G'wan B'y

-The people censoring free speech are never the good guys.

Reposts are not endorsements.

[G'wan B'y @gwan_by]

And yet some influential people in Newfoundland (the tail end of all economies), are pushing for massive wind farms in some of the most breathtakingly beautiful places on Earth. The need to stop. @nlpoli

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

To generate a single gigawatt of electricity a nuclear power plant will occupy just 3.3 square kilometers (330 ha). A solar panel 'farm' needs up to 194 square kilometers (19,400 ha) but wind turbines will need a staggering 932 square kilometers (93,200 ha). They are being built in the most fertile, forested, vulnerable or valuable & prominent rural or coastal land, to gain visible recognition. Turbines & solar panels are disastrous for wildlife, very costly to build & run & need to be rebuilt in 17 to 20 years. They are unreliable & cannot provide the baseline power essential for any modern society.

[Emerald Robinson ✝️ @EmeraldRobinson]

ABC, CNN & NBC will not broadcast President Trump's speech tonight on election fraud.

This is the bright red line.

Now everybody knows: the legacy outlets are controlled by our corrupt intel agencies.

The Trump Admin must cancel their broadcast licenses.

[Roseanne Barr @therealroseanne]

The fact that no news station will air the speech tonight is all the proof you need that there is a conspiracy between the major media corporations and anti-Trump sentiment .

[Bjorn Lomborg @BjornLomborg]

Don’t believe the headlines — climate change isn’t killing your breakfast.

Global food production is rising, real prices are falling, and daily calories per person have jumped from less than 2,200 to more than 2,900 since 1961.

My new op-ed in LA Times: https://t.co/u5Kv2eFYPL

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

President Trump should absolutely give the Presidential Medal of Freedom to the Amish for their amazing work rebuilding Western North Carolina.

They have rebuilt hundreds of bridges, homes, businesses, and roads... and are STILL HERE!!!

No single group deserves it more.

[Justine Bateman @JustineBateman]

- First comedy and satire was targeted. The elements that keep a society largely in check.
- Next was masculinity. Men were shamed as “toxic” for being manly.
- Then it was women who complain, and they were labeled “Karens.”

So if appropriate mockery is out, the most ridiculous concepts actually see the light of day.
If men aren’t permitted to defend what they know they should, the most harmful and dangerous concepts see the light of day.
And when older women are shamed for speak against what they see as wrong, the most outrageous behavior sees the light of day.
Comedy, satire, mockery, masculinity, and female wisdom. Restore it all now.

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

HOW THEY ENGINEERED THE FAKE PANDEMIC

1. China released staged footage of people “dropping dead” in the streets; scenes never witnessed anywhere else in the world before or after December 2019.

2. A PCR test was rolled out that could not determine whether someone was actually sick. The vast majority of results were false positives.

3. The claim of asymptomatic transmission was heavily promoted to justify restrictions on healthy people and to force mass testing on the entire population; which led to tens of millions of false positive test results.

4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and rebrand inconvenient truths as “misinformation.”

5. Behavioral psychologists were brought in to design fear-based messaging specifically intended to secure public compliance.

6. To keep the illusion of a deadly pandemic alive, they required excess mortality data.

7. Ordinary mild respiratory symptoms alone could not produce those numbers, so the population was subjected to sustained psychological pressure capable of triggering mass psychogenic illness.

8. Relentless fear messaging kept cortisol levels chronically elevated, weakening immune function, particularly among the elderly.

9. Social isolation, delayed medical care, and lockdown policies then generated the excess deaths needed to prop up the narrative.

10. Cloth and surgical masks were suddenly declared effective, something no serious public-health authority had previously recommended for ordinary respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking advertisement for fear.

11. People were conditioned to remain isolated “until the vaccine was ready,” buying authorities additional time to expand control.

12. Billions were injected with an experimental product that was claimed to stop both infection and transmission.

13. When those claims collapsed, the goalposts were moved: “Your shot won’t work unless the unvaccinated also take it.”

14. New “variants” were announced every few months to justify an endless series of booster campaigns.

15. A new condition - “long COVID” - was introduced to reframe mounting vaccine side effects.

16. Pharmaceutical companies recorded unprecedented profits, shielded by government contracts and complete legal immunity.

