Top Tweets for #Disarming

Reports and video show 6–9 ICE agents forcing a man to the ground, striking him repeatedly in the head, and then firing into him after he had stopped moving. Even accepting claims that the man was armed, the sequence and tactics raise grave questions about training, discipline, and accountability. First, virtually every modern law-enforcement use-of-force policy prohibits punching a person in the head, especially once they are grounded or restrained. Head strikes carry a high risk of death or permanent brain injury and are explicitly limited to extreme, last-resort scenarios—not crowd-on-one takedowns. Second, firing downward into pavement at close range is recklessly dangerous. Bullets striking concrete or asphalt can fragment or ricochet unpredictably, sending shrapnel or deflected rounds laterally at high speed. This isn’t hypothetical—it’s a well-known ballistic risk taught in firearms training. Those rounds don’t just endanger the suspect; they endanger fellow officers and civilians nearby. Law enforcement is trained to account for backstops and bystanders. Shooting into the ground in a public space abandons that responsibility entirely. Third, if federal agents can lawfully kill someone for the mere possession of a firearm—without it being fired, aimed, or used—then the right to keep and bear arms is meaningless in practice. A right that evaporates the moment the state decides you’re inconvenient is not a right; it’s a permission slip. If “he had a gun” is sufficient justification after the threat has ended, then constitutional protections exist only at the discretion of armed agents. If you still refuse to see this kind of conduct as state violence carried out with impunity, you’re either naïve or willfully blind. We hope you regain your sense of proportionality—and your humanity—before more innocent people, bystanders included, pay the price.