@leerob@elonmusk@cursor_ai Would be nice to make Cursor and Grok Bot communicate each other. Many ideas I have by talking to Grok Bot, but I want to execute in a Cursor session.
@ericzakariasson I can try, I commonly use local sessions, since I have everything configured on my machine.
My idea is more an open channel between both.
Isn't possible (or a good complementary idea) to have some MCP to connect to the local cursor, and make grok bot start an idea from there?
@bcherny@ClaudeDevs not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm playing with "sub-sessions" and sometimes one session says "The session X told me something Y is happening".
Maybe a thumbs up after the messages is good to provide my feedback to the agent that I read it? (is this a valid use case?)
These sub-sessions by far is my worse experience on Claude Code Desktop since I started using it.
Every time the agents asks me to open new sessions (super boring the insistence), even when not necessary.
And then, when I opened, the agents was creating part of the code in the wrong PR not related to the sub-session.
Any chance I can disable the suggestions to continue in a sub-session?
Mais uma aquisição de time de engenharia. Um dos maiores assets que existe hoje na área de tecnologia. Assim como a anthropic fez com o Bun. O artigo diz que eles vão continuar evoluindo o Deno, mas com certeza (aqui é minha opinião) parte da equipe vai trabalhar em produtos internos.
Here's my technique for adversarial code review if I'm driving from Codex: "Review this with claude".
And when I'm in Claude: "Review this with codex".
Models know how to to kick off a review using the cli. Know how to take turns. Know how to settle an argument.
No magic.
We’re rolling out monthly Claude Platform API credits for Max and Team plans:
Max 5x: $100
Max 20x: $200
Team: up to $500, pooled
Works on any model, including Haiku 5.5, in your code or third-party harnesses.
How it works and full terms: https://t.co/qmWL6xVGwr
Eu estou impressionado que existe fanboy de empresas de IA. É só entrar na thread da anthropic e vc vê “oh an open ai está tão morta”, e isso se repete nas threads da open ai e por aí vai.
Surreal
I’m not sure if I’m using this wrong. But I was expecting be like Claude code. I’m working in a feature on my computer and starts on mobile with my computer awake.
When I tired it it says something like “you need to commit because it will go to cloud”
So I can’t perform tests using the agent, bc it’s out of my computer
Quanto menos texto melhor. Regras claras, simples e diretas, coisa de bullet points de 1 linha, juntamente com contexto.
Mais informação passada ao modelo = mais chance dele ignorar.
I am surprised that people are surprised this is how I prompt Claude.
Talk to Claude the way you would a coworker. There's no secret to prompting. There's no need to be overly scaffolded or prescriptive for most tasks -- give Claude a goal, and it will figure it out.
Back in the Sonnet 3.5 days, your prompt mattered a lot. Nowadays, it's much more important to communicate to the model:
1. What you want it to do
2. How much effort you want it to spend
3. How it should verify that it did the right thing