@Zedzies@CatfishFishy @TheCryptoLark That’s fine, we can all hold our own opinions. Either way, what both Chainlink and Layer One X are bringing to the blockchain world are great advancements for the space!
@CatfishFishy @TheCryptoLark This is a little bit nasty! Why would you make a post on this when in fact you are incorrect? 🤔 You’re going to look a little silly once this launches and its the real deal. Real and legitimate project launching in August ‘23. Happens to be in public sale at the moment.
@CatfishFishy @TheCryptoLark CCIP also isn’t running their own VM. Layer One X is a new Layer 1 who’s built its own VM from the ground up. It really is game changing!
@CatfishFishy @TheCryptoLark No CCIP isn’t a bridge. I said it uses a bridge. Chainlink using the term “Programmable Token Bridge” Layer One X, performs all CCIP can do and more without the use of any bridge. That’s all I was trying to get across
@CatfishFishy @TheCryptoLark Yes, this is one of the examples of cross chain swaps involving logic transfer from one chain to another, but obviously you haven’t looked into Layer One X to see how limited CCIP is in comparison RE logic transfer. It’s ok though, enough space for many blockchains to co-exist
@CatfishFishy @TheCryptoLark Also, layer One X will do all this without any bridges whatsoever. As safe as Chainlink claims CCIP bridge to be, Layer One X will eliminate bridges altogether! Making it faster for finality as well. Layer One X is setting the standard 👀