Top Tweets for #F16sForUkraineNOW

1 - If Ukraine wasn't disarmed in 1994 - war wouldn't happen. 2 - If Ukraine had F-16 - kids wouldn't die today. "But it's complicated" - well, FUCK YOU, mister Complicated. The war didn't start yesterday! Mig-29 has 2 engines and is not even remotely as easy to maintain as F-16. Mig has 2 engines. F-16 has one. The list can be replaced in hours. To refuel the F-16 in Ukraine - we should only replace the power supply and fuel hose. Maybe pumps. Correct me if I'm wrong. Getting the engine along with disarming the jet takes 1h. Then, putting the engine back in place (the same or another one) - could take another 1-2 hours. Not even talking about flying - it's MUCH easier to handle that Mig-29 or Suka Sukhoi 27. In terms of range, F-16 AN/APG-68 radar can see as far as 290 km (180 miles), which means that it can take down Suka Su-27 w/o even showing up on the radar (as most Soviet crap has radars ~80–100 km (50–62 mi). I understand that you want to make it cheaper, supplying Ukraine with Mig's and Su, so the donor countries would have to buy F35 in the future to replenish airforces. I understand that you want to obliterate the russian army, not just slap them so they retreat. I understand that you hope that "Ukrainians will deal with hit with what they have," But ffs, it costs lives! 350k+ russian terrorists are currently in Ukraine. We need a normal-sized stick! People are dying!