Top Tweets for #TOTALES
#TOTALES 📊
Total Market Cap excluding stablecoins.
Comparing with the last bear phase ending in 2022, you see that once we reclaim the EMA's 21, 25, and 34 on a weekly basis, it typically takes a lot of weeks to consolidate. ⏳
Does history repeat, or is this time different? 🤔
For me personally, I don't expect months of consolidation around the EMA's.
WHY? Well, because in 2023 we broke out after a bear market, this year we break out after a mid-cycle correction (something we have talked about for a long time). 🔄
I think the last phase of the cycle that began in 2023 is about to start now. With this, ETH and some alts will be the leaders. 🚀
The only question for me is: will BTC do a new ATH, or will it be something shallow while ETH and some alts do crazy returns? 👽
bitcoin:native ethereum:native #crypto #altcoins

Here’s the #TOTALES chart (net of stables) with the time cycles as per Ichimoku Time Theory. It tells the same story as $TOTAL btw
June = HTF low. Macro bottom? No. That’s what Ichimoku says here (2M TF). There’s no ambiguity here. Maybe I’m missing something, but this chart is pretty clear for me. So I’m sticking with my view
The 2W TF says the same thing, btw. H-L and L-H counts have always worked (6 times), but this time they don’t line up
And what do you do with all that? Either you follow the system you rely on, or you don’t do this at all. Because right now the question is when to buy. Later, it will be when to sell. I want to have something to rely on, rather than simply following what everyone on CX is saying

What we’re seeing on the $OTHERS chart is basically Lite Mode. That can’t be the altcoin bottom. The diminishing correction can’t be such extreme. It’s even smaller than the 2021 mid-cycle correction
And Ichimoku also says February was not a macro low time-wise

appreciation moment for how crystal clear the macro structure is on the #totales chart. words are not needed, every word I'd try to add to explain would take something away from this chart

#TOTALES the monthly candle is likely breaking this resistance this month.

#TOTALES is about to do something funny. 1.618 is the bearish target. 2.618 is the more realistic one

@Asismet_IF Dicen que el próximo siglo (2100), #Perú tendrá mas #eclipses #totales en su territorio.
#totales is on macro horizontal support, within the macro channel, while volume points towards the re-accumulation coming to an end. Then there is the broadening wedge of course.

#totales closed the daily above it while btc and total failed. Interesting. They will do so today then

BTC is performing a bullish retest on last months volume point of control btw.

#TOTALES
Even bulls in my comment section get angry about this chart, 10x for the total crypto mcap excluding stablecoins? They don't think its possible. That's the signal.

#TOTALES broadening wedge & horizontal resistance/support. This monthly close will be interesting. Same applies to $TOTAL and BTC.

#TOTALES
RR is to the upside.

#TOTALES
The monthly candle below support will likely end up being a psyop by the market makers before sending it vertical

#TOTALES RR is to the upside

#TOTALES pick your bullium fighter.
Do you pick the virgin diminishing returns 1.618 level or the chad old school cycle 2.618 fib?

Yes the flow memory's average projection perfectly hits the channel top without knowing that there is a channel line there that I manually drew.
But that can't possibly happen due to diminishing returns something something right?
rright?
#totales

If the wave count for the total crypto market cap (excluding stablecoins) is similar to the one shown in the quoted $BTC post, the Fibonacci ratios between waves are just incredible.
Leonardo seems to agree with this...
#TOTALES

