@harismrkonjan1 kojih 7-8? budimo realni, Denis je vec bio tu ranije i zbog toga se moglo pitat nesto u vezi njegovih zadnjih izjava i da prokomentarisu postoji li sansa da se vrati ako pocne igrati redovnije za Bragu? Licina krilo talenat pozicija na kojoj nam treba igraca uvijek. navedi ostale
Viktor Gyökeres had his heart set on leaving Arsenal by the end of the summer transfer window.
Importantly, the summer didn’t start that way.
An accumulation of things changed the situation.
Arsenal made it clear they were targeting Julián Alvarez, alongside other attacking options, and Gyökeres began to realise that his grip on a starting position was loosening.
That was compounded by Kai Havertz being given as many minutes as possible whenever fit.
As the summer progressed, Gyökeres’ representatives were in contact regarding a potential move away. There was an understanding that Arsenal were looking at other forwards and, if the right opportunity presented itself, Gyökeres could leave.
Ultimately, for a variety of reasons, that move never materialised.
But the situation had consequences.
The conduct of the player and his representatives during that period left Mikel Arteta unimpressed, to say the least.
That is the context behind Gyökeres not playing a single minute in Arsenal’s opening two Premier League fixtures.
Once the transfer window closed, conversations took place between Arteta, Gyökeres and the player’s representatives.
A clearing of the air.
The message was effectively: you’re here now, we’re here now, and while you’re an Arsenal player you’re part of this squad. We need to come together and move forward.
By all accounts, Gyökeres responded well. His training and general conduct improved and he was brought back into the fold.
What we’re seeing now may be the consequence of everything that came before it.
A player who spent much of the summer unsure where his future lay. A disrupted pre-season. A lack of match sharpness. And now, increasingly, a lack of confidence.
Whatever the circumstances that got Arsenal and Gyökeres to this point, something has to give.
Gyökeres has to take responsibility for his own situation and performances.
Arsenal also have to find a way of getting him firing again.
Because right now, it’s clear we’re watching a player performing well below the level we know he’s capable of.
We know the technical limitations of the player, but the application of the player is that of a disengaged player.
The responsibility lies somewhere in the middle. The club need to support him, and the player needs to take some responsibility and fight.
You’ll never see Gary Neville or Jamie Carragher demand for such transparency and accountability from the officials on live tv. What you’ll see them do is call out managers for questioning match officials. Thank you Jay Bothroyd for being an honest man.
RIP Bothroyds career.
But he’s gone down fighting with integrity!!!! Well done @jaybothroyd 👏🏼 millions of fans around the world, in fact probably billions. Actually salute you. A man who wants the game cleaned up saying this on the corrupt channel @SkySportsNews is class 👏🏼
“Oops sorry we literally just decided a game by giving an offside goal that was given offside on-field and was very obviously offside. Sorry we gifted City 3 points. Oopsie”
Referee gave a penalty on Ballard which shouldn’t have been one in the first place, told Gabriel to leave the pitch when he was elbowed, didn’t give a corner at the end of the first half and now books Gabriel for stopping a fight.
PGMOL will love this performance from the ref
Srebrenitsa’da sivil müslümanları öldürmek için Sırplara para ödeyip “insan safarisi” düzenleyen batılılar, bugün “islam öldürür” diyor. Fıkra bu kadar.
Leaked email number 3. CAS Man City case
£95m required.
£15m “via Etisalat”
£5m “via Etihad”
£1m via Aabar
£1m via ADTA
£44.1m directly via ADUG as equity
🤣🤣🤣
Former referee @HACKETTREF analyses eight decisions that have gone Van Dijk's way:
❌ Van Dijk v Muniz
❌ Van Dijk v Onana
❌ Van Dijk v Trusty
❌ Van Dijk v Havertz
❌ Van Dijk v Gordon
❌ Van Dijk v Solanke
❌ Van Dijk v Richarlison
#LFC | #TelegraphFootball
The UK government was asked to release correspondence about Man City’s charges and refused to disclose parts of it under Section 27 of the Freedom of Information Act — because publication could “prejudice relations” between the UK and UAE. Just a normal football case, obviously.
Man City’s midfield trio tonight cost them roughly £235 million over the past 14 months. They’ve also got new £116 million and £65 million signings on the bench.
Good to see those 115 alleged charges for breaching Financial Fair Play rules have really acted as a deterrent.
😤 “Man City have got away with bloody murder!”
💰 “They must have paid half a billion in lawyers fees to frighten the Premier League!”
Alan Sugar gives a SCATHING attack on the delay of Man City’s 115 charges ‘punishment’.
📺https://t.co/sY50goUrwm
@Lord_Sugar | @sjopinion10