Top Tweets for #Reviewer3
#Reviewer3
Need to check out before commenting.
I’ve been frustrated for years by how slow, biased, and unpredictable peer review can be.
So I stopped complaining and built something different.
Reviewer 3 is your own panel of expert reviewers. They read your paper, highlight strengths and weaknesses, and now link every comment directly to your manuscript.
It started as a side project. Now it’s handled 9,000+ papers, and 88% of researchers say it’s as good or better than human review.
Here’s a sample review if you’d like to see what AI peer review looks like: https://t.co/q4rQPEm6v9
This #ReadingWeek at @tcddublin, while the students in @TCDBusiness and @tcdengineering are going over their notes, our reading list looks a little different:
Zhao, C. et al. (2024)
Zambian 8th National Development Plan
Comments from #Reviewer3 (#iykyk)
Whebi, Z. et al (2023)
A academia will never change #reviewer3
OMG, this is killing me 😂😂😂
"We sincerely thank #Reviewer3 for their thoughtful and constructive feedback. We have now tested the effects of flying on commercial flights on our main phenotype, and the results are presented in Supplementary Figure 89."
Flight diverted after passenger finds live mouse in meal https://t.co/x7pXbmogiP
🆕‼️ Researchers using human-relevant methods shouldn't be pressured by #Reviewer3 to add animal experiments to their paper just to get it published. Now, @TheCOLAAB has a living resource to help them avoid & address these requests.
At https://t.co/T21uSLblDd, researchers can find tips & resources for:
📓Preparing their experiments
✍️Preparing their paper
🔎Selecting a good journal
📤Responding to reviewers who request animal experiments, & more
We're so proud to be a part of this team! Unfounded biases shouldn't stand in the way of good science. 🧑🔬
Huge thank you to our partners at @PCRM (who did the heavy lifting here), @HSIGlobal, @FRAMEcharity, & @YorkStJohn.
The COLAAB website is live!
👉https://t.co/kzyzRR4BJH
It provides info about #AnimalMethodsBias and houses the resource we created for researchers who use animal-free approaches to help avoid its negative consequences. Check it out and share with your colleagues!
@#reviewer1: Thank you, that's very useful feedback! 🫶
@#reviewer2: I'm not sure if we're talking about the same paper. 🤔
@#reviewer3: Thank you for ... nothing. 😑
Academia 🙄😄
Great news. The sooner the better. Lots to do on high throughput studies on our own machines. Just what I asked for when I was #reviewer3 but was not allowed to see @GoogleDeepMind authors’ response by @Nature editors.
We love the excitement & results from the community on AlphaFold 3 and are doubling the AF Server daily job limit to 20. Happy to also share that we're working on releasing the AF3 model (incl weights) for academic use, which doesn’t depend on our research infra, within 6 months.
#Reviewer3 is underwhelmed by analysis of dipole moment differences between drugs and patented compounds
Reviewer #2 delivering their comments to the manuscript authors #AcademicTwitter
Good to know that if you don't like #reviewer3, you can always ask it to be removed (at least for @Nature submissions).
Demis -- I think AlphaFold3 is really exciting. As Reviewer #3, I got great results from the server. I tried hard to get @Nature to urge you to release the code but was unsuccessful. I did not get it for re-review so I don't know if you responded. So why no code? @GoogleDeepMind
Possibly this is why they might have demanded that #reviewer3 was removed from review of the revision, a privilege which no other set of authors would be granted by @nature.
"There’s no real reason for me not to do this but I’m only doing it to make the reviewers happy"
How many scientists would dare to place the above in footnote of the paper? #reviewdays #Reviewer3
量子计算之恐怖谷（
It’s a #BlueMonday miracle not just #reviewer1 but #reviewer2 & #reviewer3 saying nice things obvs in an #AcademicTwitter way but revise and resubmit and Allons y @MCPCRD could it be the large RCT we did #mepfac @NIHRresearch hard to poke holes 🕳️ really #pallonc #fatigue
#ica24 rejected, but sending good vibes to the #reviewer3 who understood what the paper was about, and to the other two, who found time to write a paragraph and not a half-sentence of comments. good review work is priceless
(1) 🦆roti, medium🌶️(2) need to get the BoS sigh back on gate (3) #Reviewer3's hammock in which drafts and proofs of Nature of Ligand Efficiency were checked
㊗️References🥇https://t.co/lX1uIV4kgG
#reviewer3
With love from #reviewer3: There's a difference between using multiple #omics, and performing #multiomics. Hint: sounds like integration. #badwagon #science. Please don't write anything just bcz it sounds fancy. Understand meaning first.
Just got reviews back from a paper with seven reviewers! For those keeping score, that’s five #reviewer3
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.1M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
112.8M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.5M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.9M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
74.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71.9M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.4M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
64.8M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.6M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.1M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers