Top Tweets for #orera

Aragón Despierta @AragonDespierta

6 days ago

🙂🙂 Nuestro viaje por #Aragón nos lleva hoy a la localidad de #Orera, en la Comarca de la Comunidad de #Calatayud. ➡➡ Cuenta con 103 habitantes. Su perfil demográfico también responde al patrón del #AragónVaciado, pasando de 423 habitantes hace un siglo a los actuales 103.

AragonDespierta's tweet photo. 🙂🙂 Nuestro viaje por #Aragón nos lleva hoy a la localidad de #Orera, en la Comarca de la Comunidad de #Calatayud.

➡➡ Cuenta con 103 habitantes. Su perfil demográfico también responde al patrón del #AragónVaciado, pasando de 423 habitantes hace un siglo a los actuales 103. https://t.co/cKWyntpvVW

1

3

1

0

76

ねっむ/大阪個展9/12,13 @nempoint

about 2 months ago

166 no water #ORERA

nempoint's tweet photo. 166 no water
#ORERA https://t.co/LR5OPMUCYI

2

39

8

4

700

Trident United @TridentUnity

3 months ago

This is concerning @OdishaRera should be pro-homebuyers, not pro-brass name plate 👀#ORERA #Bhubaneswar

TridentUnity's tweet photo. This is concerning

@OdishaRera should be pro-homebuyers, not pro-brass name plate 👀#ORERA #Bhubaneswar https://t.co/hBi1zloCAz

Bimalendu Pradhan

@bpradhanodisha

3 months ago

To, Anu Garg, Chief Secretary, Odisha ✅An independent ORERA is welcome. ✅An ORERA built in defiance of the High Court is not. ✅💯Above all, an independent @OdishaRera must work for the interest of the home buyers than the Promoters. The MoHUA letter dated 07.05.2026 and ORERA's representation No. 3188 dated 18.05.2026 both seek what I have argued for years: a regulator with real financial and administrative autonomy under the RE(R&D) Act, 2016. I support that. But as the Chief Secretary's meeting on 24.06.2026 approaches, one caution must be placed on record. 1⃣ Autonomy is a statutory question, not an executive one. Section 75 of the Act constitutes a single Real Estate Regulatory Fund, administered and spent under Section 75(3) by a committee of the Authority's own Members. Section 77 governs budget and accounts. Whatever autonomy is granted must flow through these provisions, not around them. 2⃣ The High Court has already spoken on this very Fund. In Bimalendu Pradhan v. State of Odisha, W.P.(C) No. 8158/2019 (decided 01.07.2020), the Court directed the State to allocate funds from the Regulatory Fund through separate budgetary heads. That direction stands. Any new arrangement that re-routes or re-partitions the same Fund must reckon with it. 3⃣ Do not cure one deviation by creating another. The 2020 Odisha High Court's directions already sit in tension with Section 75(3), which the judgment did not consider. If the State now reshuffles the Fund again by executive order to "free" ORERA, without modifying the directions through the proper forum, it risks acting contrary to a subsisting order of the High Court. That is the borderline towards contempt. 4⃣ The lawful route is clear. If the existing directions obstruct the autonomy now sought, the State and ORERA should approach the High Court for clarification or modification, or seek the statutory amendment route. A regulator cannot be made independent by a method that places the Government in contempt of court. (NOTE: It has been 6 years since the said order in which I was the petitioner. My repeated requests to the previous ORERA Authority as well as the current one a year back to file review petition or challenge in the Apex court were not taken seriously till now.) 5⃣ A Home Buyer's position. Strengthen ORERA. Give it genuine control over its Fund, its staffing and its budget as Section 75 and the Act intend. But do it through the statute and through the Court, not in spite of either. 6⃣ A word of caution: Autonomy is not the same as accountability. The statute must be respected, but so must the record. Going by this Authority's own action and inaction, its extremely poor (or deliberately biased?) understanding of the RE(R&D) Act's provisions, it's delays in disposal, its failure to enforce its own recovery orders, its silence where homebuyers have looked for protection, there is genuine reason to ask whether it is ready to handle absolute power. If such independence is mis-used to (1)Appoint own acquittances in the office, (2)Spend half a lakh on a brass name plate, (3)The interior work or the choice of contractor takes precedence over "Home Buyers rights"......then ORERA should remain under the watchful eyes of the @HUDDeptOdisha Independence handed to an institution that has not shown the will to use its existing powers does not protect homebuyers. It only removes the few checks that still answer to them. So strengthen ORERA, but with autonomy and accountability in equal measure. Build in performance standards, public reporting, and answerability to the homebuyers it exists to serve. Autonomy earned lawfully and exercised responsibly will endure. Autonomy taken by shortcut, or used without restraint, will fail the very people it was meant to protect. The homebuyers of Odisha deserve a strong regulator, a Government that respects its own courts, and an Authority that earns the power it seeks. Let 24 June be the day we choose that path. @SecyChief @_anugarg @ushapadhee1996 Attached: 1. TOI reporting, 2. Letter from ORERA to CS, which led to the proposed meeting on 24th June, 3. The said Odisha High Court order, which must be considered and appropriate/correct steps should be taken.

