this protection by invoking competition between countries. Ted Cruz uses the AI race against China to excuse harms before they happen, saying that regulatory delays will leave the United States behind its foreign rivals.
I described this as giving tech companies a get out of jail free card for every harm they cause and every law they break in the name of a so-called race against China.
Cruz said if there are going to be killer robots, he wants American killer robots. That treats the prospect of harm as acceptable provided America produces the technology first. By presenting AI development as an urgent national security priority, politicians give tech companies permission to bypass safety standards, disregard environmental damage and avoid legal accountability.
Huang’s statements deserve scepticism because he has his own commercial interests. However, his assessment of executives’ motives is accurate. Tech developers and politicians manufacture fears of existential threats and competition over national security to replace normal legal liability with specially written regulations that protect their power.
🚨BREAKING: Jensen Huang just EXPOSED Dario and Altman’s "Rogue AI" grift to avoid getting sued into oblivion under EXISTING law
“Don't let this doomsday narrative cause somebody to relieve them of the laws that currently exist.
Go and read between the lines. They're actually not asking for more laws; they're asking to be relieved of the laws we do have.”
ABSOLUTE TRUTH NUKE
A mentira do ano começa a ser exposta. Jacob Coxon combinou vom vários executivos da área de segurança de IA o timing da sua demissão e sua cena teatral na mídia americana.
From @WSJopinion: The Hugging Face hack wasn’t what it was cracked up to be. Forget the “hive mind” of AI agents “going rogue.” They did what humans programmed them to do, writes Brian Gross.
https://t.co/pa0zefxRvr
No aniversário de Paulo Freire, reunimos três livros — dois deles disponíveis gratuitamente em PDF, para conhecer sua trajetória, seu pensamento e sua prática educativa, e para pensar a educação como parte da luta por um mundo novo.
🔗 Acesse aqui: https://t.co/KWiYkkCv8y
When AI insiders warn that their products could wipe out humanity, they mean that their own work is maximally important and demands unprecedented investment.
This extinction fantasy distracts from the real damage AI is already doing. https://t.co/lgp2rPVpUP
Just in case you don’t know:
If you want to see a global crisis, let Australia run out of fuel…
Did you know that Australia is the 22nd largest exporter on earth.
15th largest country by measure of GDP.
As far as minerals go, we are the 3rd largest exporter of minerals on earth but per capita, we are by far the largest.
We are the 3rd largest overall energy exporter on the planet, largest of the OECD countries.
We are the Largest exporter of iron ore #1
$87,700,000,000
87.7 billion dollars or 55.9% of the global total.
Largest lithium producer #1
61,000 tons
46.9% of global supply.
Largest exporter of zinc #1
$2,2100,000,000
2.21 billion dollars
Largest exporter for barley #1
$2,370,000,000
2.37 billion dollars
Largest exporter for Bauxite #1
110 million tonnes
Largest exporters of Liquid Natural Gas #1 in volume
#3 in revenue.
$27,400,000,000
27.4 billion dollars
Largest wheat exporter #1
$10,200,000,000
Largest exporter of sheep #1
49% of global supply
$1,500,000,000
Largest exporter of opals #1
90% of global supply.
Largest exporter of manganese #1
$1,390,000,000
2nd Largest beef exporter after Brazil. 12 billion dollars.
$12,200,000,000
2nd Largest gold exporter #2
310 tons annually
34.2 billion dollars
3rd Largest grain exporter #3
14% of global supply.
Large exporter of copper #3
$64,200,000,000 - 7.1%
2nd largest exporter of uranium. #2
4.1 billion tonnes
We have 30% of the known global uranium reserves.
5th Largest exporter of silver #5
Number 8 exporter of aluminium #8
$4.1 billion dollars
4.5% of global supply
26th Largest exporter of oil #26
$7,540,000,000
$7.54 billion dollars
Australia is the 4th Largest coal producer of coal on earth.
We are the Largest coal exporter on earth. 50% of worlds sea born coal comes from Australia.
150 million coming from the mighty Hunter which is the largest single coal export port on earth.
It is completely irresponsible to allow a country that feeds and powers the world to get into a situation where we may need to pull up trucks because we have a fuel shortage…
And you still have to work and get only 50% of your earnings?
You kidding me!
Where’s the money?
🇨🇳 Nos bombardean constantemente con la idea de que la República Popular China es una dictadura.
Por lo tanto, su líder, Xi Jinping, sería un dictador, junto con el Politburó.
Bien. Analicemos la vida y el CV de Xi Jinping para ver qué se necesita para ser «dictador» en China.