@jduck@Apple@LowLevelTweets Thanks! I'm aware of secure/confidential computing technologies, but it's not the same. I'm looking for official @Apple's docs to verify their claims.
if there's none publicly available yet, I think @Apple must release detailed technical documentation describing Private Cloud Compute's security architecture ASAP. They keep claiming it is 'private' and 'secure' w/o enough verifiable info. (again, the June 10 post is not enough)
@Apple your updates regularly reset settings to their default values, or completely delete changes in files like /etc/pf.conf. had to automate checking for issues like this in an entire lab. Is there a better way? ... ... ...
'Corporate World', please stop sending customer surveys emails and the like with links to domains other than your own! Your customers must not be trained to click links in unknown domains! You're wasting your anti-phishing training budget...
GPRS (2G & 3G data) encryption schemes GEA-1 and GEA-2 have a security of 2^40 (due to a backdoor) and 2^45 (apparently unintentional) instead of the expected 2^64, which translates to practical, real-time attacks.
Nice Chromium 1-Day. Apparently 32-bit only memory corruption bugs like this integer overflow => heap overflow are not considered to be a big deal any more. Fixed 13 days ago and still not merged in the stable channel. π
@singe@_wald0@uspto@CptJesus@harmj0y Even if not. How does such a patent help others (vendors or other open source developers)?
Imagine if Hernan Ochoa, who wrote WCE had applied for a patent on accessing the LSASS memory to dump user creds. Would Benjamin Delphy now have to pay license fees for his Mimikatz?
Not a single south-american country is eligible for Apple's Security Research Device program, could start with Argentina (in alphabetical order..) @AppleSupport@apple@dlitchfield