bpradhanodisha's tweet photo. To,
Anu Garg,
Chief Secretary, Odisha

✅An independent ORERA is welcome.
✅An ORERA built in defiance of the High Court is not.
✅💯Above all, an independent @OdishaRera must work for the interest of the home buyers than the Promoters.

The MoHUA letter dated 07.05.2026 and ORERA's representation No. 3188 dated 18.05.2026 both seek what I have argued for years: a regulator with real financial and administrative autonomy under the RE(R&D) Act, 2016. I support that. But as the Chief Secretary's meeting on 24.06.2026 approaches, one caution must be placed on record.

1⃣ Autonomy is a statutory question, not an executive one.
Section 75 of the Act constitutes a single Real Estate Regulatory Fund, administered and spent under Section 75(3) by a committee of the Authority's own Members. Section 77 governs budget and accounts. Whatever autonomy is granted must flow through these provisions, not around them.

2⃣ The High Court has already spoken on this very Fund.
In Bimalendu Pradhan v. State of Odisha, W.P.(C) No. 8158/2019 (decided 01.07.2020), the Court directed the State to allocate funds from the Regulatory Fund through separate budgetary heads. That direction stands. Any new arrangement that re-routes or re-partitions the same Fund must reckon with it.

3⃣ Do not cure one deviation by creating another.
The 2020 Odisha High Court's directions already sit in tension with Section 75(3), which the judgment did not consider. If the State now reshuffles the Fund again by executive order to "free" ORERA, without modifying the directions through the proper forum, it risks acting contrary to a subsisting order of the High Court. That is the borderline towards contempt.

4⃣ The lawful route is clear.
If the existing directions obstruct the autonomy now sought, the State and ORERA should approach the High Court for clarification or modification, or seek the statutory amendment route. A regulator cannot be made independent by a method that places the Government in contempt of court.
(NOTE: It has been 6 years since the said order in which I was the petitioner. My repeated requests to the previous ORERA Authority as well as the current one a year back to file review petition or challenge in the Apex court were not taken seriously till now.)

5⃣ A Home Buyer's position.
Strengthen ORERA. Give it genuine control over its Fund, its staffing and its budget as Section 75 and the Act intend. But do it through the statute and through the Court, not in spite of either.

6⃣ A word of caution:
Autonomy is not the same as accountability. The statute must be respected, but so must the record. Going by this Authority's own action and inaction, its extremely poor (or deliberately biased?) understanding of the RE(R&D) Act's provisions, it's delays in disposal, its failure to enforce its own recovery orders, its silence where homebuyers have looked for protection, there is genuine reason to ask whether it is ready to handle absolute power.

If such independence is mis-used to (1)Appoint own acquittances in the office, (2)Spend half a lakh on a brass name plate, (3)The interior work or the choice of contractor takes precedence over "Home Buyers rights"......then ORERA should remain under the watchful eyes of the @HUDDeptOdisha

Independence handed to an institution that has not shown the will to use its existing powers does not protect homebuyers. It only removes the few checks that still answer to them.

