sandwich

full of soup(rage)

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@bagrovayamaska @BertaBound13 @Nora_TheGreat1 @ZELLKLUMPEN Bodily autonomy means the woman can abort an unwanted pregnancy. No person is permitted to be inside her against her will, since no one has that right.

If the only way you can live is at someone else's physical expense, and they don't want that, you die. Tough luck.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@luvmyjaide @Justjanny58 @MibshaD You're a forced birther LARP account. Be honest. Are you even a woman at all? Is this a jerk-off fantasy of yours?

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@luvmyjaide @MibshaD You can't oppress someone by removing them from your sex organs. What kind of tortured non-logic is this?

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@MinnieStarfall4 @it_canbeblanc @KatelynTweeter Can't handle the obvious results of the laws you want to see implemented, huh?

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@NigelXYYMan @KingBobIIV @KatelynTweeter Why would it be permissible to violate a woman's bodily autonomy just because she had sex? Keep your opinions to yourself you hideous bald abomination.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KingBobIIV @KatelynTweeter Bad choices to...inseminate themselves? With their own dick & balls? Where do they go after, I wonder.

The amount of male accountability denial going on here is crazy. You're acting as if men are literally *nonexistent*.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KatelynTweeter Then advocate for mandatory vasectomies, since that's the only thing that will actually ever "end abortion".

Of course, anti-choice women are more interested in promoting male dominance than preventing abortion, so this won't fly.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @StevenSzedlak @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Which a fetus is, since it can only survive by taking resources from a host, at that host's expense, the same way a parasite does. This behavior is rightly called "parasitic".

Reality does not change based on your feelings. If you dislike reality, it's still reality.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @StevenSzedlak @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN No, but it being right makes it right.

If you get a tard-trummed out by me explaining how 2+2=4, that's your problem, not mine.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @StevenSzedlak @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Fetuses objectively behave parasitically, in that they take resources from a host to survive, at the great expense of that host. You thinking this isn't poetic enough for your liking doesn't change reality.

Again, trying to ape my verbiage without understanding. So, so dim.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @StevenSzedlak @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN You quite clearly are.

Now, try to make a point. I don't care how meanie-meanie you think I'm being.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@JadeAtrophis What about what I wrote is hard to understand?

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @StevenSzedlak @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Oh, diddums. This has got to be your most pathetic attempt at a clapback yet. You're simply not smart enough to pull this off, you know?

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@PreciousWizard @JadeAtrophis No, they aren't. Check out the breakdown of anti-choice ideology when it comes to gender; most women are pro-choice, men are pretty 50/50. Anti-choice orgs made and run by men having female talking heads doesn't change that fact.

Pro-choice gives everyone control of themselves.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Paternal genome dominance in the placenta is well-documented. Paternal dominance in someone's genome in general is documented since paternal genes are less likely to be methylated & thus more likely to be expressed.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Yes, it's exactly what I said. Derived by the paternal genome = paternal genome being dominant, as dominant genes are the ones that determine expression/function.

Paternal genome wants to take resources, maternal genome wants to keep her resources. This *is* the balance.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Which has not happened. I've been exhaustively explaining my use of terms to you. Deflecting like this won't work; you're not smart enough to pull it off.

Now, try to make a point.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Which does not change the fact that gametes are haploid, not diploid, and thus not "our" DNA. This is why our bodies would attack them, had we also not evolved ways to keep our immune system from doing so.

Is 46, XX identical to 23, X? Try thinking about this, for once.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @StevenSzedlak @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Yes, you can. Someone who is being duplicitous(wrt someone's ability to consent), too pushy, or hostile can easily be described as acting like a rapist, even if they haven't done the act yet. The nature being described is that of violating consent, or seeming to want to.

[sandwich @hamnchees_]

@KjellynP @DedeHutX @PurpleLight1X @Maaahaaah25434 @ZELLKLUMPEN Enough tard-trums on your part. I don't care if you think I'm a meanie-meanie-mean-pants.

Now, try to make a point.