I don't care what color, race, ethnicity, religion you are if you:
1) Immigrate legally
2) Because you want to BE American & live an honest, upstanding life grateful for the blessings of being American, loving & supporting the best of Western and American ideals
I want to make something clear to Republican House & Senate members:
The American people don’t want to hear that you WON’T introduce legislation b/c you think it won’t pass.
We EXPECT you to vote on bills, so we can find out who’s with us & against us.
@MSkalenius So Trump's inspiring *some* patriotism and gumption to protect Denmark's/Europe's interests in you? Good. That's what he's trying to do. Now turn it against mass immigration and save yourselves and your continent.
It is only because we did pathetic shit like this that Trump even dares to threaten us.
(Yes this is from our armies official accounts)
We Europeans deserve everything we're getting. And in many ways I am grateful to Trump for calling us out on our insanity. May things change.
If people come to live in Britain, they should accept they will live under English or Scottish law
They must not be allowed to import their own legal systems
If they want Sharia law there are over 60 countries which can provide it for them
@DangeRuss0456@Eternal_Saints_ Looks like they're just marking where those family's grave plots are. The grave itself faces east to west and may have an E-W facing stone placed on it once the earth settles.
@george__mack I’ve written a detailed prompt for Grok that scans the X handles I’ve provided. It then generates a daily summary of what these individuals have said in memo format, so essentially, you’ll read this one page.
If ICE and Border Patrol was murderous youd see dead Mexicans all over the border.
Do people even realize how many foreigners they save in that desert a month.
Absurd the crap these fools come up with now.
This is how to avoid ICE raids. Sanctuary cities don’t want to avoid ICE raids because they need the optics of them to push destabilization of the US for their bosses.
Just a reminder of what I said in the first few hours after this event: there is really very little practical value to this kind of in-depth video analysis. In fact, ironically, the further we get from the event and the more in-depth the analysis, the less value it actually has.
This is because the officer must make a decision about how to act in real time, in the midst of a high-stress, life-or-death situation. So we can only judge his actions in real time.
That doesn’t mean that this kind of thing has no possible value. It could be valuable in future training efforts, for example. But it’s not very useful for judging the particulars of this case.
In fact, the existence of enough ambiguity to justify such an in-depth analysis is itself exonerating. It demonstrates that if the case is this hard to figure out with all the time in the world, then the officer acted reasonably in the moment.
The best possible way to evaluate a case like this would be to see it in real time, exactly once. That would give you the most accurate sense of the tension, of the states, of the officer’s likely frame of mind, and of the speed of the situation.