Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC

Citizens Against Fountain Point, LLC (CAFP, LLC) was created to advocate for the responsible placement of industrial solar and without use of gov't subsidies.

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

Net zero in a nutshell.

We are paying our taxes to governments to pay corporations.

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

Here is a replay of the court case. Please let me know your thoughts.

https://t.co/jHzt97szwX

We appreciate the support to help with Legal fees:

https://t.co/qgS1od8B8Z

[No Farmers, No Food @NoFarmsNoFoods]

This is not “saving the planet”.
This is vandalism of the countryside.

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

Please support our appeal with the Ohio Supreme Court Case 2025-0075.

Ohio Power Siting Board approved more Solar Panels.

https://t.co/e2dpdFzwGF

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

Putting solar panels on prime farmland is a disgraceful oversight.

[John Lee Pettimore @JohnLeePettim13]

How the Wind Turbine scam works:
Warren Buffett’s energy division has reported a negative income tax rate for five straight years, thanks to billions of dollars’ worth of tax credits it’s received for producing wind power.
For 2019 through 2022, the analysis showed Berkshire Hathaway Energy had severely turned the tables on the IRS, harvesting $6.1 billion in tax payments from the federal government. And for the first quarter of 2023 when BHE reported a negative 163 percent tax rate, meaning the firm literally collected more harvesting tax payments from federal taxpayers ($363 million) than it made in profits for providing electricity ($223 million).
It's no wonder Trump is shutting down the wind industry.

[John Lee Pettimore @JohnLeePettim13]

Mining 1 ton of rare earth minerals produces about 1 ton of radioactive waste, according to the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security. In 2012, the U.S. added a record 13,131 MW of wind generating capacity. That means that between 4.9 million pounds (using MIT’s estimate) and 6.1 million pounds (using the Bulletin of Atomic Science’s estimate) of rare earths were used in wind turbines installed in 2012. It also means that between 4.9 million and 6.1 million pounds of radioactive waste were created to make these wind turbines — more than America’s nuclear industry, which produces between 4.4 million and 5 million pounds of spent nuclear fuel each year. Shut down the wind industry and built nuclear. It's better for the planet.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

It’s safe to say that after this weeks bombshell revelations around Geo-Engineering coming out of America we can finally say to the masses.

Conspiracy Confirmed ✅

[Steve Milloy @JunkScience]

President Trump removes climate nonsense from national parks:

"At least seven pages related to climate change on the Park Service website were no longer accessible as of Wednesday, though internet archives indicate the administration may have taken down some of the pages months ago. Those include pages on how the Park Service monitors climate change as well as information on how global warming relates to individual parks.

"The text on one page began with the statement, “Human activities are changing the Earth’s climate.” Another discussed climate change’s impact along the Louisiana coast at Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve. A page about the Lowell National Historical Park in Massachusetts included information about the site’s importance in the Industrial Revolution, noting that it kicked off changes to the global climate and that “burning of fossil fuels has been especially detrimental.”

"“Thanks to President Donald Trump, Interior is ensuring that the American people are no longer being fed the lies of the delusional Green New Scam,” Aubrie Spady, deputy press secretary at the Interior Department, said in a statement.

"“The content was taken down at the beginning of the year because this administration believes in only administering facts based on real science to the American public, not brainless fearmongering rhetoric used to steal taxpayer dollars,” she added, in reference to the webpages."

https://t.co/cka2xqXl6I

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

Ed Miliband promised lower energy bills. Instead, his mad net zero zealotry will fuel a £100 rise in household energy bills from next April. It’s time to axe net zero. A monumental act of stupidity that is costing a fortune at a time when people just can’t afford it.

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Pouring up to $35 billion into the net zero derangement syndrome is delusional beyond comprehension. Net zero means a dead end for Australia. It's a scam. The entire urban area of cities & towns covers only 0.25% of the landmass (globally, humans occupy 3%). Australia produces 'only' 0.09% of the world's CO₂ from human activity, yet its the world's greatest carbon sink: forests cover 17% of the landmass (absorbing CO₂ through photosynthesis) & deserts occupy 18%. Its beachfront & mangrove coastline stretches for 60,000 km - longer than the United States coastline. This vast carbon reservoir has hardly any human habitation & will soon have no money. It will go broke.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🚨 “Turns out all the crazy cranks & conspiracy theorists who were concerned about Weather Modification & Chemtrails were right after all”

“Here we are in Capital Hill”.

It’s taken a few years - but every person who knew those lines in the sky weren’t natural, haven’t always been there & that Climate Engineering on a Global Scale was happening have now been proven correct.

