Top Tweets for #MediaFUD
From Wall Street to Washington: The Truth About Musk’s $45M Trump Bet
#mediaFUD
A recent report from The Wall Street Journal suggested that Elon Musk plans to pledge $45 million per month to America PAC, supporting Donald Trump's presidential bid. Fortune sees this as a surprising risk, given Trump's dislike of EVs.
However, these media claims are not true.
1. Musk has denied this claim.
2. Even if it were true, it wouldn't be a risk. The dynamics behind Biden’s EV incentive program are complex and actually harm Tesla’s lower-priced Model 3 RWD, which uses Chinese LFP batteries. Musk has consistently stated that he doesn't need EV incentives.

#MediaFUD
Media outlets such as Reuters are spreading negativity about Tesla more than other car companies.
But this intense focus is missing when we look at competitors with similar struggles.
Hyundai has just delayed their self-driving taxi program for the 3rd time, pushing the target launch date from 2021 to 2026.
CONTROVERSIAL
Exclusive: In Tesla Autopilot probe, US prosecutors focus on securities, wire fraud
https://t.co/hWIsvmAj0q
TRUE
Hyundai’s JV Motional delays robotaxi commercialization, cuts jobs
https://t.co/EbfAxOjwLP

#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
로이터의 4월5일자 "테슬라 모델2 취소" 오보 기사로 겪은 손실은 다음과 같습니다.
- 주가 3.6% 폭락
- 테슬라 시가총액 180억 달러 (한화 24조원) 증발
(참고: 에코프로비엠 22조원)
그런데 이번 사태가 다른 경우와 달리 흥미로운 점은
1. CEO가 30분 만에 사실 무근이라고 했지만 무시
2. 어닝콜에서 구체적 계획도 발표했지만 정정 없음
3. 연합뉴스가 새벽(3:24)에 거의 전세계 1등으로 관련 기사 작성
4. 각 언론사가 꾸준히 로이터 기사를 3.6% 폭락 원인으로 지목
이 정도면 로이터는 언론, 금융계와 힘을 합쳐 테슬라 주가를 내리려고 조작하고 있다고 보는게 타당해 보입니다. 그리고 특히 당일 주가 하락도 책임을 져야 하지 않을까요?
IMPACT FROM REUTERS’ APR-5 REPORTS:
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
Impact:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
April 5 Incident:
An exclusive Reuters report on April 5 claimed Tesla was canceling its plans to produce a lower-cost EV, Model 2, leading to a rapid 6% drop in Tesla's stock price. CEO Elon Musk refuted the report within 30 minutes, declaring it untrue.
Media Confirmation:
Despite Musk’s denial, the report gained significant global traction. Yonhap News, one of the first to echo the story, has been noted for its connections with a Reuters reporter holding critical views on Tesla {1}.
Subsequent coverage by major outlets such as Investors' Business Day, Fox News, and the New York Post have confirmed the impact of Reuters' April 5 report on Tesla's stock fluctuations, with 22 articles specifically detailing declines in the market capital and stock price {2}.
2024-04-05 16:55ET New York Post
Tesla stock plunged by as much as 6.2% after the [Reuters'] initial report
Earnings Day Developments:
On Earnings Day, Tesla announced plans to accelerate the introduction of new models ahead of its previously scheduled second half of 2025, countering concerns about its innovation and market readiness. Both the CEO on Day 1 and Tesla representatives on Earnings Day consistently denied Reuters' April 5 report.
Call for Accountability:
The Reuters report is attributed with causing:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
Despite the significant financial consequences {3}, Reuters has not issued any corrections or acknowledged any inaccuracies in its coverage.
This raises serious concerns about media responsibility and the potential harm of unsupported reports on investor assets and market stability.
SEE BELOW
{1} REUTERS AND POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
{2} FULL LIST OF NEWS REPORTS
{3} 74 BILLION KRW ELS: THE RISK TO INVESTORS
![physhero's tweet photo. IMPACT FROM REUTERS’ APR-5 REPORTS:
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
Impact:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
April 5 Incident:
An exclusive Reuters report on April 5 claimed Tesla was canceling its plans to produce a lower-cost EV, Model 2, leading to a rapid 6% drop in Tesla's stock price. CEO Elon Musk refuted the report within 30 minutes, declaring it untrue.
Media Confirmation:
Despite Musk’s denial, the report gained significant global traction. Yonhap News, one of the first to echo the story, has been noted for its connections with a Reuters reporter holding critical views on Tesla {1}.
Subsequent coverage by major outlets such as Investors' Business Day, Fox News, and the New York Post have confirmed the impact of Reuters' April 5 report on Tesla's stock fluctuations, with 22 articles specifically detailing declines in the market capital and stock price {2}.
2024-04-05 16:55ET New York Post
Tesla stock plunged by as much as 6.2% after the [Reuters'] initial report
Earnings Day Developments:
On Earnings Day, Tesla announced plans to accelerate the introduction of new models ahead of its previously scheduled second half of 2025, countering concerns about its innovation and market readiness. Both the CEO on Day 1 and Tesla representatives on Earnings Day consistently denied Reuters' April 5 report.
Call for Accountability:
The Reuters report is attributed with causing:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
Despite the significant financial consequences {3}, Reuters has not issued any corrections or acknowledged any inaccuracies in its coverage.
This raises serious concerns about media responsibility and the potential harm of unsupported reports on investor assets and market stability.
SEE BELOW
{1} REUTERS AND POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
{2} FULL LIST OF NEWS REPORTS
{3} 74 BILLION KRW ELS: THE RISK TO INVESTORS](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GMygU4IacAATskp.jpg)
IMPACT FROM REUTERS’ APR-5 REPORTS:
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
Impact:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
April 5 Incident:
