@PapasWapas1234@Whiticius@S0_n_a@x_MoonlitShade@Wambulogy I'm not making a point, I'm asking you a different question
yes blue is the obvious answer in the original question
what do you as a blue voter in the original answer in this question which is imo a more interesting question anyways as there's no cop out answer of 'but kids'
@Brumcum@PapasWapas1234@Whiticius@S0_n_a@x_MoonlitShade@Wambulogy What was the point in this comment
I'm responding to someone saying blue is moral because people who can't understand the question will pick it
Fine, is blue still the correct choice then if that's not there. I think that's a more interesting question anyways.
@EnderSword@Oreofirelight@meaning_enjoyer this makes the whole question reductive and blue the obvious moral choice. the actual question should be assuming everyone can fully understand the question what would you pick
@FLMito@LastLegCrushed@SirKickass I don't think this has ever been said
I see a lot of blue voters calling red voters subhuman, as you are effectively doing in this post
@DynamicDodrio@clockworksDream what?
people pick blue to save other people picking blue. if you pick blue you are also one of those people that needs to be saved. blue deaths are on blue hands too
@BishopBoye@FickWillem@RodgersKipembe how many employees did NASA have during the Apollo missions, compare it to how many they have now. Additionally compare the budget. You have your answer.
@jon_garfield2@_ontologic so then you would never accept that it can be intelligent. so you were arguing in bad faith from the start given you won't even define what you want from it.