To qualify as Science a piece of research must be correct and reproducible.
To be correct and reproducible, it must be described in sufficient details in a publication.
To be 'published' (to receive a seal of approval) the publication must be checked for correctness by reviewers.
To be reproduced, the publication must be widely available to the community and sufficiently interesting.
If you do research and don't publish, it's not Science.
Without peer review and reproducibility, chances are your methodology was flawed and you fooled yourself into thinking you did something great.
No one will ever hear about your work.
No one will pick it up and build on top of it.
No one will build new technology and products with it.
Your work will have been in vain.
You'll die bitter and forgotten.
If you never published your research but somehow developed it into a product, you might die rich.
But you'll still be a bit bitter and largely forgotten.
AI today is moving too fast. I was never been worried about AI and I have 30 year experience in the domain. But now I start to be worried specifically about the rate of change and how, as a society we will adapt. We are a the eve of big employment disruption.
#AI,#Future OfWork
@qertscience I wonder how much of this story is true. I mean everybody working to make nuclear fusilb working. No one have yet proven that fusion is working efficiently. And what this post is saying that we have built flying saucers in 57????
@BasicFitBE Merci pour la réactivité. Beaucoup d’entre nous utilisent les cours virtuels comme une manière d’avoir un entraînement complet en un seul cours. C’était pratique quand on travail et on a pas le temps. Je suppose que je doit aussi m’adapter.
@BasicFitBE@BasicFitBE vraiment mécontent sur la nouvelle formule des cours virtuels. Beaucoup moins challengeant qu’avant. Ils sont plus court donc on perd plus de temps car il faut maintenant plusieurs cours différent pour être complet.