An exclusive Reuters report on April 5 claimed Tesla was canceling its plans to produce a lower-cost EV, Model 2, leading to a rapid 6% drop in Tesla's stock price. CEO Elon Musk refuted the report within 30 minutes, declaring it untrue.
Media Confirmation:
Despite Musk’s denial, the report gained significant global traction. Yonhap News, one of the first to echo the story, has been noted for its connections with a Reuters reporter holding critical views on Tesla {1}.
Subsequent coverage by major outlets such as Investors' Business Day, Fox News, and the New York Post have confirmed the impact of Reuters' April 5 report on Tesla's stock fluctuations, with 22 articles specifically detailing declines in the market capital and stock price {2}.
2024-04-05 16:55ET New York Post
Tesla stock plunged by as much as 6.2% after the [Reuters'] initial report
Earnings Day Developments:
On Earnings Day, Tesla announced plans to accelerate the introduction of new models ahead of its previously scheduled second half of 2025, countering concerns about its innovation and market readiness. Both the CEO on Day 1 and Tesla representatives on Earnings Day consistently denied Reuters' April 5 report.
Call for Accountability:
The Reuters report is attributed with causing:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
Despite the significant financial consequences {3}, Reuters has not issued any corrections or acknowledged any inaccuracies in its coverage.
This raises serious concerns about media responsibility and the potential harm of unsupported reports on investor assets and market stability.
SEE BELOW
{1} REUTERS AND POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
{2} FULL LIST OF NEWS REPORTS
{3} 74 BILLION KRW ELS: THE RISK TO INVESTORS
![physhero's tweet photo. IMPACT FROM REUTERS’ APR-5 REPORTS:
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
Impact:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
April 5 Incident:
An exclusive Reuters report on April 5 claimed Tesla was canceling its plans to produce a lower-cost EV, Model 2, leading to a rapid 6% drop in Tesla's stock price. CEO Elon Musk refuted the report within 30 minutes, declaring it untrue.
Media Confirmation:
Despite Musk’s denial, the report gained significant global traction. Yonhap News, one of the first to echo the story, has been noted for its connections with a Reuters reporter holding critical views on Tesla {1}.
Subsequent coverage by major outlets such as Investors' Business Day, Fox News, and the New York Post have confirmed the impact of Reuters' April 5 report on Tesla's stock fluctuations, with 22 articles specifically detailing declines in the market capital and stock price {2}.
2024-04-05 16:55ET New York Post
Tesla stock plunged by as much as 6.2% after the [Reuters'] initial report
Earnings Day Developments:
On Earnings Day, Tesla announced plans to accelerate the introduction of new models ahead of its previously scheduled second half of 2025, countering concerns about its innovation and market readiness. Both the CEO on Day 1 and Tesla representatives on Earnings Day consistently denied Reuters' April 5 report.
Call for Accountability:
The Reuters report is attributed with causing:
- A $1.8 billion loss in market capitalization.
- A 3.6% decline in Tesla's stock price.
- Continued investor concerns about Tesla.
Despite the significant financial consequences {3}, Reuters has not issued any corrections or acknowledged any inaccuracies in its coverage.
This raises serious concerns about media responsibility and the potential harm of unsupported reports on investor assets and market stability.
SEE BELOW
{1} REUTERS AND POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
{2} FULL LIST OF NEWS REPORTS
{3} 74 BILLION KRW ELS: THE RISK TO INVESTORS](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GMygU4IacAATskp.jpg)
KYOBO'S 74 BILLION KRW ELS: THE RISK TO INVESTORS
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
Background: Media and Finance Ties
Recent reports have uncovered potential conflicts of interest between anti-Tesla media and financial institutions like Kyobo Securities. This has sparked discussions about the reliability of news from agencies such as Reuters and Yonhap News.
... {1} Reuters and Potential Conflict of Interest ...
https://t.co/Oq216bRl9S
It has been suggested that negative media reports may have influenced the changes in Tesla’s share price. The financial gains from these fluctuations by certain groups were not clear until the disclosure of Kyobo's ELS issues.
Understanding Tesla-Linked ELS
Equity Linked Securities (ELS) are complex investments tied to Tesla's performance. Kyobo Securities has released 13 ELS products totaling 74 billion KRW, where investors could face significant losses if $TSLA falls to certain levels, aka the knock-in levels.
... {2} How Fund Companies Profit from Tesla-Linked ELS ...
https://t.co/Nkv287VeFO
The Cost of Knock-In Events
There are concerns that Kyobo may have used insider information to shake media stories for their benefit. This could result in Tesla’s shares reaching critical know-in levels, benefitting Kyobo financially at the expense of investors.
In fact, 12 out of 13 Kyobo's ELS products have hit these low points since 2022. The decline in Tesla’s share prices is worrisome for ELS investors, as it suggests potential heavy losses.
... {3} AMD/Tesla ELS 60% loss repaid this year 2023 ...
https://t.co/CJD25dK3xU
Conclusion
The situation with Kyobo's ELS and the roles of Reuters and Yonhap News show how powerful groups like these can affect investments. This case is a warning for all investors to stay alert. It's crucial to have clear and honest information when making financial decisions, as hidden agendas can significantly impact the market and your investments.

