Top Tweets for #CAFPLLC
#KeepAgricultureStrong
#NoSolarOnFarmland
#ProtectFarmland
#farmsecurityisnationalsecurity
#CAFPLLC
If you can donate, please do. This fight started a while ago and legal fees continue to accumulate. Check out Ohio Supreme Court case 2025-0075.
https://t.co/e2dpdFzwGF
Why do I dislike solar so much?
Because solar farms are a giant waste of land and natural resources.
Let’s do some math.
A single 1,000-megawatt (MWe) nuclear reactor occupies ~1 mi² (640 acres) of land. Nuclear also has a capacity factor of 0.923, meaning a reactor will generate ~92.3% of the maximum theoretical amount of electrical energy in a year that it could have.
🔗 https://t.co/RBm0KC9buK
Thus, a 1,000-MWe reactor will produce ~8.08 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year, enough to power over 770,000 homes throughout the course of a year (assuming Americans purchase an average of 10.5 MWh per household per year).
🏠💡 = [1,000 MW × (24 hours / day) × (365 days / year) × 0.923] / 10.5 MWh ≈ 770,046 homes
On the contrary, a solar photovoltaic (PV) farm requires 5-10 acres per MW (we’ll assume an average of 7.5) Solar PV has a capacity factor of 0.234.
Thus, a 1,000-MWe solar farm occupies ~7,500 acres of land, but it would only power ~195,223 homes assuming, once again, Americans purchase 10.5 MWh of electricity per year, on average.
🏠 💡 = [1,000 MW × (24 hours / day) × (365 days / year) × 0.234] / 10.5 MWh ≈ 195,223 homes
So, you’d need ~4,000 MWe of installed solar capacity to power the same number of homes as a single 1,000 MWe nuclear power station, and ~46.2× the land area, not including the land required for enough battery storage.
But, it gets even worse if you factor the battery storage required.
Solar PV’s average output is 234 MW.
☀️ = 1,000 MW × 0.234 = 234 MW per hour OR 5,616 MWh per day OR 39,312 MWh per week
For a week’s worth of battery backup, it would require an additional 23,587.2 acres of land (assuming battery storage requires 0.6 acres / MWh, which is the typical amount).
Rooftop solar is fine. ✅
Installing it on the roofs of homes, stores, warehouses, etc. can be useful.
But, doing this is not. 👇
![ChrisMartzWX's tweet photo. Why do I dislike solar so much?
Because solar farms are a giant waste of land and natural resources.
Let’s do some math.
A single 1,000-megawatt (MWe) nuclear reactor occupies ~1 mi² (640 acres) of land. Nuclear also has a capacity factor of 0.923, meaning a reactor will generate ~92.3% of the maximum theoretical amount of electrical energy in a year that it could have.
🔗 https://t.co/RBm0KC9buK
Thus, a 1,000-MWe reactor will produce ~8.08 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year, enough to power over 770,000 homes throughout the course of a year (assuming Americans purchase an average of 10.5 MWh per household per year).
🏠💡 = [1,000 MW × (24 hours / day) × (365 days / year) × 0.923] / 10.5 MWh ≈ 770,046 homes
On the contrary, a solar photovoltaic (PV) farm requires 5-10 acres per MW (we’ll assume an average of 7.5) Solar PV has a capacity factor of 0.234.
Thus, a 1,000-MWe solar farm occupies ~7,500 acres of land, but it would only power ~195,223 homes assuming, once again, Americans purchase 10.5 MWh of electricity per year, on average.
🏠 💡 = [1,000 MW × (24 hours / day) × (365 days / year) × 0.234] / 10.5 MWh ≈ 195,223 homes
So, you’d need ~4,000 MWe of installed solar capacity to power the same number of homes as a single 1,000 MWe nuclear power station, and ~46.2× the land area, not including the land required for enough battery storage.
But, it gets even worse if you factor the battery storage required.
Solar PV’s average output is 234 MW.
☀️ = 1,000 MW × 0.234 = 234 MW per hour OR 5,616 MWh per day OR 39,312 MWh per week
For a week’s worth of battery backup, it would require an additional 23,587.2 acres of land (assuming battery storage requires 0.6 acres / MWh, which is the typical amount).
Rooftop solar is fine. ✅
Installing it on the roofs of homes, stores, warehouses, etc. can be useful.
But, doing this is not. 👇](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gz8SBDtXQAAGL8P.jpg)
#CAFPLLC has an appeal with the Ohio Supreme Court, case 2025-0075. OPSB approved a Logan County project where there was bias.
#KeepAgricultureStrong
#NoSolarOnFarmland
#ProtectFarmland
#farmsecurityisnationalsecurity
#CAFPLLC
https://t.co/e2dpdFzwGF
The Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) has given the thumbs up to a 120-MW solar project being developed by a unit of Open Road Renewables in the state’s Knox County. https://t.co/AkWLlVkdsw