$BTC 2022-2026 Wave Count Scenario
As I mentioned in a recent post, Bitcoin’s breach of $60k last week confirmed that we remain inside the expanded flat correction that started in late 2024. According to my current wave count for the advance from the 2022 low (quoted post), wave (4) has now retraced 53% over 18 months, compared to wave (2)’s 20% retracement in just 2 months. A 2.6x difference in retracement depth and a 9x difference in duration between two corrective waves within the same impulse does not follow the Elliott Wave guideline of equality (or proportionality). This reduces the probability of that count considerably.
Because of this, the wave count shown in the attached chart is now more probable. It better satisfies the equality guideline and displays cleaner Fibonacci relationships:
- Wave 4 retraced 33.27%, which is approximately 1.5x wave 2’s 22.18% retracement (close to the 1.618 relationship).
- Wave 4’s duration (182 days) is much closer to wave 2’s (154 days).
- The full impulse from late 2022 to late 2024 [wave (1), 742 days] and the current expanded flat [wave (2), 546 days] also show more balanced durations.
- From the all-time high, wave (2) has nearly reached the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement of the entire rally from the 2022 low—a common target for a wave of this magnitude.
I’m not particularly fond of this count for two reasons:
1. Unless the entire #Bitcoin Supercycle wave has already completed (low probability), we would still need at least three more major waves to finish the larger structure. This implies we may be in a very extended Cycle.
2. If we are indeed in an extension, my HTF wave count from the 2010 inception may require future refinements.
That said, trading and analysis aren’t about what we like or expect—they’re about what price actually does.
For now, I’m staying pragmatic: the exact labeling of the HTF structure doesn't matter right now because both viable counts point to a new uptrend once this expanded flat completes (if it's not already completed). The odds of the correction morphing into a complex combination remain low. I will therefore not commit strongly to either count yet. Instead, I’ll let price action unfold and refine the labeling as the market provides clearer signals.
![TraderJBx's tweet photo. $BTC 2022-2026 Wave Count Scenario
As I mentioned in a recent post, Bitcoin’s breach of $60k last week confirmed that we remain inside the expanded flat correction that started in late 2024. According to my current wave count for the advance from the 2022 low (quoted post), wave (4) has now retraced 53% over 18 months, compared to wave (2)’s 20% retracement in just 2 months. A 2.6x difference in retracement depth and a 9x difference in duration between two corrective waves within the same impulse does not follow the Elliott Wave guideline of equality (or proportionality). This reduces the probability of that count considerably.
Because of this, the wave count shown in the attached chart is now more probable. It better satisfies the equality guideline and displays cleaner Fibonacci relationships:
- Wave 4 retraced 33.27%, which is approximately 1.5x wave 2’s 22.18% retracement (close to the 1.618 relationship).
- Wave 4’s duration (182 days) is much closer to wave 2’s (154 days).
- The full impulse from late 2022 to late 2024 [wave (1), 742 days] and the current expanded flat [wave (2), 546 days] also show more balanced durations.
- From the all-time high, wave (2) has nearly reached the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement of the entire rally from the 2022 low—a common target for a wave of this magnitude.
I’m not particularly fond of this count for two reasons:
1. Unless the entire #Bitcoin Supercycle wave has already completed (low probability), we would still need at least three more major waves to finish the larger structure. This implies we may be in a very extended Cycle.
2. If we are indeed in an extension, my HTF wave count from the 2010 inception may require future refinements.
That said, trading and analysis aren’t about what we like or expect—they’re about what price actually does.
For now, I’m staying pragmatic: the exact labeling of the HTF structure doesn't matter right now because both viable counts point to a new uptrend once this expanded flat completes (if it's not already completed). The odds of the correction morphing into a complex combination remain low. I will therefore not commit strongly to either count yet. Instead, I’ll let price action unfold and refine the labeling as the market provides clearer signals.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKoBBkmXkAAhaeG.jpg)
Muchas gracias a todas las personas que asistieron a @lafuriadellibro en @EstacionMapocho, pasaron por el stand @stgoandereditor y fueron al lanzamiento de #breakingbad. Agradecer también a la organización y al centro cultural 🥳📚🚀🔥
#furia #libros #invierno #gracias #totales

#TOTALES diplerdeyiz

#TOTALES not much time left to for this re accumulation

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
BộĐội
Seen from Vietnam
anxiouspanda
Seen from Turkey
근육
Seen from United States
beurette #amateur #leak
Seen from France
LastFourWatched
Seen from United States
gaycest #brother
स्वच्छता_ही_सेवा
Seen from Korea
digitallogodesign
Seen from United States
minichat
Seen from United States
minichat()
Seen from Italy
Trends for you
Most Popular Users

Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers

Barack Obama 
@barackobama
118.9M followers

Cristiano Ronaldo 
@cristiano
114.6M followers

Donald J. Trump 
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers

Narendra Modi 
@narendramodi
107.1M followers

Rihanna 
@rihanna
98.7M followers

NASA 
@nasa
92.3M followers

Justin Bieber 
@justinbieber
91.8M followers

KATY PERRY 
@katyperry
90M followers

Taylor Swift 
@taylorswift13
84M followers

Lady Gaga 
@ladygaga
75.5M followers

Virat Kohli 
@imvkohli
73.5M followers

Kim Kardashian 
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers

YouTube 
@youtube
68.8M followers

Neymar Jr 
@neymarjr
66.5M followers

Bill Gates 
@billgates
65.2M followers

Selena Gomez 
@selenagomez
63.1M followers

The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers

CNN 
@cnn
61.8M followers

X 
@x
60.7M followers