So strengthen ORERA, but with autonomy and accountability in equal measure. Build in performance standards, public reporting, and answerability to the homebuyers it exists to serve. Autonomy earned lawfully and exercised responsibly will endure. Autonomy taken by shortcut, or used without restraint, will fail the very people it was meant to protect.

The homebuyers of Odisha deserve a strong regulator, a Government that respects its own courts, and an Authority that earns the power it seeks.

Let 24 June be the day we choose that path.

@SecyChief @_anugarg @ushapadhee1996

Attached:
1. TOI reporting,
2. Letter from ORERA to CS, which led to the proposed meeting on 24th June,
3. The said Odisha High Court order, which must be considered and appropriate/correct steps should be taken.

bpradhanodisha's tweet photo. To,
Anu Garg,
Chief Secretary, Odisha

✅An independent ORERA is welcome.
✅An ORERA built in defiance of the High Court is not.
✅💯Above all, an independent @OdishaRera must work for the interest of the home buyers than the Promoters.

The MoHUA letter dated 07.05.2026 and ORERA's representation No. 3188 dated 18.05.2026 both seek what I have argued for years: a regulator with real financial and administrative autonomy under the RE(R&D) Act, 2016. I support that. But as the Chief Secretary's meeting on 24.06.2026 approaches, one caution must be placed on record.

1⃣ Autonomy is a statutory question, not an executive one.
Section 75 of the Act constitutes a single Real Estate Regulatory Fund, administered and spent under Section 75(3) by a committee of the Authority's own Members. Section 77 governs budget and accounts. Whatever autonomy is granted must flow through these provisions, not around them.

2⃣ The High Court has already spoken on this very Fund.
In Bimalendu Pradhan v. State of Odisha, W.P.(C) No. 8158/2019 (decided 01.07.2020), the Court directed the State to allocate funds from the Regulatory Fund through separate budgetary heads. That direction stands. Any new arrangement that re-routes or re-partitions the same Fund must reckon with it.

3⃣ Do not cure one deviation by creating another.
The 2020 Odisha High Court's directions already sit in tension with Section 75(3), which the judgment did not consider. If the State now reshuffles the Fund again by executive order to "free" ORERA, without modifying the directions through the proper forum, it risks acting contrary to a subsisting order of the High Court. That is the borderline towards contempt.

4⃣ The lawful route is clear.
If the existing directions obstruct the autonomy now sought, the State and ORERA should approach the High Court for clarification or modification, or seek the statutory amendment route. A regulator cannot be made independent by a method that places the Government in contempt of court.
(NOTE: It has been 6 years since the said order in which I was the petitioner. My repeated requests to the previous ORERA Authority as well as the current one a year back to file review petition or challenge in the Apex court were not taken seriously till now.)

5⃣ A Home Buyer's position.
Strengthen ORERA. Give it genuine control over its Fund, its staffing and its budget as Section 75 and the Act intend. But do it through the statute and through the Court, not in spite of either.

6⃣ A word of caution:
Autonomy is not the same as accountability. The statute must be respected, but so must the record. Going by this Authority's own action and inaction, its extremely poor (or deliberately biased?) understanding of the RE(R&D) Act's provisions, it's delays in disposal, its failure to enforce its own recovery orders, its silence where homebuyers have looked for protection, there is genuine reason to ask whether it is ready to handle absolute power.

If such independence is mis-used to (1)Appoint own acquittances in the office, (2)Spend half a lakh on a brass name plate, (3)The interior work or the choice of contractor takes precedence over "Home Buyers rights"......then ORERA should remain under the watchful eyes of the @HUDDeptOdisha

Independence handed to an institution that has not shown the will to use its existing powers does not protect homebuyers. It only removes the few checks that still answer to them.

