Chainlink has literally 1000X the users of Quant, both in DeFi and TradFi.
For example, the DTCC, which clears and settles over $4 quadrillion per year for US capital markets, embedded Chainlink CRE + CCIP into its own chain to build 24/7 collateral management.
https://t.co/mZVU8MhMW4
"Chainlink will be integrated into DTCC’s Collateral AppChain to enable the seamless pairing of asset prices, valuations and movement with the aim of overhauling how market risk is managed globally. CRE is built to operate at institutional scale and provides access to a resilient data and orchestration layer, unlocking automated workflows for the Collateral AppChain’s advanced eligibility, valuation, margining, collateral optimization, settlement, and related post-trade processes."
This single integration is worth more than Quant will ever achieve in 100 years.
Now, let's reverse the question back to you:
Why doesn't Quant carry a marketcap of $0 given that it has produced zero evidence of even a single QNT token ever being acquired for their "enterprise licenses?"
@uptownsaul@swiftcommunity Yes, it's purely coincidental that the best place to have discussions on the XRPL is underneath Swift's tweets about their own upcoming, highly anticipated blockchain.
The deception is in trying portray as what Swift is doing as being similar enough to XRPL that the drooling mob of XRP holders can convince themselves that Swift will be announcing something pertaining to XRP.
You, of course, morally absolve yourself of this as all fair-game "speculation", which is what you think crypto is all about.
The utility of XRP is to stop free spam on the XRP spreadsheet, but the price is defined by the amount of misinformation slop you can peddle about the centralized company.
$XRP
The utility of XRP is to stop free spam on the XRP spreadsheet, but the price is defined by the amount of misinformation slop you can peddle about the centralized company.
$XRP
@uptownsaul@swiftcommunity You obviously know that not a single word of what Swift writes has anything to do with XRP, but creating misinformative speculation is what crypto is all about for you, right?
But, you're not a liar, of course.
@sjdedic@avichal The biggest bull case is ETH not capturing enough value to support its valuation and now needing to nag, plead, and peddle Mother Goose story hour slop to get a bid?
The world needs precisely zero more SOV assets.
Very excited to have spoken at the Aladdin Client Forum. I am very impressed by both Aladdin and the BlackRock team overall, they are some of the smartest people in global finance that I have ever met and I can clearly see why they have the market share that they do.
It is clear that BlackRock has a huge roll to play in on-chain asset management, fund tokenization and the overall growth of on-chain finance as the new preferred way that assets are managed by the top institutions. AI is clearly a tool that will interact in many useful ways with BlackRock systems and multiple chains, adding a new layer of complexity that needs orchestration for agents to efficiently and safely use various chains; the Chainlink ecosystem has built CRE to solve exactly these multifaceted orchestration problems. I am excited about what Chainlink can offer both the BlackRock tokenized fund management side and the Aladdin software side of BlackRock, I can see both of them massively benefiting from the Chainlink Standard.
@xrpbreezy@xrpmickle 1. Satire? The XRP was obtained for free; everything else wasn't.
2. The founder of the protocol isn't even bullish on it when it's at $1, and you have a community of millions who think it is going to $10-$1000.
>“What blockchains are doing is the connective tissue between all those different exchanges, banks, and databases around the world.”
1000% False. Chainlink is the connective tissue between all of those different exchanges, banks, databases, *and* blockchains.
Blockchains are just another isolated silo that need connecting. @LoganJastremski is still stuck in 2017 where he thinks a blockchain is the "internet of finance/value/whatever"
>But what does that have to do with your investment in Link or any other asset?
Are you literally braindead? Because XRP is taking credit for the things that Chainlink is actually doing like Swift and DTCC.
Because XRP social media slop merchants are pushing narratives like "Chainlink just does price feeds; XRP is value/liquidity", which isn't true.
>We all know that your objective isn’t to disprove social media claims. You’re pushing an anti-XRP narrative
Disproving social media claims is synonymous with being "anti-xrp" because XRP literally has zero fundamentals.
There is literally zero reasons to be bullish on it. It is all misinformation and hoaxes.
Stolen valor has nothing to do with how many low information rubes they got to bid it.
Stolen valor is about XRP social media slop merchants pushing misinformation to convice those rubes that XRP is being used in tons of projects/places it isn't ever going to be used.
Examples: Swift, DTCC, the infinite fake bank partnerships, 1700 NDAs+, etc.
Because XRP is such irrelevant vaporware, yet XRP social media slop merchants are so desperate to engagement farm off it, it has forced them to create lies about *OTHER projects* and engage in "stolen valor" in order to create relevance for XRP.
If the XRPL was discussed as much other chains that have similar usage to it (like Ethereum Classic or something), I wouldn't talk about it at all.