@dutweets your visual IVR doesn't work and there is no way to speak to someone. I want to cancel my account but you make it impossible. How can I talk to someone?
We just had the most appalling trip with @GetTransfercom. The van was different to the one promised, the AC didn’t work properly, it had no seatbelts and the driver was sick and was driving dangerously. Absolutely appalling experience.
@DubaiProperties why do you make it impossible for owners to get a response or support with an NOC? The call centre can not do anything and responses never come even when promised?
@NZMurph69 @Lesleycubawelly @Chris_Luxon@NicolaWillisMP@NZNationalParty They recognise that there’s a voter base that hate mandates. It’s insignificant compared to the voter base that supports mandates so will continue to be ignored.
@Hititonthefull1@HuwTindall@CudmoreJock There’s no possible argument with the refereeing. They followed the guidelines. Any argument is with the law and the interpretation guidelines.
@Hititonthefull1@HuwTindall@CudmoreJock Wayne Barnes explains it very simply here. The head contact framework is very easy to understand and does not exclude head on head contact. https://t.co/mESRsE87yZ
@calgas21@bigmac_ak@LynaghMichael The law application guidelines say nothing of the sort. They say:
Mitigation will not apply for intentional or highly reckless acts of foul play. https://t.co/DhEoB1cBG7
@calgas21@bigmac_ak@LynaghMichael This is no longer the case. The new framework, that was introduced in March, does allow for mitigation for no arms tackles.