So strengthen ORERA, but with autonomy and accountability in equal measure. Build in performance standards, public reporting, and answerability to the homebuyers it exists to serve. Autonomy earned lawfully and exercised responsibly will endure. Autonomy taken by shortcut, or used without restraint, will fail the very people it was meant to protect.

The homebuyers of Odisha deserve a strong regulator, a Government that respects its own courts, and an Authority that earns the power it seeks.

Let 24 June be the day we choose that path.

@SecyChief @_anugarg @ushapadhee1996

Attached:
1. TOI reporting,
2. Letter from ORERA to CS, which led to the proposed meeting on 24th June,
3. The said Odisha High Court order, which must be considered and appropriate/correct steps should be taken.

bpradhanodisha's tweet photo. To,
Anu Garg,
Chief Secretary, Odisha

✅An independent ORERA is welcome.
✅An ORERA built in defiance of the High Court is not.
✅💯Above all, an independent @OdishaRera must work for the interest of the home buyers than the Promoters.

The MoHUA letter dated 07.05.2026 and ORERA's representation No. 3188 dated 18.05.2026 both seek what I have argued for years: a regulator with real financial and administrative autonomy under the RE(R&D) Act, 2016. I support that. But as the Chief Secretary's meeting on 24.06.2026 approaches, one caution must be placed on record.

1⃣ Autonomy is a statutory question, not an executive one.
Section 75 of the Act constitutes a single Real Estate Regulatory Fund, administered and spent under Section 75(3) by a committee of the Authority's own Members. Section 77 governs budget and accounts. Whatever autonomy is granted must flow through these provisions, not around them.

2⃣ The High Court has already spoken on this very Fund.
In Bimalendu Pradhan v. State of Odisha, W.P.(C) No. 8158/2019 (decided 01.07.2020), the Court directed the State to allocate funds from the Regulatory Fund through separate budgetary heads. That direction stands. Any new arrangement that re-routes or re-partitions the same Fund must reckon with it.

3⃣ Do not cure one deviation by creating another.
The 2020 Odisha High Court's directions already sit in tension with Section 75(3), which the judgment did not consider. If the State now reshuffles the Fund again by executive order to "free" ORERA, without modifying the directions through the proper forum, it risks acting contrary to a subsisting order of the High Court. That is the borderline towards contempt.

4⃣ The lawful route is clear.
If the existing directions obstruct the autonomy now sought, the State and ORERA should approach the High Court for clarification or modification, or seek the statutory amendment route. A regulator cannot be made independent by a method that places the Government in contempt of court.
(NOTE: It has been 6 years since the said order in which I was the petitioner. My repeated requests to the previous ORERA Authority as well as the current one a year back to file review petition or challenge in the Apex court were not taken seriously till now.)

5⃣ A Home Buyer's position.
Strengthen ORERA. Give it genuine control over its Fund, its staffing and its budget as Section 75 and the Act intend. But do it through the statute and through the Court, not in spite of either.

6⃣ A word of caution:
Autonomy is not the same as accountability. The statute must be respected, but so must the record. Going by this Authority's own action and inaction, its extremely poor (or deliberately biased?) understanding of the RE(R&D) Act's provisions, it's delays in disposal, its failure to enforce its own recovery orders, its silence where homebuyers have looked for protection, there is genuine reason to ask whether it is ready to handle absolute power.

If such independence is mis-used to (1)Appoint own acquittances in the office, (2)Spend half a lakh on a brass name plate, (3)The interior work or the choice of contractor takes precedence over "Home Buyers rights"......then ORERA should remain under the watchful eyes of the @HUDDeptOdisha

Independence handed to an institution that has not shown the will to use its existing powers does not protect homebuyers. It only removes the few checks that still answer to them.

So strengthen ORERA, but with autonomy and accountability in equal measure. Build in performance standards, public reporting, and answerability to the homebuyers it exists to serve. Autonomy earned lawfully and exercised responsibly will endure. Autonomy taken by shortcut, or used without restraint, will fail the very people it was meant to protect.

The homebuyers of Odisha deserve a strong regulator, a Government that respects its own courts, and an Authority that earns the power it seeks.

Let 24 June be the day we choose that path.

@SecyChief @_anugarg @ushapadhee1996

Attached:
1. TOI reporting,
2. Letter from ORERA to CS, which led to the proposed meeting on 24th June,
3. The said Odisha High Court order, which must be considered and appropriate/correct steps should be taken.

bpradhanodisha's tweet photo. To,
Anu Garg,
Chief Secretary, Odisha

✅An independent ORERA is welcome.
✅An ORERA built in defiance of the High Court is not.
✅💯Above all, an independent @OdishaRera must work for the interest of the home buyers than the Promoters.

The MoHUA letter dated 07.05.2026 and ORERA's representation No. 3188 dated 18.05.2026 both seek what I have argued for years: a regulator with real financial and administrative autonomy under the RE(R&D) Act, 2016. I support that. But as the Chief Secretary's meeting on 24.06.2026 approaches, one caution must be placed on record.

1⃣ Autonomy is a statutory question, not an executive one.
Section 75 of the Act constitutes a single Real Estate Regulatory Fund, administered and spent under Section 75(3) by a committee of the Authority's own Members. Section 77 governs budget and accounts. Whatever autonomy is granted must flow through these provisions, not around them.

2⃣ The High Court has already spoken on this very Fund.
In Bimalendu Pradhan v. State of Odisha, W.P.(C) No. 8158/2019 (decided 01.07.2020), the Court directed the State to allocate funds from the Regulatory Fund through separate budgetary heads. That direction stands. Any new arrangement that re-routes or re-partitions the same Fund must reckon with it.

3⃣ Do not cure one deviation by creating another.
The 2020 Odisha High Court's directions already sit in tension with Section 75(3), which the judgment did not consider. If the State now reshuffles the Fund again by executive order to "free" ORERA, without modifying the directions through the proper forum, it risks acting contrary to a subsisting order of the High Court. That is the borderline towards contempt.

4⃣ The lawful route is clear.
If the existing directions obstruct the autonomy now sought, the State and ORERA should approach the High Court for clarification or modification, or seek the statutory amendment route. A regulator cannot be made independent by a method that places the Government in contempt of court.
(NOTE: It has been 6 years since the said order in which I was the petitioner. My repeated requests to the previous ORERA Authority as well as the current one a year back to file review petition or challenge in the Apex court were not taken seriously till now.)

5⃣ A Home Buyer's position.
Strengthen ORERA. Give it genuine control over its Fund, its staffing and its budget as Section 75 and the Act intend. But do it through the statute and through the Court, not in spite of either.

6⃣ A word of caution:
Autonomy is not the same as accountability. The statute must be respected, but so must the record. Going by this Authority's own action and inaction, its extremely poor (or deliberately biased?) understanding of the RE(R&D) Act's provisions, it's delays in disposal, its failure to enforce its own recovery orders, its silence where homebuyers have looked for protection, there is genuine reason to ask whether it is ready to handle absolute power.

If such independence is mis-used to (1)Appoint own acquittances in the office, (2)Spend half a lakh on a brass name plate, (3)The interior work or the choice of contractor takes precedence over "Home Buyers rights"......then ORERA should remain under the watchful eyes of the @HUDDeptOdisha

Independence handed to an institution that has not shown the will to use its existing powers does not protect homebuyers. It only removes the few checks that still answer to them.

So strengthen ORERA, but with autonomy and accountability in equal measure. Build in performance standards, public reporting, and answerability to the homebuyers it exists to serve. Autonomy earned lawfully and exercised responsibly will endure. Autonomy taken by shortcut, or used without restraint, will fail the very people it was meant to protect.

The homebuyers of Odisha deserve a strong regulator, a Government that respects its own courts, and an Authority that earns the power it seeks.

Let 24 June be the day we choose that path.

@SecyChief @_anugarg @ushapadhee1996

Attached:
1. TOI reporting,
2. Letter from ORERA to CS, which led to the proposed meeting on 24th June,
3. The said Odisha High Court order, which must be considered and appropriate/correct steps should be taken.

