there’s a common statement i often see getting thrown out in online discourse. it goes something like:
“sayang satu suara orang [kelompok yg gua tidak suka] sama seperti [kelompok yang gua setuju]”
why must you act like that’s a bug not THE literal feature of democracy?
8. Ini chess 3D bukan tanpa resiko. Gub DKI bisa dituduh menguntungkan swasta yg membeli bonds karena tidak memilih bunga ringan dari PT SMI.
9. Tapi ini soal prinsip, dan DKI daerah yg paling bisa berdiri, tidak menunduk ke pusat.
10. Moga2 nanti keluar quote berikut:
Looking back i am so incredibly glad i was forced to study market failures limits to markets.
What you see right here exactly the incoherence of right wing US politics and the “free” market.
Trump: "If we were playing hardball, all we'd do is say we're going to do no trading with Canada. If we did no trading with Canada would save $90 billion."
@Fountaine30 entirely due to a lack of grid infrastructure
if anything coal is a much less interruptible energy source compared to most renewables with the exception of probably geothermal energy
by your logic indo should have ranked first
Gini doang aku nangis 🥺🥺selemah itukah hati dan air mataku ya tuhan 😭
Kemunculan Sang Proklamator Bapak Presiden Pertama Republik Indonesia ( Ir Sukarno).
The recent battle between The Economist and Daron Acemoglu made me revisit one of the most important challenges to his institutional framework: China.
In Why Nations Fail (2012), Acemoglu and Robinson argue that China remained politically extractive, while economic
Daron Acemoglu blasts The Economist over their bizarre critique of him: “Your central verdict that I am 'oddly unconvincing' rests on unnamed economists revealing their true opinion of me over a few drinks. No persons who have been offered drinks to get to this truth are named. Would you publish a letter asserting that, over a few drinks, most people tell me that your newspaper is no longer worth subscribing to? The only person quoted with such views is a blogger, Noah Smith, a thin basis for judging a lifetime of academic work [...] If this is the best you can do with a body of work spanning 33 years, then it is your critique that is 'oddly unconvincing.'”