https://t.co/rgeaGAqmgV
Please review and comment!
#KeepAgricultureStrong
#NoSolarOnFarmland
#ProtectFarmland
#farmsecurityisnationalsecurity
#CAFPLLC
https://t.co/USU203D0t9
Please donate. The battle is not over.
https://t.co/e2dpdFzwGF
#KeepAgricultureStrong
#NoSolarOnFarmland
#ProtectFarmland
#farmsecurityisnationalsecurity
#CAFPLLC
If you can donate, please do. This fight started a while ago and legal fees continue to accumulate. Check out Ohio Supreme Court case 2025-0075.
https://t.co/e2dpdFzwGF
China isn’t interested in competing with us. China is interested in defeating us.
Americans can't just let Communist China’s technology walk in and be infused into our lives through our phones and devices.
#KeepAgricultureStrong
#NoSolarOnFarmland
#ProtectFarmland
#farmsecurityisnationalsecurity
#CAFPLLC
If you can donate, please do. This fight started a while ago and legal fees continue to accumulate. Check out Ohio Supreme Court case 2025-0075.
https://t.co/e2dpdFzwGF
@ChrisMartzWX Agree! There is information available from a history of trying Solar and Wind. Suggest to take a second look when Government provides tax payer monies towards something. #CAFPLLC has been fighting in Ohio and needs help with support!
Thank you for your support!
#CAFPLLC continues the appeal process in the Ohio Supreme Court case 2025-0075. Farmland can still go to Solar in Ohio without support for legal fees! Please consider donating!
https://t.co/e2dpdFA4wd
#nosolarinlogancounty
#nosolaronfarmland
On Monday in rural Tennessee, I unveiled the next step in protecting our family farms & our way of life: ending taxpayer subsidization of foreign solar panels on prime farmland.
Read my latest @newsweek op-ed below!👇 https://t.co/xeEjoWur6o
Most Popular Users

Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.2M followers

Barack Obama 
@barackobama
119.1M followers

Cristiano Ronaldo 
@cristiano
113M followers

Donald J. Trump 
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers

Narendra Modi 
@narendramodi
107.1M followers

Rihanna 
@rihanna
98.3M followers

NASA 
@nasa
92.3M followers

Justin Bieber 
@justinbieber
91.5M followers

KATY PERRY 
@katyperry
89.1M followers

Taylor Swift 
@taylorswift13
83M followers

Lady Gaga 
@ladygaga
74.5M followers

Virat Kohli 
@imvkohli
72M followers

Kim Kardashian 
@kimkardashian
70.5M followers

YouTube 
@youtube
68.8M followers

Neymar Jr 
@neymarjr
64.9M followers

Bill Gates 
@billgates
64.6M followers

The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers

Selena Gomez 
@selenagomez
62.1M followers

CNN 
@cnn
61.8M followers

X 
@x
60.8M followers




