The family of a 19-year-old is suing OpenAI over claims that his conversations with ChatGPT led him to overdose, and die.
Sam Nelson’s parents allege ChatGPT “encouraged” him to “consume a combination of substances that any licensed medical professional would have recognized as deadly,” leading up to his death.
According to The Verge, Nelson’s parents claim ChatGPT gave their son advice about how to “safely combine” different substances in the months leading up to his death, including prescription pills, alcohol, over-the-counter medication, and other drugs.
On May 31st, 2025, the day of Nelson’s death, his parents claim ChatGPT “actively coached” their son to mix Kratom with Xanax.
Nelson died after consuming a combination of alcohol, Xanax, and Kratom.
Full story: https://t.co/39sOji8pZH.
I cannot unsee this.
I've been watching Trump answer questions for years. The confidence. The certainty. The way he shuts down a room. I genuinely thought he was one of the sharpest communicators alive.
Then one day I caught myself finishing his sentence before he said it.
Not guessing. Knowing. Word for word. Before he said it.
So I pulled the transcripts.
Press conferences. Interviews. Sprays. Egg prices. Greenland. January 6th. Military strikes. Different years. Different reporters. Completely different topics.
Same thing every time.
Every single time Trump is asked a question — any question — he runs the exact same 7 steps. In the exact same order. Without exception.
This is not personality.
This is not confidence.
This is not charisma.
This is a deliberate repeatable formula. And I can prove it.
His actual words. Public record. Verify every single one yourself.
📷 STEP 1 — KILL THE QUESTION
(First thing every time — make the question itself the problem.)
📷 "That's a stupid question." / "Fake news."
📷 STEP 2 — KILL WHO ASKED IT
(Destroy the source so the question has nowhere to stand.)
📷 "Your ratings are terrible. Nobody watches your network."
📷 STEP 3 — INSERT HIMSELF
(Every topic. Every time. Without fail. It always lands here.)
📷 "Nobody has ever done what I've done."
📷 STEP 4 — SCALE IT TO THE BIGGEST CLAIM POSSIBLE
(Not good. Not great. The greatest. Ever. In history. Every single time.)
📷 "More than any administration — by far." / "Nobody has ever had crowds like I've had — in history, for any country."
📷 STEP 5 — UNNAMED PEOPLE AGREE
(Faceless. Countless. Unverifiable. Always there.)
📷 "Smart people are saying it. Great people. A lot of people."
📷 STEP 6 — VAGUE THREAT
(Something bad will happen. Never specified. Always implied.)
📷 "All hell will break out." / "They know it. Believe me."
📷 STEP 7 — LOOP BACK TO HIMSELF
(Different words. Same destination. Formula complete.)
📷 "It's been an amazing period of time. Page after page of accomplishments."
The question was never answered.
The formula just ran.
Go back and watch any clip.
Any year. Any topic. Any reporter.
Count the steps.
I'll wait.
This is the part nobody wants to sit with:
Real conviction engages with the actual question. It sometimes stumbles. Sometimes says I don't know. It changes shape based on what's in front of it.
A formula runs the same 7 steps whether the topic is war or egg prices.
Which means the response was never built for the question.
It was built for you.
To feel powerful. To feel certain. To stop you from noticing that nothing was actually answered.
And it worked.
For years it worked.
Pull any transcript. Public record. Count the steps yourself.
This isn't about politics.
This is about what you were never supposed to notice.
I've found the same deliberate pattern running in another major figure in this administration. Different slots. Same principle. Same effect.
Next post I break it down.
Follow or miss it. VIA~~ Jamie Hoo
Scott Ritter: After US strike on Iranian girl’s school, DoD identified a large accumulation of people — children and teachers who survived, and parents coming to check on them.
The US dropped another tomahawk on them, which was modified to create a massive thermobaric explosion.
“We put the 4th cruise missile in there, turned it into a thermobaric bomb, and burned these children alive.”
“That’s this war in a nutshell. We don’t know what we’re doing, we don’t know what we’re targeting, and all we’re doing is murdering people.”
to be fair, analysis from an ex-manager who once substituted a goalkeeper after 21 minutes and then called him "the worst professional I've ever seen" is actually quite useful
https://t.co/8d5SAeolnL
I love these kinds of things. Gives the noble yet fragile British pundit a great chance to explain why once again, they were all entirely wrong. Laundering their reputation as politics understanders ready for the next round of learning nothing and being wrong.
With 118 elementary school aged girls slaughtered by the United States and Israel today in Iran, it’s the single deadliest attack against young girls in the MODERN HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
If these girls were white Christians or Jews it would be the biggest story for months.
George Wallace in 1962: "You know, I tried to talk about good roads and good schools and all these things that have been part of my career, and nobody listened. And then I began talking about n------s, and they stomped the floor."
This is one of the most amazing things I had seen at the Winter Olympics. How @AmberGlenn_ has trained her body to do this is beyond my mind.
It is physically incredible 🙌🙌🙌
“I search for those moments when movement takes meaning. When I can surrender and my body explodes into motion.
I dance for the pure joy of it… for the laugh that escapes mid-spin and when time forgets to count.
I didn’t choose it, it chose me and when it all comes together in perfection…
It is freedom.
It is home”.
9/11 first responders went to Cuba to get healthcare.
Cuba took care of them when America discarded them and left them for dead.
Cuba was repaid with crippling sanctions and now threats of war.
🚨 If you’re confused why the Trump administration is suddenly claiming there’s “massive fraud” in daycares… without evidence… here’s the reality:
It’s not about fraud.
It’s about defunding childcare.
And it’s laid out plainly in Project 2025.
Project 2025 argues that the federal government should stop supporting large-scale childcare systems and instead “support parents directly” so one parent can stay home.
Sounds benign… until you look closer.
👉 There is no plan to replace a real income.
👉 No wage replacement.
👉 No guarantee families can survive on one paycheck.
“Paying parents to stay home” in Project 2025 does not come anywhere close to replacing what a parent earns in the workforce. It’s not a living wage. It’s not sustainable. It doesn’t cover rent, healthcare, groceries, student loans, or childcare for other kids.
So what’s actually happening?
👉 They want to defund daycare
👉 While not offering a real financial alternative
👉 While cutting programs like Head Start
👉 While rolling back access to birth control and abortion
That’s not support. That’s coercion.
When childcare disappears and reproductive autonomy disappears, women don’t “choose” to leave the workforce… they’re forced out.
This is the pipeline:
• Undermine abortion access
• Restrict contraception
• Defund childcare
• Offer symbolic “parent support” that doesn’t cover lost income
• Push women back into financial dependence
Project 2025 isn’t subtle about its worldview. It prioritizes a single-income, male-breadwinner household… without building an economy where that’s actually possible.
So when you hear panic about “daycare fraud,” understand what’s really being set up:
No childcare.
No reproductive choice.
No real economic alternative.
That’s not family values.
That’s economic and government control.
The more financial desperate families get, the more the rich can exploit the working class.