I currently research Christian origins within the political and social context of the Roman world, with a focus on power, elite family networks, and historical method.
My work and writing can be found here:
https://t.co/5NZfwwNubW
@whencyclopedia "Lost much of his popularity” needs qualifying. The article itself shows Nero’s fall was driven by the Senate, generals, army, and Praetorian Guard. That is not quite the same as saying ordinary Romans simply turned against him.
@wmarybeard This is exactly why Rome still matters. Not because it sits safely in the past, but because it keeps pressing on how we think about politics, power, society, and ourselves
Nero died #OnThisDay in AD 68.
Was he the Antichrist? The bestial image of the Roman emperor as the enemy of Christians persists, but the truth is more complex.
🔓 This archive article is free for 7 days
https://t.co/2gNnF1rAHC
@HistoryToday Malik makes a very good point here. Nero as “the Antichrist” is much clearer in later Christian tradition than it is in the actual first-century evidence.
Mary Beard has made this point in her own way - classics is not boring.
Power, sex, war, religion, corruption, murder, money, family feuds, and propaganda are not boring.
If there is a connection and relevance problem, perhaps the root problem is how it is being presented.
"Somewhere along the line, academia parted company with readers. Academics sniff at history books that the public enjoys."
— Catherine Nixey, Culture correspondent, @TheEconomist.
How did we get to this point in writing history?
A good reminder: This is how cumulative evidence works in scholarship. No single item proves the case, but the pattern is treated as meaningful.
That standard has to be applied consistently, especially when the conclusion is uncomfortable.
https://t.co/0SznzLPy5a
This is too sweeping. Plenty of learned and interesting people are on here. The problem isn’t that they’re absent, but that the platform often rewards the loudest and least reflective voices.
@AntigoneJournal@theo_nash I agree that the whole thing is tedious, but the basic point matters. If a translation is not trying to represent the original accurately for readers who cannot read it, then what is it supposed to be?
Style, tone, and idiom involve choices. Accuracy still has to be the aim.
@BretDevereaux Exactly. Treating ancient texts seriously means asking who wrote them, who had the ability and resources to write them, what they could know, and what pressures they were writing under. That isn’t hating the classics. It’s refusing to treat them as sacred texts.
This cuts through the lazy “great man” version of Alexander.
He was great at conquest. That doesn’t make him wise, humane, or good at ruling. It just shows how easily military success gets mistaken for greatness.
A number of responses here are shocked, shocked! that I could say that Alexander was only great at killing, but if you challenge them to say what else he was great at...they mostly sputter.
So was Alexander great at things other than warfare and killing? 1/
Mary Beard is right. Universities matter because they defend complexity and difficulty in a world drawn to simplification. The challenge is making sure that ideal applies beyond established academic boundaries, to difficult arguments and uncomfortable questions from outside them.
A useful discussion. But historians need to answer the public’s question in simple terms:
Why should we care?
That means explaining why ancient history matters to people outside universities, not just why it matters inside them.
Is ancient history essential...or becoming obsolete?
New #podcast on the challenges facing the study of the ancient world w/ leading scholars who don’t all agree... but all believe the stakes are high @barrystrauss@drangiehobbs@WalterScheidel :
https://t.co/NfM4ktCTiL
Morally? Whoever had the lowest score for killing and corruption, so probably no one.
Politically? Augustus. Turning one-man rule into “restored republic” was quite the trick.
Latin is still alive, and not just for scholars and enthusiasts; in some places, it's still used as imperial propaganda, just as it was in Ancient Rome. Today, Michael Fontaine of @Cornell investigates the strange case of Vladimir Putin's Latin orations... https://t.co/BLhANF5NfP