@Cryptified_Soul AMFI data says small cap mcap has shrinked from 1889cr to 1806cr
when the small cap average mcap contracts, it tells u something fundamental: the companies in this universe are getting smaller, not bigger. it's a data signal about where value is compressing vs where it's building
@ValueWithPrem This is misleading, There is Min order value on every food delivery app ,
And Platform fee is anyways added to your Cart , does’t matter if your order is worth 10₹ or 1000₹ . Same platform fee.And with your 1-₹40 order surge deliveryfee, gst , small cart fee will be added.
@satishkumar85@mshahi0024 There are full fledged series on CIA ops a, Mossad Ops Why you don’t have problem there,
And if there’s a movie covering about RAW ops you’ve a big problem .
Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while.
For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt.
The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale.
Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general.
This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less.
We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal.
Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”).
And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility.
Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income.
And then what happens?
The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated.
The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door.
Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.
Now this isis sympathiser Dhruv rathee wants his Illiterate awaam to spam and pressurize indian govt to show /list or accept their spies😍😍😍what a Guy👌🏻👌🏻
Good belt treatment done by people in his video comment section
#Dhurandhar@dhruv_rathee
@volklub Sunderdeep sir u forgot to mention the biggest upgrade that new seltos will be on K3 platform.
Great Engineering stable and reliable .
I thought you were a kind of person who appreciates engineering > looks but your last few tweets showed you are disappointed
@dashman207 It is not hyped it is loved and in My city i can see houseful everywhere. If you didn’t like something doesn’t mean it is propaganda right? Or if you are drama lover and expected a spy to dance on beach on “jhoome jo pathaan” then it’s your problem.
Akshat’s desi hedge fund will be the first in the world to blow up in record time.
Rememeber,this guy was bullish on Gensol.
If basic finance and elementary forensic analysis are the entry-level requirements, he’s still waiting outside the gate. So much for “financial acumen.”
He is a financial clown nothing else.🤡
@dhruv_rathee@aifiesta Chat gpt pro , gemini pro and perplexity pro are free in their latest version .
For what are u charging ?
For clubbing the ai model ?
Scammer
@mohitlaws dhruv is nothing without YouTube,
Gaurav is IITian and pilot , also Co founder of 2 fmcg brands .
While dhruv career only relies on anti India payroll and YouTube.