교보증권의 740억원 ELS 발행과 개인 투자자에 대한 리스크
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
배경: 언론과 금융기관의 알려진 관계
최근 반 테슬라 성향의 언론과 교보증권과 같은 금융기관 사이의 잠재적 이해관계 충돌이 밝혀졌다. 이는 로이터와 연합뉴스와 같은 기존 메이저 언론 기관의 신뢰성에 대한 논의를 촉발하여, 국내는 물론 미국 미디어(Epochs Times)에서도 주요하게 언급하였다.
... {1a} 로이터와 잠재적 이해관계 충돌 ...
https://t.co/Oq216bRl9S
... {2b} 언론의 신뢰성에 대한 의문 ...
https://t.co/Oy9pNGkH1T
기존부터 부정적인 언론 보도가 테슬라의 주가 변동에 영향을 미쳤을 수 있다는 주장이 있었지만, 특정 이익 집단이 이러한 시장의 변동성에서 얻는 금전적인 이득에 대해서는 알려진 바가 전혀 없었다. 본 글에서 증권사의 ELS 상품이 갖는 의구심에 대해서 확인해 본다.
테슬라 연계 ELS 이해하기
ELS(주식 연계 증권)는 테슬라와 같은 특정 주가와 연동된 투자 상품이다. 교보증권은 총 740억 원 상당의 13개 ELS 상품을 출시했는데, 테슬라의 주가가 특정 수준, 즉 원금 손실 구간(녹인, knock-in)까지 떨어질 경우 투자자들은 상당한 손실을 입을 수 있다.
... {2} 테슬라 연계 ELS로부터 수익을 얻는 펀드 회사들 ...
https://t.co/Nkv287VeFO
원금 손실 구간의 비용
증권사가 내부 정보를 사용하거나 자신들의 이익을 위해 언론 보도를 조작하여 큰 악영향을 줄 수 있다는 우려는 항상 있어왔다. 예를 들어 테슬라의 주식이 원금 손실 구간에 도달하게 된다면, 테슬라 연계 ELS를 발행한 증권사는 재정적 이득을 취하며 그 만큼 이를 구매한 투자자에게는 손실을 입힐 수 있다.
실제로, 2022년 이후 교보의 13개 ELS 상품 중 12개가 이러한 손실 구간에 진입했다. 따라서 ELS 투자자들에게 심각한 원금 손실 가능성을 시사하고 있다.
... {3} 올해 상환된 AMD·테슬라 ELS 60% 손실 ...
https://t.co/CJD25dK3xU
결론
본 글에서는 교보의 ELS 발행과 로이터, 연합뉴스의 역할이 서로 얽히면서 금융 투자에 어떠한 영향을 미칠 수 있는지 확인했다. 이 사례를 통해 모든 투자자들은 기업에 대한 정확한 정보를 선별하는 것이 중요하며, 특정 집단의 숨겨진 의도가 시장과 투자에 중대한 영향을 끼칠 가능성을 파악해야 겠다.
KYOBO'S 74 BILLION KRW ELS: THE RISK TO INVESTORS
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
Background: Media and Finance Ties
Recent reports have uncovered potential conflicts of interest between anti-Tesla media and financial institutions like Kyobo Securities. This has sparked discussions about the reliability of news from agencies such as Reuters and Yonhap News.
... {1} Reuters and Potential Conflict of Interest ...
https://t.co/Oq216bRl9S
It has been suggested that negative media reports may have influenced the changes in Tesla’s share price. The financial gains from these fluctuations by certain groups were not clear until the disclosure of Kyobo's ELS issues.
Understanding Tesla-Linked ELS
Equity Linked Securities (ELS) are complex investments tied to Tesla's performance. Kyobo Securities has released 13 ELS products totaling 74 billion KRW, where investors could face significant losses if $TSLA falls to certain levels, aka the knock-in levels.
... {2} How Fund Companies Profit from Tesla-Linked ELS ...
https://t.co/Nkv287VeFO
The Cost of Knock-In Events
There are concerns that Kyobo may have used insider information to shake media stories for their benefit. This could result in Tesla’s shares reaching critical know-in levels, benefitting Kyobo financially at the expense of investors.
In fact, 12 out of 13 Kyobo's ELS products have hit these low points since 2022. The decline in Tesla’s share prices is worrisome for ELS investors, as it suggests potential heavy losses.
... {3} AMD/Tesla ELS 60% loss repaid this year 2023 ...
https://t.co/CJD25dK3xU
Conclusion
The situation with Kyobo's ELS and the roles of Reuters and Yonhap News show how powerful groups like these can affect investments. This case is a warning for all investors to stay alert. It's crucial to have clear and honest information when making financial decisions, as hidden agendas can significantly impact the market and your investments.