17. Anyone who raised objections was silenced, deplatformed, investigated, or publicly discredited.

18. Once the story became too strained to maintain, the pandemic was abruptly declared over, and the entire episode was treated as if it had never happened.

NEVER FORGET AND PROSECUTE FAUCI!

[Jamil Jivani @jamiljivani]

Wait, the media wants me to apologize for being friends with VP Vance and going to the White House to establish better dialogue between our countries. Hundreds of thousands of jobs depend on the Canada-US relationship. But Carney chooses to fill his office with Democrat operatives, and that's no big deal? Does he actually want a good relationship with our biggest trading partner? Does he care about Canadian jobs?

[Carson Jerema @CarsonJerema]

The most American thing about Canada is the Liberal party

[Bjorn Lomborg @BjornLomborg]

Coffee on the brink of extinction due to climate change? Olive oil in permanent crisis?

Not according to the data.

Record coffee harvests, tripled olive oil production since 1961, and inflation-adjusted food prices trending down.

Don't buy the hype: innovation beats alarmism.

https://t.co/ITLDVm4uto

[Chris Martz @ChrisMartzWX]

Do not listen to anybody—including scientists—who use terms such as “climate crisis” or “climate emergency to describe the current state of environmental affairs.

Wanna guess just how many times those terms appear in the IPCC report?

𝗔 𝗯𝗶𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝘁 𝗭𝗘𝗥𝗢. 👌

[Gary Conway @gazcon]

Let's be clear about what they mean when they say "climate change".

They mean that mankind's carbon emissions, just 0.0012% of the atmosphere, are driving unprecedented and catastrophic change in the climate, and only more taxes and less freedom can stop it.

[Piers Morgan @piersmorgan]

Seeing the despicably cruel, heartless and abusive way that many people in UK and US have responded to the deaths of conservative politicians, Ann Widdecombe and Lindsey Graham, reminds me that the least kind people on earth are ironically those on the #BeKind woke left.

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

I have irrefutable evidence that Candace Owens killed Lindsay Graham.

None of it is evidence or irrefutable but if you're retarded and want to help me make lots of money, subscribe today!

[Yogi @Houseofyogi]

RIP Lindsay Graham

The internet will do what it always does: flatten a complicated human being into a villain, a meme, or a collection of his worst clips.

I understand why people disliked him. I disagreed with him plenty. But the man spent more than three decades in Congress and 33 years serving in the Air Force, Air National Guard, and Air Force Reserve.

He deserves a more honest accounting than “sycophant” or “warmonger.”

Graham was a serious public servant.

He came from a working class family in South Carolina, lost both parents while he was young, helped raise his younger sister, and became the first person in his family to attend college.

He served as a military lawyer, retired as a colonel, spent eight years in the House, and more than two decades in the Senate.

That does not make him correct. It does establish that his life was fundamentally organized around public service.

For much of his career, Graham was also the kind of senator people now claim they want. He was clearly conservative, but willing to work with Democrats.

He helped negotiate the Gang of 14 compromise on judicial nominations. He supported comprehensive immigration reform through the Gang of Eight. He repeatedly worked with Dick Durbin on the DREAM Act. He voted to confirm Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan because he believed a qualified president’s nominees generally deserved confirmation.

He took real political risk to solve problems. That matters.

He was also one of the Senate’s most engaged foreign policy voices. He understood alliances, knew foreign leaders, traveled to war zones, supported NATO, defended Ukraine, and believed America had obligations beyond its own borders.

His final public work involved meeting with President Zelenskyy in Kyiv and advancing bipartisan sanctions against Russia.

You can disagree with his worldview. I often did. But he treated foreign policy as a serious responsibility. Q

His shortcomings were also real.

Graham was too interventionist. His default answer to foreign policy failure was often more force, more troops, more sanctions, or more American involvement. He understood the costs of weakness better than he understood the costs of overreach.

His transformation from fierce Trump critic to loyal Trump ally badly damaged his credibility.

The charitable explanation is that he chose access and influence over irrelevance. The less charitable explanation is that he adapted to wherever Republican power moved.

Both are probably true.

Lindsey Graham was not a saint. He was inconsistent, overly hawkish, and sometimes far too willing to trade institutional credibility for political influence.

But he was not useless, stupid, or evil either.

He served his country for most of his adult life. He knew the Senate. He worked across the aisle. He attempted to solve immigration when both parties preferred weaponizing it.

He defended alliances when isolationism became fashionable. He remained engaged with the world until his final days.

My honest verdict is that Lindsey Graham was a flawed but net positive public servant.

A genuine institutionalist who became less institutional over time.

A knowledgeable foreign policy senator whose appetite for intervention often exceeded his strategic caution.

A conservative partisan who still understood that governing requires negotiation.

Criticize him honestly. He earned plenty of it.

But a country that cannot distinguish between a flawed public servant and a worthless one eventually stops producing public servants at all.

I write this to pay respect. Social media has created too many vile content creators who only see the bad. Want clicks. Let the man rest in peace and be honest about it. Hyperbole is just silly.

[Bjorn Lomborg @BjornLomborg]

Climate sanity, finally

The EU has been gripped by a decade-long climate panic

But it is now finally fading, leaving an opportunity to finally focus on sensible, affordable climate policies

Data: Just published Spring 2026 with 8%, down from 35% in Spring 2019. Eurobarometer nt naming climate/environment as one of two top issues for EU https://t.co/rD0voxNLHn, https://t.co/s2ldooikI8, https://t.co/r6DSVgZw3X. and https://t.co/wtJugJ6A5b

https://t.co/vUTUscxSTQ

[MW4Liberty @MW4Liberty]

We seal envelopes not because the letter contains a conspiracy, but because the contents belong exclusively to the sender and the receiver.

The "nothing to hide" argument is pure corporate/state propaganda. Privacy isn't about hiding a crime; it's about deciding who gets access to your life. It’s a boundary of power, not a shield for guilt.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

I have engaged many liberal voters in my neighbourhood. They are utterly oblivious to any evidence that might require them to alter their positions. The main position that they take: "I'm a good person. I'm liberal. This is why I vote liberal."

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

Charlie Kirk used to ask me to research and write about topics, and he often shared my work.

What I've watched @RealCandaceO do since his murder is even more vile than the leftists who celebrated it.

She has devoted herself to defending the man accused of killing Charlie while relentlessly attacking Charlie's widow, his friends, and the organization he dedicated his life to, all while claiming to be fighting for justice in Charlie's name.

She has inverted the facts, built a wildly profitable media narrative on lies about his murder, and cast herself as the only person who ever truly cared about him, as if his family and loved ones did not.

She has distorted the evidence against Tyler Robinson again and again, spun self-serving fairy tales about Egyptian planes, French Legionnaires, Brigitte Macron, and more, and convinced millions to believe them.

At one point she argued that the U.S. government, Israel, and Brigitte Macron were tied to the murder because an Egyptian aircraft landed at a Delaware hangar used by a French aviation company, an Israeli firm held shares in it, and some unidentified person drove to a government building.

She has not offered a shred of evidence for any of it.

It has been completely insane.

For almost ten months, she has assassinated the character of Charlie's family, friends, and loved ones while pushing narratives that give cover to the man accused of killing him.

Having staked out that position so publicly, it would take enormous humility, integrity, and honesty to admit she was wrong.

I don't believe that will ever happen.

And I expect the attacks to only get worse.

It's one of the most disgusting things I've ever watched.

It's the ultimate betrayal of everything Charlie Kirk stood for—and I'll keep calling it out, for my friend Charlie.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mrs. Owens,

You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."

He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.

You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.

You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.

You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.

You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.

You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.

And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.

Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.

So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.

Every single one failed.

I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.

The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.

I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.

[Melissa Lantsman @MelissaLantsman]

This should dominate the news: Hiking the industrial carbon tax 19% while Ontario auto shrinks is like raising rent on a building the tenants have already vacated.

No EU deal. 5 quarters of falling investment. 40% of manufacturing firms eyeing a move to the US. Ford's plant hasn't shipped a vehicle in 2 years. GM & Stellantis keep cutting.

Slow. Quiet. Inevitable. And preventable. Still no deal. No news. No update.