0

23

11

3

5K

0

2

2

0

154

ଓଟିଭି

3 months ago

ORERA Tightens Rules For Builders: ରିଅଲ୍ ଇଷ୍ଟେଟ୍ କ୍ଷେତ୍ରରେ ସ୍ୱଚ୍ଛତା; ପ୍ରତି ତିନିମାସରେ ବିଲ୍ଡର ଦେବେ ତ୍ରୈମାସିକ ପ୍ରୋଗ୍ରେସ୍ ରିପୋର୍ଟ https://t.co/SZ3TIjqyrb #ORERA #RealEstate #FlatBuyers #BuilderRules #HousingProjects #OdishaNews #PropertyUpdate #HomeBuyers #RealEstateNews #ApartmentProjects

0

5

0

2

776

ଓଟିଭି

3 months ago

ଗ୍ରାହକଙ୍କୁ ଚୁନ ଲଗାଇପାରିବେନି ବିଲଡର୍...ପ୍ରତି ୩ ମାସରେଦେବେ ପ୍ରୋଗ୍ରେସ୍ ରିପୋର୍ଟ....ରିପୋର୍ଟ ଦାଖଲ ବାଧ୍ୟତାମୂଳକ କଲା ଓରେରା....ଖିଲାପ କଲେ ବ୍ୟାଙ୍କ ଆକାଉଣ୍ଟ ସିଜ୍... #ORERA #RealEstateRegulation #BuilderAccountability #HomebuyersRights #OdishaRealEstate #ProgressReportMandatory #OTV

0

16

2

2

1K

ଓଟିଭି

4 months ago

#୧୧୩_ପ୍ରମୋଟର୍ସଙ୍କୁ_ORERA_ନୋଟିସ୍ -ଆକ୍ସନ ମୋଡ୍‌ରେ ORERA; ୧୧୩ ଜଣଙ୍କୁ ଜାରି କଲା ନୋଟିସ୍ -ପଞ୍ଜିକୃତ ୧୧୩ ଜଣ ପ୍ରମୋଟର୍ସଙ୍କୁ କାରଣ ଦର୍ଶାଅ ନୋଟିସ୍‌ ଜାରି -ତ୍ରୟୋମାସିକ ପୋଗ୍ରେସିଭ୍‌ ରିପୋର୍ଟ ଦାଖଲ କରିନଥିବାରୁ ନୋଟିସ୍ -ରିଅଲ୍‌ ଇଷ୍ଟେଟ୍‌ କ୍ଷେତ୍ରରେ ସ୍ୱଚ୍ଛତା ଆଣିବା ପାଇଁ ORERAର ପଦକ୍ଷେପ #ORERA #RealEstate #OdishaRealEstate #Promoters #ShowCauseNotice #OTV

otvkhabar's tweet photo. #୧୧୩_ପ୍ରମୋଟର୍ସଙ୍କୁ_ORERA_ନୋଟିସ୍
-ଆକ୍ସନ ମୋଡ୍‌ରେ ORERA; ୧୧୩ ଜଣଙ୍କୁ ଜାରି କଲା ନୋଟିସ୍
-ପଞ୍ଜିକୃତ ୧୧୩ ଜଣ ପ୍ରମୋଟର୍ସଙ୍କୁ କାରଣ ଦର୍ଶାଅ ନୋଟିସ୍‌ ଜାରି
-ତ୍ରୟୋମାସିକ ପୋଗ୍ରେସିଭ୍‌ ରିପୋର୍ଟ ଦାଖଲ କରିନଥିବାରୁ ନୋଟିସ୍
-ରିଅଲ୍‌ ଇଷ୍ଟେଟ୍‌ କ୍ଷେତ୍ରରେ ସ୍ୱଚ୍ଛତା ଆଣିବା ପାଇଁ ORERAର ପଦକ୍ଷେପ
#ORERA #RealEstate #OdishaRealEstate #Promoters #ShowCauseNotice #OTV