KYOBO'S 74 BILLION KRW ELS: THE RISK TO INVESTORS
#MediaFUD, #Tesla, $TSLA
Background: Media and Finance Ties
Recent reports have uncovered potential conflicts of interest between anti-Tesla media and financial institutions like Kyobo Securities. This has sparked discussions about the reliability of news from agencies such as Reuters and Yonhap News.
... {1} Reuters and Potential Conflict of Interest ...
https://t.co/Oq216bRl9S
It has been suggested that negative media reports may have influenced the changes in Tesla’s share price. The financial gains from these fluctuations by certain groups were not clear until the disclosure of Kyobo's ELS issues.
Understanding Tesla-Linked ELS
Equity Linked Securities (ELS) are complex investments tied to Tesla's performance. Kyobo Securities has released 13 ELS products totaling 74 billion KRW, where investors could face significant losses if $TSLA falls to certain levels, aka the knock-in levels.
... {2} How Fund Companies Profit from Tesla-Linked ELS ...
https://t.co/Nkv287VeFO
The Cost of Knock-In Events
There are concerns that Kyobo may have used insider information to shake media stories for their benefit. This could result in Tesla’s shares reaching critical know-in levels, benefitting Kyobo financially at the expense of investors.
In fact, 12 out of 13 Kyobo's ELS products have hit these low points since 2022. The decline in Tesla’s share prices is worrisome for ELS investors, as it suggests potential heavy losses.
... {3} AMD/Tesla ELS 60% loss repaid this year 2023 ...
https://t.co/CJD25dK3xU
Conclusion
The situation with Kyobo's ELS and the roles of Reuters and Yonhap News show how powerful groups like these can affect investments. This case is a warning for all investors to stay alert. It's crucial to have clear and honest information when making financial decisions, as hidden agendas can significantly impact the market and your investments.

How Fund Companies Profit from Tesla-Linked ELS (UPDATED)
UPDATED 2024-04-27
Introduction
Interest groups might use media to generate negative sentiment (#MediaFUD) against Tesla for various reasons. A significant motivation could be the potential financial gains from issuing Equity-Linked Securities (ELS).
Here’s an outline of how securities firms can profit by issuing ELS, at the expense of individual investors.
Impact of $TSLA Changes on ELS in 3 Key Ways:
1. Guaranteed Returns (Green):
If Tesla's stock never reaches the knock-in barrier (e.g., a 35% drop from the initial price) during the 1 to 3-year term of the ELS, companies are obligated to pay the agreed-upon return to the individual investors.
2. Recovery After Breach (Blue):
If the stock price drops to the knock-in barrier but then goes up past a certain point before the due date, investors still get their promised return.
3. Losses Below Barrier (Red):
If Tesla’s stock breaks the knock-in barrier and remains below the upper limit, the entire fund suffers losses proportional to Tesla’s decline.
Investors’ Loss = Companies’ Profit
In cases where the stock price falls below the barrier, the securities firm often gains. This happens because the ELS fund might only be half made up of Tesla-related assets. Even if the other assets in the ELS do well, the firm still pays out much less to investors.
This setup allows the fund company to increase its profits when investors are losing money.😭

