Mav

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@EnjoyingBitcoin @FiscalDominanc @axexang I don’t think I like that strategy. I agree core has been shitting the bed but it’s dangerous to go forward without an idea of what that looks like

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@axexang @EnjoyingBitcoin Okay, but who is behind knots, who will maintain knots?

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@Infonchain @MajorianBTC Sorry, but I do not understand. Can you elaborate on what you mean?

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@Infonchain @MajorianBTC What’s makes you say ineffective?

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@DadGuy1986 @ToneVays @LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin It’s so clearly and obviously not “nothing”

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@CaminaDrummer4 @hodlonaut Who is maintaining the code base?

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@Anton__BTC No worries. I’m slow and I still don’t get it :). Hopefully one day we’ll figure it out.

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@joseph_welbourn Okay you got me. The point I’m trying to sort out is, what does the development environment look like under knots, seems a bit uncertain, no?

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@Pledditor A big problem I see is that these people think they know better and are trying to be leaders. This situation though seems way more complex than the big blocker debate - that one was obvious.

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@SuperhwySurfer @ToneVays @DadGuy1986 Okay so it’s not just spam control. There’s that too. Why is tone saying technically there is nothing it does? Sounds like technically there is a couple of things.

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@GhostofMapl @TronMonGone @hodlonaut How does it fuck with the utxo set? What does that mean. I’m genuinely curious what you mean by it being reckless.

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

You can’t stuff arbitrary or fancy logic into outputs anymore.

Standard payments (P2PKH, P2WPKH, Taproot key-path spends) already fit.

Weird constructions and “data-as-script” tricks get blocked.

2/4

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@GrassFedBitcoin Thanks Mechanic. Now i'll try to get that translated :). Appreciate the reply.

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@GrassFedBitcoin neither you or tone ever explained at Lugano why bip-110 is or does. Is the point that it limits opreturn data? What else?

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@ToneVays @DadGuy1986 It caps opreturn data to 83 bytes?

[Mav @heyitsthemav]

@ToneVays @DadGuy1986 No that’s inaccurate. I absolutely don’t want the world to lose confidence in bitcoin’s decentralization. 🤷‍♂️