You were right, you were always right, you always knew you were right & finally we’re all being vindicated, as the subject is now being discussed throughout Washington.

@benleo reports.

[John Lee Pettimore @JohnLeePettim13]

It would take 3.7 trillion pounds of materials to generate half of U.S. electricity with 1,095,000 2 MW wind turbines. Each turbine requires 1,671 tons of material: 1,300 tons concrete, 295 tons steel, 48 tons iron, 24 tons fiberglass, 4 tons copper, 0.4 tons neodymium, and 0.065 tons dysprosium, replaced every 15-20 years. Mining and ore processing, is the second most polluting industry in the world, releasing acid rain and heavy metals into land, water, and air. Extracting and processing dispersed minerals consumes significant fossil fuel energy. Billions more tons of materials are needed for transmission, power plants, and utility-scale batteries, also replaced every 15-20 years. The green energy dream remains just that—a dream.

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Controlled demolition of wing turbines after 25 years. At millions of dollars per turbine, it means they will have to be knocked down & rebuilt over & over & can never produce cheap, reliable or baseload energy. In other words they are useless.
https://t.co/L7bZZkyN5N

[David Turver @7Kiwi]

Coming Sunday. Gone with the Wind: Offshore wind operators issuing profit warnings because it hasn't been windy enough.

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

#KeepAgricultureStrong
#NoSolarOnFarmland
#ProtectFarmland
#farmsecurityisnationalsecurity
#CAFPLLC

If you can donate, please do. This fight started a while ago and legal fees continue to accumulate. Check out Ohio Supreme Court case 2025-0075.

https://t.co/e2dpdFzwGF

[Chris Martz @ChrisMartzWX]

Why do I dislike solar so much?

Because solar farms are a giant waste of land and natural resources.

Let’s do some math.

A single 1,000-megawatt (MWe) nuclear reactor occupies ~1 mi² (640 acres) of land. Nuclear also has a capacity factor of 0.923, meaning a reactor will generate ~92.3% of the maximum theoretical amount of electrical energy in a year that it could have.

🔗 https://t.co/RBm0KC9buK

Thus, a 1,000-MWe reactor will produce ~8.08 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year, enough to power over 770,000 homes throughout the course of a year (assuming Americans purchase an average of 10.5 MWh per household per year).

🏠💡 = [1,000 MW × (24 hours / day) × (365 days / year) × 0.923] / 10.5 MWh ≈ 770,046 homes

On the contrary, a solar photovoltaic (PV) farm requires 5-10 acres per MW (we’ll assume an average of 7.5) Solar PV has a capacity factor of 0.234.

Thus, a 1,000-MWe solar farm occupies ~7,500 acres of land, but it would only power ~195,223 homes assuming, once again, Americans purchase 10.5 MWh of electricity per year, on average.

🏠 💡 = [1,000 MW × (24 hours / day) × (365 days / year) × 0.234] / 10.5 MWh ≈ 195,223 homes

So, you’d need ~4,000 MWe of installed solar capacity to power the same number of homes as a single 1,000 MWe nuclear power station, and ~46.2× the land area, not including the land required for enough battery storage.

But, it gets even worse if you factor the battery storage required.

Solar PV’s average output is 234 MW.

☀️ = 1,000 MW × 0.234 = 234 MW per hour OR 5,616 MWh per day OR 39,312 MWh per week

For a week’s worth of battery backup, it would require an additional 23,587.2 acres of land (assuming battery storage requires 0.6 acres / MWh, which is the typical amount).

Rooftop solar is fine. ✅

Installing it on the roofs of homes, stores, warehouses, etc. can be useful.

But, doing this is not. 👇

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

The answer is rather simple if our goal is to protect the habitat. Nukes and fossil fuels.

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

Check out this quick video from @prageru

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

Can We Rely on Wind and Solar Energy? | 5 Minute Video https://t.co/SJNrtXS6rK via @YouTube

It is interesting where Germany subsidizes their green energy as well. Why are so many tax dollars needed to fund these projects only for larger corporations to reap the energy credits?

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

Solar has its place but it is heavily subsidized to make it look financially attractive with a short life span. What about clean up costs? It’s your tax dollars funding this.

Considering donating to keep farmland from the CCP.

https://t.co/e2dpdFA4wd

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

Please help with the current appeal in the Ohio Supreme Court Case 2025-0075.

#CAFPLLC
#noindustrialsolar
#corporatewelfare
#farmsfirst

[Citizens Against Fountain Point LLC @CAFPLLC]

What is happening in Ohio with Industrial Solar?
https://t.co/5nZWT1oIA3

Please check our story:
https://t.co/yGjGZPJXeH