증권사가 숏치는 방법: #Tesla - ELS 활용 (곱버스)
#MediaFUD, $TSLA
특정 집단이 테슬라의 여론을 통해 주가 를 누른다고 가정한다면, 주가 파생 상품인 ELS로 어떻게 증권사들이 이익을 얻는지 시나리오를 확인해 보았습니다.
1. 약정 수익 지급 (녹색)
테슬라 주가가 손실구간(예: 초기가격의 -35%)을 한번도 내려가지 않고 만기시
2. 손실구간 터치 & 복구 (파란색)
테슬라 주가가 손실구간 밑으로 가도 상한선 위로 올라가서 만기시 약정 수익 지급
3. 테슬라 주가 비율 손실 (빨간색)
테슬라 주가가 손실구간 밑으로 가고 상한선을 복구 못 하면 테슬라 주가에 비례한 전체 펀드의 손실 발생
증권사 입장에서 ESL에는 테슬라를 절반 내외로 담기 때문에 테슬라 주가가 떨어질 수록 곱버스(레버리지 + 인버스) 효과로 이익 발생
더 잘 아시는 분들 계시면 코멘트 환영합니다.😀

How Fund Companies Profit from Tesla-Linked ELS
Interest groups may seek to suppress $TSLA through #MediaFUD. Here's a scenario of how securities firms might benefit by issuing Equity-Linked Securities (ELS).
Based on the initial price, $TSLA impacts ELS in 3 key ways:
1. Guaranteed Returns (Green)
If #Tesla's stock never reaches the knock-in barrier (e.g., -35% of the initial price) during the term, the agreed-upon return is guaranteed.
2. Recovery After Breach (Blue)
If the stock hits the knock-in barrier but rises above the upper limit and remains there at maturity, the agreed return is still guaranteed.
3. Losses Below Barrier (Red)
If Tesla’s stock breaks the knock-in barrier and stays below the upper limit, the entire fund experiences losses proportional to the stock's decline.
This ultimately benefits the securities firm, particularly since the ELS fund may be composed of only about half Tesla-related assets. As $TSLA drops, the firm pays out less to investors, thereby increasing its benefits.

#MediaFUD
So far, 3 media channels have raised questions about Reuters' biased coverage of Tesla. Only 20% of the Tesla news has been positive.
[1] Mocar
https://t.co/BCUpmzaXws
[2] Auto Engineer American Life
https://t.co/YlMpSRnvVw
[3] Epoch Times
https://t.co/6ZevVTRTaw
![physhero's tweet photo. #MediaFUD
So far, 3 media channels have raised questions about Reuters' biased coverage of Tesla. Only 20% of the Tesla news has been positive.
[1] Mocar
https://t.co/BCUpmzaXws
[2] Auto Engineer American Life
https://t.co/YlMpSRnvVw
[3] Epoch Times
https://t.co/6ZevVTRTaw https://t.co/mN0YSDTuTd](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLxrJC9bwAEg5OM.jpg)
TESLA-MEDIA WAR
#MediaFUD, #03
THEIR HISTORY
Elon Musk has been questioning Reuters since around 2013 about their way of covering EVs and Tesla's capabilities. He thinks this isn't just an isolated instance, but a consistent issue.
The chart shows that in 2021, when Tesla's stock price went up 10 times, Reuters assigned a reporter who has written 270 articles on Tesla, many of which portrayed the company negatively. Musk also stepped up his complaints about their articles during this time. He said, "Reuters is lying (again)".
CUASE OF DROP?
At first glance, it's not clear if Reuters' stories directly caused changes in Tesla's stock prices. But, the chart suggests a connection. It’s critical to decide whether Tesla's stock dropped first, leading to more negative articles, or it was the other way around. At least, the data show there's a noticeable link.
NEWS COMES FIRST {1}
From the detailed analysis of the 270 articles, a pattern has been observed: when Tesla's stock fell, Reuters often had negative articles that day. With the reporter already much leaning towards negative stories, people began to believe that Reuters articles might predict Tesla's stock price drops. This theory gained traction as investors observed that periods of negative news matched up with drops in Tesla's stock.
@AnAswman75: 💯 well said with the facts ...
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
It is essential for large media outlets like Reuters to maintain neutral reporting. Otherwise, investors might start thinking they are working with certain groups to hurt innovation and disrupt the stock market {2}.
@iceagetv: please start investigation about that is clearly a market manipulation pyramide @SECGov ...
@FuturaeVitae: @SEC_Enforcement @SECGov under investigation already?
REFERENCE
{1} Which Comes First: Reuters' FUDs or $TSLA Drops?
https://t.co/ngmydD5sae
{2} Reuters and Potential Conflict of Interest
https://t.co/Oq216bRl9S