0

18

1

2

2K

Industry Odisha

@industryodishaa

4 months ago

#Breaking | Big change for Odisha’s real estate sector 🏗️ Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority introduces revised QPR formats and permits offline submissions for non-digitally registered projects. #ORERA #Odisha

0

3

0

0

102

4 months ago

ORERA revises quarterly reporting norms, allows offline submissions for select projects #Odisha #ORERA https://t.co/gRJs3lzZ8V

0

5

1

0

700

5 months ago

ORERA order on office visit sparks outrage, activists term move ‘anti-consumer’ #Odisha #ORERA https://t.co/kOYTtGaRgq

0

0

0

0

800

ねっむ/大阪個展9/12,13 @nempoint

6 months ago

昨日の天気屋 #ORERA

nempoint's tweet photo. 昨日の天気屋
#ORERA https://t.co/sT6aJptI7r

nempoint's tweet photo. 昨日の天気屋
#ORERA https://t.co/sT6aJptI7r

nempoint's tweet photo. 昨日の天気屋
#ORERA https://t.co/sT6aJptI7r

0

11

2

0

1K

Trident Galaxy 3 Allottees Club @TridentGalaxy3

6 months ago

The builder wanted to get an extension @OdishaRera said “No way” Here’s why 👇 #Bhubaneswar #Odisha #Homebuyers #RealEstate #RERA #ORERA #BMC

TridentGalaxy3's tweet photo. The builder wanted to get an extension

@OdishaRera said “No way”

Here’s why 👇

#Bhubaneswar #Odisha #Homebuyers #RealEstate #RERA #ORERA #BMC https://t.co/ewWW2qs7vW

0

15

8

6

348

Trident United @TridentUnity

6 months ago

Janhit Mein Jaari #Bhubaneswar #Odisha #RERA #ORERA #Homebuyers #BMC

TridentUnity's tweet photo. Janhit Mein Jaari

#Bhubaneswar #Odisha #RERA #ORERA #Homebuyers #BMC https://t.co/UdtDG1Wq57

0

5

4

3

90

10 months ago

ORERA tightens quarterly disclosure rules for real estate agents from Dec 2025; penalties for lapses #Odisha #ORERA https://t.co/kkMKMZpNOf

0

7

0

0

1K

11 months ago

ORERA to appoint land expert to resolve complex property disputes #Odisha #ORERA https://t.co/mj1h41iJmv

0

5

1

0

1K

ଓଟିଭି

12 months ago

ଆଉ ବର୍ଷ ବର୍ଷ ଧରି ପଡ଼ିରହିବନି ରିୟଲ ଇଷ୍ଟେଟ୍ ମାମଲା, କ୍ରେତା ବିକ୍ରେତାଙ୍କ ମଧ୍ୟରେ ହେବ ଆପୋଷ ବୁଝାମଣା #orera #resolve #realestate #cdrcell #OTV https://t.co/yHNDMvAZ2U

0

2

0

1

545

12 months ago

Odisha RERA launches CDR Cell to expedite home-buying dispute resolution #Odisha #ORERA https://t.co/mR7QZWvg55

13

8

1

0

1K

ForCollecting @ForCollecting

about 1 year ago

Check out #Vinyl #Records #Melodiya #33rpm #LP #Vocal #instrumental #ensemble #ORERA #Songs of World https://t.co/ydRIa7sx54 #eBay via @eBay

0

5

6

0

67

about 1 year ago

ORERA: Odisha government seeks ‘Action Taken Reports’ to accelerate RERA implementation #Odisha #ORERA https://t.co/0BSbnlYlMg

0

5

2

0

1K

about 1 year ago

Odisha tightens real estate regulations: ORERA to get more teeth, monthly enforcement calendar soon #Odisha #ORERA https://t.co/Tlr0sB4Vpw

0

16

1

0

3K

Aragón Digital

about 1 year ago

🤨#Orera, el pueblo con cartel de entrada… pero sin salida. https://t.co/v3sOzcdCog

0

2

0

0

262

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users