@samar11 SC under Surya Kant will still uphold it. After all we are the only country in the world where the court thinks it's ok to virtually strip you of citizenship rights because there's a spelling error when your name in 20 yr old records was translated from vernacular to English
@AshutoshRanka the only country in the world where the court thinks it's ok to virtually strip you of citizenship rights (even passport renewals, NEET seat as in Bengal) because 20 yr old records, when translated manually to English, had a spelling error
@barandbench We are now the only country in the world where the court thinks it's ok to virtually strip you of citizenship rights (even passport renewals, NEET seat as in Bengal) because - among others -20 yr old records, when translated manually to English, had a spelling error
The higher judiciary is a waste of time, as we have seen throughout SIR. As in NRC, it not only facilitated the process, it even took part it in. Political parties may feel compelled to approach the courts for institutional reasons, CJP should have no such compulsions
@darab_farooqui Right now we are the only country in the world where the court thinks it's ok to virtually strip you of citizenship rights (even passport renewals, NEET seat as in Bengal) because - among others -20 yr old records, when translated manually to English, had a spelling error
@SauravDassss Also not only can they not vote "next time" (appeals will take at least 20 years ), they have virtually lost citizenship rights, including passport verification, ration card, even NEET seats just because there was a spelling error coz 20 yr old records were translated to English
@DilliDurAst The system checks your current age with your father's age with 2002. A friend of mine realised it when he got the notice (in his case he had mapped to his grandfather). The genius who designed the software should be given bharat ratna
What happens to 22 lakh voters in Bengal fighting for restoration in the tribunal? What about the 16.1 lakh appeals filed for exclusion by the ECI? How can the ECI's sin be forgotten?
@ainvvy Many have got these notices it's tragicomic. A fruend of mine mapped to his grandfather & recieved a similar notice though ages were correct. It turns out the system actually compared his current age to his grandparents age in 2002. They couldn't even get basic calculation right
The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls is being litigated as a question of the Election Commission’s powers. But behind the notices sent to millions of electors is another question that has received far less scrutiny, what software is deciding who gets flagged, on what data, and according to which rules? (1/10)
Read our full analysis: https://t.co/rvvpP20PlY
@dhruv_rathee The CJI himself provided cover for this criminal illegality. Wonder why no one's is talking about him. Gyanesh couldn't have done what he did but for the CJI nd Justice Bagchi
Gyanesh Kumar is a low-hanging fruit. Of course he enabled the biggest fraud ever on Indian citizens, but was he the only one? Didn't Supreme Court enable this? Didn't the opposition play along rather than boycott an obviously fraudulent electoral process?
https://t.co/UVAZkJ8rSQ
Next, the Supreme Court, which the opposition, again for some strange reason thought would right SIR's wrongs. Strange, given the court's track record of timid complicity. It was already clear by July last year that the court was toeing the govt's line
https://t.co/U0xACIwmdY