Reuters and Potential Conflict of Interest
A Reuters reporter, known for criticisms of Tesla, turns out to have family connections to Korean media and financial industries.
This was unintentionally discovered from an obituary in 2023 {1}. For example, Yonhap News has republished many of these anti-Tesla articles from her articles in Reuters. Notably, the CEO of Tesla, @elonmusk, labeled Reuters as a liar.
Significantly, this family network includes a connection to Kyobo Securities, an issuer of Tesla-related Equity-Linked Securities (ELS).
Hypothetically, if an ELS issuer had access to unreleased news that could cause a temporary drop in Tesla's stock price, they couold benefit by paying out less to investors.
This creates a potential conflict of interest.
{1}https://t.co/Z1ZHx6Z8wr

#MediaFUD
Reuters의 FUD 또는 $TSLA Drops 중 어느 것이 먼저 오나요?
로이터의 FUD
언론 매체는 오랫동안 개인 투자자들 사이에 두려움, 불확실성, 의심(FUD)을 퍼뜨린다는 비난을 받아왔습니다. 수년 동안 반테슬라 미디어로 분류되어 온 로이터 통신을 예로 들어 보겠습니다.
'진현주 테슬라'라는 검색어를 이용하면 2021년 테슬라의 비트코인부터 2024년 모델 2 취소까지 약 270개의 게시물이 나와 있다. 부정적 50%, 중립 30%, 긍정적 20%로 나눌 수 있다. {1} .
테슬라가 가장 미국산 자동차 제조사로 알려진 만큼, 미국 로이터 통신이 자신들의 오해를 불러일으키는 FUD를 대량생산하고 있는 것은 안타까운 일이다. 이는 다음과 같이 분류될 수 있습니다.
FUD 1. 엘론 머스크:
뉴스에서는 특히 그가 Tesla 주식을 많이 팔거나 Twitter 인수와 같이 다른 회사에 관여할 때 그의 결정과 발언이 Tesla의 사업에 영향을 미칠 수 있다는 점을 종종 우려합니다.
FUD 2. 자동 조종 장치 및 안전 문제:
Autopilot과 관련된 안전 보고서, 리콜 공지 및 법적 서류에 대한 검색이 있습니다.
FUD 3. 재무 및 수입:
기사에서는 Tesla가 얼마나 많은 수익을 올리고 있는지, 얼마나 많은 자동차를 판매하는지, Elon Musk가 Tesla 주식을 판매하는지 여부에 대해 논의합니다.
FUD 4. 생산 및 배송 문제:
때때로 Tesla는 Cybertruck과 같이 충분히 빠른 자동차를 생산하는 데 어려움을 겪습니다. 기사에서는 이러한 지연이 고객을 실망시키거나 Tesla의 이익에 어떤 영향을 미칠 수 있는지 지적할 수 있습니다.
FUD 5. 시장 경쟁:
특히 중국과 같은 대규모 시장에서 더 많은 회사가 자체 전기 자동차를 판매하기 시작하면 Tesla가 앞서 나갈 수 있을지 여부에 많은 관심이 집중되고 있습니다.
누가 FUD를 판매했습니까 $TSLA ?
로이터의 부정적인 기사와 $TSLA 가격을 일치시켜 대중에게 영향을 미치고 가격 하락을 초래할 수 있는 A~N 사례가 14건 있었습니다.
그러나 이러한 에피소드는 Reuters가 어떻게 Tesla의 가치를 과소평가하는지를 조명할 뿐만 아니라 투자자의 마음을 형성하는 데 있어 미디어의 역할에 대한 의문도 제기합니다. 두려워하는 마음은 수십억 달러의 손실로 이어질 수 있으며, 이는 곧 엄청난 후회를 가져옵니다. 로이터로부터 소식을 듣고 $TSLA 매도한 적이 있습니까?
초점은 책임을 묻는 것이 아니라 주식 시장에서 언론의 힘과 그에 따른 책임을 이해하는 것입니다. 결국 눈물을 흘리며 SELL 버튼을 누른 것은 바로 당신이었습니다.
{1} 아래 답변에서 267개 헤드라인의 전체 목록을 확인하세요.
#MediaFUD
Which Comes First: Reuters' FUDs or $TSLA Drops?
Reuters' FUDs
Media outlets have long been accused of spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) among individual investors. Take, for example, Reuters, which has been labeled as anti-Tesla media for years.
Using the search keyword 'HYUNJOO JIN TESLA', there are about 270 posts ranging from Tesla's bitcoin in 2021 to the cancellation of Model 2 in 2024. They can be divided into 50% negative, 30% neutral, and 20% positive {1}.
As Tesla is known as the most American-made carmaker, it's a pity that Reuters in the US is mass-producing their misleading FUDs. These can be categorized as follows:
FUD 1. Elon Musk:
News often worries that his decisions and statements might affect Tesla's business, especially when he sells a lot of Tesla's stock or gets involved with other companies, like buying Twitter.
FUD 2. Autopilot and Safety Concerns:
There are searches for safety reports, recall notices, and legal filings related to Autopilot.
FUD 3. Financial and Earnings:
Articles discuss how much profit Tesla is making, how many cars it's selling, or if Elon Musk is selling his shares of Tesla stock.
FUD 4. Production and Delivery Issues:
Sometimes, Tesla has trouble producing cars fast enough, like the Cybertruck. Articles might point out how these delays could disappoint customers or affect Tesla's profits.
FUD 5. Market Competition:
There's a lot of focus on whether Tesla can stay ahead when more companies start selling their own electric cars, especially in big markets like China.
Who Sold $TSLA from FUDs?
Through matching Reuters' negative articles with $TSLA prices, there have been these 14 cases A~N that might affect the public and cause the price drops.
But, these episodes, not only spotlight how Reuters underestimates Tesla's valuation but also raise questions about the media's role in shaping investors' minds. Fearful minds can lead to billions of dollars lost, which soon brings enormous regrets. Have you ever sold $TSLA after hearing the news from Reuters?
The focus is not to assign blame but to understand the power of the press in stock markets and the responsibility that comes with it. In the end, it was you who pressed the SELL button with tears.
{1} See the full list of 267 headlines in the reply below.

