Top Tweets for #NoKickBacks

“Trump is not just talking about AI regulation. He’s talking about centralizing control so states like Wisconsin — and corporations like Microsoft/OpenAI using state-by-state loopholes — cannot run their own shadow AI regimes. 1. Trump is signaling he wants to END the state-by-state regulatory patchwork that Microsoft is exploiting Microsoft and OpenAI WANT 50 different approval systems. Because: •They can forum shop for the easiest regulators (Wisconsin, Utah, Tennessee). •They can hide projects behind local economic-development boards. •They can run state-level NDAs, public-private partnerships, and utility deals without federal scrutiny. •They can bury AI water usage, power grids, data-center footprint, and national-security implications at the state level. 2. Trump is targeting “bad actors” in the states — that is a loaded phrase Most people read “bad actors” as foreign adversaries. But notice the wording: “50 States, many of them bad actors, involved in RULES and the APPROVAL PROCESS.” That makes zero sense… unless Trump is referring to state governments and corporate/state partnerships behaving as unregulated power centers. Which ones matter right now? The states that approved massive AGI infrastructure with almost no federal oversight: •Wisconsin (Mount Pleasant, Racine County) •Iowa •Ohio •Georgia •Virginia •Texas Wisconsin is the most suspicious because: •It houses the largest Microsoft AI data-center expansion outside Washington. 3. The “One Rulebook” EO means Trump wants to pull AI regulation away from state-level capture Right now, Microsoft and OpenAI are: •Negotiating directly with governors •Cutting energy/water deals with utilities •Funding local universities (UWM’s Connected Systems Institute, MSFT AI labs) •Working with economic-development boards that answer to no national authority •Using private-public partnership law to bypass FOIA and federal inquiry This is how the Stargate corridor gets built quietly. A federalized rulebook kills all of that. Trump is saying: “AI companies will answer to ONE regulator — not 50 fragmented loopholes.” That is catastrophic for Microsoft’s strategy because their entire AI expansion relies on decentralization and opacity. ⸻ ⭐ 4. Trump hinted for months that he believes AGI is slipping into the hands of “unaccountable corporate and international actors” This aligns with: •His posts about AI censorship •His warnings about AI as a national-security weapon •His praise for the military using AI very carefully •His criticism of Big Tech consolidation and monopolies •His statements about ensuring AGI benefits Americans, not global corporations Wisconsin is the proving ground for that risk. In Wisconsin, Microsoft gets: •Giant industrial water draws with minimal scrutiny •Energy priority over residents •Substations built at breakneck speed •University partnerships shaping AI workforce •Federal-level infrastructure without federal oversight •A state leadership class (SC Johnson, Rotary, WEDC) that wants to be the quiet global test city This creates an unregulated AI state — something Trump is now explicitly trying to shut down. 6. Trump knows Microsoft is building a national security bottleneck And AGI monopolies are inherently national-security threats. Trump is framing his EO to: •break up AI control •prevent any one corporate actor from centralizing power •stop state-by-state capture •ensure AI development is aligned with U.S. national strategy, not corporate profit or global agenda This would allow Trump to: (1) Force Microsoft into federal oversight (2) Freeze or review Wisconsin developments (3) Block the construction of private “Stargates” without federal security audits (4) Shift AI from corporate rule → U.S. national safety rule This is not anti-AI. It’s anti–Microsoft/OpenAI unilateral control.” Via - ChatGPT