@neetcode1 still looking for the flow that is best for me, but mostly cycling with the terminal stuff
probably a dashboarding solution would be good to manage all these clis, some might exist already but i havent researched
@OpenAI your new model is cool, so cool that i would like to buy more credits but i see 400 call on openai backend when im trying to do it from codex dashboard - seems to happen pretty consistently with every browser
@dhh This is the way! Provider-agnostic tools is the way. Isn’t that basically why tools like VS Code, neovim etc. are so popular, because you can use them for almost everything and if you change languages - you can stick to your workflow mostly?
@thsottiaux I would be really happy if you'd experiment with some tiers in between Plus and Pro subscription - jump from 20 to 200 dollars is a bit much for part-time hobbyist like me.
@itsPaulAi What about the privacy and processed data? With ChatGPT they at least provide controls to opt out from the model training, but can you do that with Bing? (Genuine question, don't know this.)
@OpenAI
Hello!
I am a ChatGPT Plus Subcriber, and I am currently unable to get a login link, when ChatGPT is at capacity.
Could you take a look at this?
Thanks in advance!
@thorstenball prerequisites, what the math, they're trying to learn, is built on top of. And the reason for that is that they haven't put the hours in the prerequisites. Not that they are "stupid", or can't learn math.
I think this applies to tech aswell.
@thorstenball I can't agree more. A lot in tech people, and in the University world, I've seen people come across these "brick walls", when they feel like they "can't" learn something (say, for example, math), what really is the case, they've not done math enough - they lack the prerequisites