It’ll take time to correct non-EV drivers’ #MediaFUD about eco-harmful EVs like Tesla.
Consider the manufacturing and mining processes involved in making EVs. They emit fewer greenhouse gases, not to mention the zero emissions during their operational lifespan.
#EVorGas, #02
91% OF EV DRIVERS SATISFIED
The 2023 survey conducted in Korea underscores the influence of firsthand experience with EVs such as #Tesla in shaping drivers' perceptions {1}.
KEY FINDINGS
1. 91% of EV owners express satisfaction, highlighting a significant contrast to the 59% of non-EV drivers. Hands-on EV experience correlates with positive views, mirroring the loyalty observed among iPhone users (92%).
2. Despite statistical evidence indicating ICE vehicle fires are 20 times more common, 55% of non-EV drivers still hold fears of fire accidents on EVs (24% for EV drivers) {2}.
3. Only 46% of non-EV drivers believe EVs are eco-friendly.
CONCLUSION
Addressing EV misinformation among non-EV drivers is paramount. Encouraging firsthand experience will foster their positive attitudes and correct understanding.
REFERENCE
{1}https://t.co/sb0TUWUJE1
{2}https://t.co/c6Sdl2TseD

#MediaFUD
The full list of 267 headlines from Reuters
https://t.co/sJEZYgU15e
#MediaFUD
Which Comes First: Reuters' FUDs or $TSLA Drops?
Reuters' FUDs
Media outlets have long been accused of spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) among individual investors. Take, for example, Reuters, which has been labeled as anti-Tesla media for years.
Using the search keyword 'HYUNJOO JIN TESLA', there are about 270 posts ranging from Tesla's bitcoin in 2021 to the cancellation of Model 2 in 2024. They can be divided into 50% negative, 30% neutral, and 20% positive {1}.
As Tesla is known as the most American-made carmaker, it's a pity that Reuters in the US is mass-producing their misleading FUDs. These can be categorized as follows:
FUD 1. Elon Musk:
News often worries that his decisions and statements might affect Tesla's business, especially when he sells a lot of Tesla's stock or gets involved with other companies, like buying Twitter.
FUD 2. Autopilot and Safety Concerns:
There are searches for safety reports, recall notices, and legal filings related to Autopilot.
FUD 3. Financial and Earnings:
Articles discuss how much profit Tesla is making, how many cars it's selling, or if Elon Musk is selling his shares of Tesla stock.
FUD 4. Production and Delivery Issues:
Sometimes, Tesla has trouble producing cars fast enough, like the Cybertruck. Articles might point out how these delays could disappoint customers or affect Tesla's profits.
FUD 5. Market Competition:
There's a lot of focus on whether Tesla can stay ahead when more companies start selling their own electric cars, especially in big markets like China.
Who Sold $TSLA from FUDs?
Through matching Reuters' negative articles with $TSLA prices, there have been these 14 cases A~N that might affect the public and cause the price drops.
But, these episodes, not only spotlight how Reuters underestimates Tesla's valuation but also raise questions about the media's role in shaping investors' minds. Fearful minds can lead to billions of dollars lost, which soon brings enormous regrets. Have you ever sold $TSLA after hearing the news from Reuters?
