Top Tweets for #NazcaScam

One minute they’re humans, next they’re humanoid reptilian. Someone from the west really needs to help these people out with wording (translating) and the proper way to handle remains. But here is the most important thing, if a specimen is covered in diatomaceous earth, especially one reportedly preserved with chemicals like cadmium chloride, it should be handled as potentially hazardous archaeological or laboratory material. Proper PPE would typically include nitrile gloves to prevent contamination and skin contact, safety goggles to protect the eyes from airborne particles, and at minimum an N95 respirator, though a P100 respirator would be safer if heavy dust exposure is possible. A lab coat or disposable protective suit would also help prevent cross contamination. The specimen should ideally be handled in a well ventilated area or under local exhaust ventilation to avoid inhaling fine particles. Soft brushes and gentle tools are usually preferred over compressed air or rough handling methods to avoid damaging the specimen or spreading dust into the air. If cadmium chloride is truly present, the situation becomes more serious because cadmium compounds are toxic and require stricter hazardous material precautions. Source 1: https://t.co/ODdKGAWKlr Source 2: https://t.co/iKRiMJihHU https://t.co/5pjGdQL14Z shows some PPE. Knowledge is Power

I recommend that people read the full report by archaeologist José Luis Quispe Orosco. At this point, it is no longer accurate for the skeptic community to claim that no formal archaeologist has been involved or has studied the case. 🖖 The report makes it clear that there is no definitive archaeological context for where the bodies were discovered. They are recognized as real cultural assets, but there is no clear evidence linking them to a specific known culture. It also includes a notable observation: due to the presence of cotton adhered to one of the bodies, it is possible that the individual may have lived and developed along the southern coast of Peru. I think this is a new discovery. https://t.co/YYGTLdRE5g

Jorge Flores, legal counsel for the tridactyl research team, explains the implications of María and Wawita being declared Cultural Heritage assets. He also notes that the Ministry of Culture has requested the same process be initiated for any other tridactyl specimens that arrive at or are currently held by the University of Ica.

If the 'discovery site' would help validate the authenticity of these bodies as non-human or anomalous, then the mafia/thieves would have shown us the discovery site by now. It would increase the sales value of specimens. That much is obvious. So we know the origin point is actually a problem for the narrative. That remains a red flag that most people should be able to agree upon. I am not an expert in ancient bodies and it is up to others to duke that out, but I do understand criminality, extortion, theft, fraud, money laundering and media manipulation - there is a lot of all that in this case. Enough to put me off and to stop caring whether the bodies are 'real'. I will focus on my own investigation of prehistoric alien visitation, as it does not involve any criminality or boosting criminals' earnings.