The focus is not to assign blame but to understand the power of the press in stock markets and the responsibility that comes with it. In the end, it was you who pressed the SELL button with tears.
{1} See the full list of 267 headlines in the reply below.

#Bitcoin en a rien à carrer de sa petite croisade de lobbyiste clientéliste, il existera encore après elle.
Le problème c'est que les médias la placent en "experte" qu'elle n'est pas.
#cryptomonnaie #cryptocurrency #cryptotwitter #CryptoNews #btc #Crypto #media #fud #mediafud
#Cryptos : "J'attends qu'on nous prouve la valeur ajoutée de ce secteur. Pour l'instant, cela ne crée que des problèmes. Et [les acteurs] viennent nous dire ensuite : on a la solution !" @AuroreLalucq #Narretepasleco @franceinter
@gme_posh_pug @GameStop @Forbes @thisisinsider Can’t go back from their pieces they published this morning. I hope they tank along with hedgefunds

🤔🔥🤔🌪 Explosion VS Implosion... Who’s right ???
The positive news is that all scenarios are covered ! Thanks to the media 😅📈📉💯💯
#btc #bitcoin #crypto #mediaFUD @CryptoCoinsNews @crypto @fundstrat @Super_Crypto

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
actreszaddictz
Seen from Vietnam
escortnews
Seen from Turkey
ThrowingShade
Seen from United States
纸尿裤
Seen from Japan
QUALISUD
Seen from United Kingdom
kayserieskort
Seen from Turkey
teenage(((())))
Seen from Peru
meghashuklahot
Seen from India
アグー豚背脂の北海道辛味噌ラーメン
Seen from United Kingdom
diyarbakirgay
Seen from Turkey
Most Popular Users

Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.9M followers

Barack Obama 
@barackobama
119.2M followers

Donald J. Trump 
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers

Cristiano Ronaldo 
@cristiano
111.7M followers

Narendra Modi 
@narendramodi
107.1M followers

Rihanna 
@rihanna
97.9M followers

NASA 
@nasa
92.2M followers

Justin Bieber 
@justinbieber
91.1M followers

KATY PERRY 
@katyperry
88.2M followers

Taylor Swift 
@taylorswift13
82.1M followers

Lady Gaga 
@ladygaga
73.6M followers

Virat Kohli 
@imvkohli
70.8M followers

Kim Kardashian 
@kimkardashian
70.1M followers

YouTube 
@youtube
68.7M followers

Bill Gates 
@billgates
64.2M followers

Neymar Jr 
@neymarjr
63.7M followers

The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers

CNN 
@cnn
61.8M followers

Selena Gomez 
@selenagomez
61.3M followers

X 
@x
60.8M followers


![physhero's tweet photo. #MediaFUD
So far, 3 media channels have raised questions about Reuters' biased coverage of Tesla. Only 20% of the Tesla news has been positive.
[1] Mocar
https://t.co/BCUpmzaXws
[2] Auto Engineer American Life
https://t.co/YlMpSRnvVw
[3] Epoch Times
https://t.co/6ZevVTRTaw https://t.co/mN0YSDTuTd](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLxm1jka4AEsI2r.jpg)
![physhero's tweet photo. #MediaFUD
So far, 3 media channels have raised questions about Reuters' biased coverage of Tesla. Only 20% of the Tesla news has been positive.
[1] Mocar
https://t.co/BCUpmzaXws
[2] Auto Engineer American Life
https://t.co/YlMpSRnvVw
[3] Epoch Times
https://t.co/6ZevVTRTaw https://t.co/mN0YSDTuTd](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLxm0pxawAANmSn.jpg)







